222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26702760)
1. Foundations of MRI phase imaging and processing for Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping (QSM).
Schweser F; Deistung A; Reichenbach JR
Z Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 26(1):6-34. PubMed ID: 26702760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Joint 2D and 3D phase processing for quantitative susceptibility mapping: application to 2D echo-planar imaging.
Wei H; Zhang Y; Gibbs E; Chen NK; Wang N; Liu C
NMR Biomed; 2017 Apr; 30(4):. PubMed ID: 26887812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping: Concepts and Applications.
Reichenbach JR; Schweser F; Serres B; Deistung A
Clin Neuroradiol; 2015 Oct; 25 Suppl 2():225-30. PubMed ID: 26198880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An illustrated comparison of processing methods for phase MRI and QSM: removal of background field contributions from sources outside the region of interest.
Schweser F; Robinson SD; de Rochefort L; Li W; Bredies K
NMR Biomed; 2017 Apr; 30(4):. PubMed ID: 27717080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Nonlinear formulation of the magnetic field to source relationship for robust quantitative susceptibility mapping.
Liu T; Wisnieff C; Lou M; Chen W; Spincemaille P; Wang Y
Magn Reson Med; 2013 Feb; 69(2):467-76. PubMed ID: 22488774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accelerated mapping of magnetic susceptibility using 3D planes-on-a-paddlewheel (POP) EPI at ultra-high field strength.
Stäb D; Bollmann S; Langkammer C; Bredies K; Barth M
NMR Biomed; 2017 Apr; 30(4):. PubMed ID: 27763692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Overview of quantitative susceptibility mapping.
Deistung A; Schweser F; Reichenbach JR
NMR Biomed; 2017 Apr; 30(4):. PubMed ID: 27434134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Toward online reconstruction of quantitative susceptibility maps: superfast dipole inversion.
Schweser F; Deistung A; Sommer K; Reichenbach JR
Magn Reson Med; 2013 Jun; 69(6):1582-94. PubMed ID: 22791625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Preconditioned total field inversion (TFI) method for quantitative susceptibility mapping.
Liu Z; Kee Y; Zhou D; Wang Y; Spincemaille P
Magn Reson Med; 2017 Jul; 78(1):303-315. PubMed ID: 27464893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM): Decoding MRI data for a tissue magnetic biomarker.
Wang Y; Liu T
Magn Reson Med; 2015 Jan; 73(1):82-101. PubMed ID: 25044035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correction of magnetic field inhomogeneity effects for fast quantitative susceptibility mapping.
Ngo GC; Bilgic B; Gagoski BA; Sutton BP
Magn Reson Med; 2019 Mar; 81(3):1645-1658. PubMed ID: 30387905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. High-resolution characterisation of the aging brain using simultaneous quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) and R2* measurements at 7T.
Betts MJ; Acosta-Cabronero J; Cardenas-Blanco A; Nestor PJ; Düzel E
Neuroimage; 2016 Sep; 138():43-63. PubMed ID: 27181761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Single-step quantitative susceptibility mapping with variational penalties.
Chatnuntawech I; McDaniel P; Cauley SF; Gagoski BA; Langkammer C; Martin A; Grant PE; Wald LL; Setsompop K; Adalsteinsson E; Bilgic B
NMR Biomed; 2017 Apr; 30(4):. PubMed ID: 27332141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Structural and functional quantitative susceptibility mapping from standard fMRI studies.
Sun H; Seres P; Wilman AH
NMR Biomed; 2017 Apr; 30(4):. PubMed ID: 27687150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comprehensive numerical analysis of background phase correction with V-SHARP.
Özbay PS; Deistung A; Feng X; Nanz D; Reichenbach JR; Schweser F
NMR Biomed; 2017 Apr; 30(4):. PubMed ID: 27259117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Investigating hyperoxic effects in the rat brain using quantitative susceptibility mapping based on MRI phase.
Hsieh MC; Kuo LW; Huang YA; Chen JH
Magn Reson Med; 2017 Feb; 77(2):592-602. PubMed ID: 26834053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Background field removal technique based on non-regularized variable kernels sophisticated harmonic artifact reduction for phase data for quantitative susceptibility mapping.
Kan H; Arai N; Takizawa M; Omori K; Kasai H; Kunitomo H; Hirose Y; Shibamoto Y
Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Oct; 52():94-101. PubMed ID: 29902566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Single-shot imaging with higher-dimensional encoding using magnetic field monitoring and concomitant field correction.
Testud F; Gallichan D; Layton KJ; Barmet C; Welz AM; Dewdney A; Cocosco CA; Pruessmann KP; Hennig J; Zaitsev M
Magn Reson Med; 2015 Mar; 73(3):1340-57. PubMed ID: 24687529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MRI-based quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) and R2* mapping of liver iron overload: Comparison with SQUID-based biomagnetic liver susceptometry.
Sharma SD; Fischer R; Schoennagel BP; Nielsen P; Kooijman H; Yamamura J; Adam G; Bannas P; Hernando D; Reeder SB
Magn Reson Med; 2017 Jul; 78(1):264-270. PubMed ID: 27509836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Magnetic susceptibility anisotropy outside the central nervous system.
Dibb R; Xie L; Wei H; Liu C
NMR Biomed; 2017 Apr; 30(4):. PubMed ID: 27199082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
