These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26703624)

  • 21. Robust self-calibration three-dimensional shape measurement in fringe-projection photogrammetry.
    Xiao YL; Xue J; Su X
    Opt Lett; 2013 Mar; 38(5):694-6. PubMed ID: 23455268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. 3D palmprint and hand imaging system based on full-field composite color sinusoidal fringe projection technique.
    Zhang Z; Huang S; Xu Y; Chen C; Zhao Y; Gao N; Xiao Y
    Appl Opt; 2013 Sep; 52(25):6138-45. PubMed ID: 24085070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Absolute three-dimensional shape measurement using coded fringe patterns without phase unwrapping or projector calibration.
    Lohry W; Chen V; Zhang S
    Opt Express; 2014 Jan; 22(2):1287-301. PubMed ID: 24515134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Calibration of an array projector used for high-speed three-dimensional shape measurements using a single camera.
    Wong E; Heist S; Bräuer-Burchardt C; Babovsky H; Kowarschik R
    Appl Opt; 2018 Sep; 57(26):7570-7578. PubMed ID: 30461823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Coherent digital demodulation of single-camera N-projections for 3D-object shape measurement: co-phased profilometry.
    Servin M; Garnica G; Estrada JC; Quiroga A
    Opt Express; 2013 Oct; 21(21):24873-8. PubMed ID: 24150330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. High-resolution real-time 360° 3D model reconstruction of a handheld object with fringe projection profilometry.
    Qian J; Feng S; Tao T; Hu Y; Liu K; Wu S; Chen Q; Zuo C
    Opt Lett; 2019 Dec; 44(23):5751-5754. PubMed ID: 31774770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Improved geometrical model of fringe projection profilometry.
    Huang Z; Xi J; Yu Y; Guo Q; Song L
    Opt Express; 2014 Dec; 22(26):32220-32. PubMed ID: 25607188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Depth extraction of 3D objects using axially distributed image sensing.
    Hong SP; Shin D; Lee BG; Kim ES
    Opt Express; 2012 Oct; 20(21):23044-52. PubMed ID: 23188268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Flexible geometrical calibration for fringe-reflection optical three-dimensional shape measurement.
    Yuan T; Zhang F; Tao X; Zhang X; Zhou R
    Appl Opt; 2015 Nov; 54(31):9102-7. PubMed ID: 26560561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A multi-view time-domain non-contact diffuse optical tomography scanner with dual wavelength detection for intrinsic and fluorescence small animal imaging.
    Lapointe E; Pichette J; Bérubé-Lauzière Y
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2012 Jun; 83(6):063703. PubMed ID: 22755630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of light refraction on the accuracy of camera calibration and reconstruction in underwater motion analysis.
    Kwon YH; Casebolt JB
    Sports Biomech; 2006 Jul; 5(2):315-40. PubMed ID: 16939159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Initial evaluation of commercial optical CT-based 3D gel dosimeter.
    Islam KT; Dempsey JF; Ranade MK; Maryanski MJ; Low DA
    Med Phys; 2003 Aug; 30(8):2159-68. PubMed ID: 12945982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. 3D Laser Scanner for Underwater Manipulation.
    Palomer A; Ridao P; Youakim D; Ribas D; Forest J; Petillot Y
    Sensors (Basel); 2018 Apr; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 29617303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Simple calibration of a phase-based 3D imaging system based on uneven fringe projection.
    Zhang Z; Ma H; Zhang S; Guo T; Towers CE; Towers DP
    Opt Lett; 2011 Mar; 36(5):627-9. PubMed ID: 21368929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. High-speed scanning stroboscopic fringe-pattern projection technology for three-dimensional shape precision measurement.
    Yang G; Sun C; Wang P; Xu Y
    Appl Opt; 2014 Jan; 53(2):174-83. PubMed ID: 24514046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparative analysis between active and passive techniques for underwater 3D reconstruction of close-range objects.
    Bianco G; Gallo A; Bruno F; Muzzupappa M
    Sensors (Basel); 2013 Aug; 13(8):11007-31. PubMed ID: 23966193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of light refraction on the accuracy of camera calibration and reconstruction in underwater motion analysis.
    Kwon YH; Casebolt JB
    Sports Biomech; 2006 Jan; 5(1):95-120. PubMed ID: 16521625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Action Sport Cameras as an Instrument to Perform a 3D Underwater Motion Analysis.
    Bernardina GR; Cerveri P; Barros RM; Marins JC; Silvatti AP
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0160490. PubMed ID: 27513846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Modulation measuring profilometry with auto-synchronous phase shifting and vertical scanning.
    Zhong M; Su X; Chen W; You Z; Lu M; Jing H
    Opt Express; 2014 Dec; 22(26):31620-34. PubMed ID: 25607133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. High-accuracy calibration method for an underwater one-mirror galvanometric laser scanner.
    Li X; Chen X; Li W; Yin X; Yuan X; Chen H; Zhou J; Ma X
    Opt Express; 2023 Feb; 31(4):5973-5989. PubMed ID: 36823866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.