These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26703056)

  • 21. Soft-tissue facial characteristics of attractive and normal adolescent boys and girls.
    Sforza C; Laino A; D'Alessio R; Grandi G; Tartaglia GM; Ferrario VF
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Sep; 78(5):799-807. PubMed ID: 18298221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cephalometric norms of a Burkina Faso population.
    Ouédraogo Y; Benyahia H; Diouf JS; Camara T; Bationo R; Ngom PI
    Int Orthod; 2019 Mar; 17(1):136-142. PubMed ID: 30772356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Soft tissue morphology of Jordanian adolescents.
    Hamdan AM
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Jan; 80(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 19852644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of some facial anthropometric parameters in an Iranian population: infancy through adolescence.
    Jahanbin A; Rashed R; Yazdani R; Shahri NM; Kianifar H
    J Craniofac Surg; 2013 May; 24(3):941-5. PubMed ID: 23714916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. McNamara norms for Turkish adolescents with balanced faces and normal occlusion.
    Kilic N; Catal G; Oktay H
    Aust Orthod J; 2010 May; 26(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 20575197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Soft tissue outcome after mandibular advancement--an anthropometric evaluation of 171 consecutive patients.
    Raschke GF; Rieger UM; Bader RD; Guentsch A; Schaefer O; Schultze-Mosgau S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jun; 17(5):1415-23. PubMed ID: 22893037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of facial morphologies between adult Chinese and Houstonian Caucasian populations using three-dimensional imaging.
    Wirthlin J; Kau CH; English JD; Pan F; Zhou H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Sep; 42(9):1100-7. PubMed ID: 23623784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Facial anthropometry in newborns in Pondicherry.
    Shah M; Verma IC; Mahadevan S; Puri RK
    Indian J Pediatr; 1991; 58(2):259-63. PubMed ID: 1879908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A 3-dimensional anthropometric evaluation of facial morphology among Chinese and Greek population.
    Liu Y; Kau CH; Pan F; Zhou H; Zhang Q; Zacharopoulos GV
    J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Jul; 24(4):e353-8. PubMed ID: 23851867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Anterior projection of the maxillomandibular soft tissue complex after surgical correction of maxillary hypoplasia: a Scottish perspective.
    O'Donovan M; Khambay BS
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 52(10):934-9. PubMed ID: 25241038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cumulative frequency distribution in East Asian facial widths using the facial golden mask.
    Lee JH; Kim TG; Park GW; Kim YH
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 20(5):1378-82. PubMed ID: 19816261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Neoclassical facial canons in young adults.
    Zacharopoulos GV; Manios A; De Bree E; Kau CH; Petousis M; Zacharopoulou I; Kouremenos N
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 23(6):1693-8. PubMed ID: 23147325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Soft tissue profile in white Brazilian adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces.
    Scavone H; Zahn-Silva W; do Valle-Corotti KM; Nahás AC
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Jan; 78(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 18193966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Proportionality in Asian and North American Caucasian faces using neoclassical facial canons as criteria.
    Le TT; Farkas LG; Ngim RC; Levin LS; Forrest CR
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2002; 26(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 11891603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Three-dimensional analysis of soft tissue changes in full-face view after surgical correction of skeletal class III malocclusion.
    Yuan L; Shen G; Wu Y; Jiang L; Yang Z; Liu J; Mao L; Fang B
    J Craniofac Surg; 2013 May; 24(3):725-30. PubMed ID: 23714867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Agreement between cranial and facial classification through clinical observation and anthropometric measurement among Envigado school children.
    Torres-Restrepo AM; Quintero-Monsalve AM; Giraldo-Mira JF; Rueda ZV; Vélez-Trujillo N; Botero-Mariaca P
    BMC Oral Health; 2014 May; 14():50. PubMed ID: 24886038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The maxillary incisor display at rest: analysis of the underlying components.
    Jeelani W; Fida M; Shaikh A
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2018; 23(6):48-55. PubMed ID: 30672985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Craniofacial morphometry by photographic evaluations.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Miani A; Tartaglia G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Apr; 103(4):327-37. PubMed ID: 8480698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Three-Dimensional Anthropometric Evaluation of Facial Morphology.
    Celebi AA; Kau CH; Ozaydin B
    J Craniofac Surg; 2017 Jul; 28(5):e470-e474. PubMed ID: 28665846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Standards of soft tissue Arnett analysis for surgical planning in Turkish adults.
    Uysal T; Yagci A; Basciftci FA; Sisman Y
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):449-56. PubMed ID: 19482876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.