BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26703056)

  • 1. Anthropometric Analysis of the Face.
    Zacharopoulos GV; Manios A; Kau CH; Velagrakis G; Tzanakakis GN; de Bree E
    J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Jan; 27(1):e71-5. PubMed ID: 26703056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Sudanese female face: normative craniofacial measurements and comparison with African-American and North American White females.
    Salah M; Higzi MA; Ali RW; Naini FB
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1704-9. PubMed ID: 25012648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Craniofacial morphologic parameters in a Persian population: an anthropometric study.
    Amini F; Mashayekhi Z; Rahimi H; Morad G
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 25(5):1874-81. PubMed ID: 25203584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Proportion indices in the craniofacial regions of 284 healthy North American white children between 1 and 5 years of age.
    Farkas LG; Hreczko TM; Katic MJ; Forrest CR
    J Craniofac Surg; 2003 Jan; 14(1):13-28. PubMed ID: 12544216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do the neoclassical canons still describe the beauty of faces? An anthropometric study on 50 Caucasian models.
    Torsello F; Mirigliani L; D'Alessio R; Deli R
    Prog Orthod; 2010; 11(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 20529624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Vertical and horizontal neoclassical facial canons in Turkish young adults.
    Bozkir MG; Karakas P; Oguz O
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2004 Jun; 26(3):212-9. PubMed ID: 14625792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Three-dimensional analysis of facial morphology.
    Liu Y; Kau CH; Talbert L; Pan F
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 25(5):1890-4. PubMed ID: 25072972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is it possible to use cross-sectional and vertical facial measurements to establish the shape of the mandibular arch?
    El Haje OA; Pompeo DD; Furtado GC; Rivera LM; Paranhos LR
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Nov; 15(6):735-9. PubMed ID: 25825099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A three-dimensional evaluation of Māori and New Zealand European faces.
    Antoun JS; Lawrence C; Leow A; Rongo R; Dias G; Farella M
    Aust Orthod J; 2014 Nov; 30(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 25549519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of craniofacial characteristics of typical Chinese and Caucasian young adults.
    Gu Y; McNamara JA; Sigler LM; Baccetti T
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Apr; 33(2):205-11. PubMed ID: 20709723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three-dimensional anthropometric analysis of chinese faces and its application in evaluating facial deformity.
    Dong Y; Zhao Y; Bai S; Wu G; Zhou L; Wang B
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Apr; 69(4):1195-206. PubMed ID: 21050632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relation between anthropometric and cephalometric measurements and proportions of the face of healthy young white adult men and women.
    Budai M; Farkas LG; Tompson B; Katic M; Forrest CR
    J Craniofac Surg; 2003 Mar; 14(2):154-61; discussion 162-3. PubMed ID: 12621284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantifying the selection of maxillary anterior teeth using intraoral and extraoral anatomical landmarks.
    Ellakwa A; McNamara K; Sandhu J; James K; Arora A; Klineberg I; El-Sheikh A; Martin FE
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Nov; 12(6):414-21. PubMed ID: 22269230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The application and correlation of Pont's Index to the facial framework of three main ethnic groups in Malaysia.
    Purmal K; Alam MK; Moganadass DD; Zakariat NN; Cheong NW
    Aust Orthod J; 2013 May; 29(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 23785936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Soft tissue cephalometric norms for a North Indian population group using Legan and Burstone analysis.
    Jain P; Kalra JP
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 40(3):255-9. PubMed ID: 20965694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A 3D analysis of Caucasian and African American facial morphologies in a US population.
    Talbert L; Kau CH; Christou T; Vlachos C; Souccar N
    J Orthod; 2014 Mar; 41(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 24671286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Three-dimensional facial distances of Northern Sudanese persons from childhood to young adulthood.
    Sforza C; Dolci C; Tommasi DG; Pisoni L; De Menezes M; Elamin F
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):e318-26. PubMed ID: 24290254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relationship between dental arch width and vertical facial morphology in untreated adults.
    Forster CM; Sunga E; Chung CH
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Jun; 30(3):288-94. PubMed ID: 18263889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three-dimensional facial architecture in normodivergent class I Caucasian subjects.
    Ghoubril JV; Abou Obeid FM
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2013 Jun; 36(142):5-14. PubMed ID: 24073535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of facial anthropometric parameters in 11-17 year old boys.
    Jahanbin A; Mahdavishahri N; Baghayeripour M; Esmaily H; Eslami N
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2012; 37(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 23342574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.