BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

328 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26703974)

  • 1. MixChIP: a probabilistic method for cell type specific protein-DNA binding analysis.
    Rautio S; Lähdesmäki H
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Dec; 16():413. PubMed ID: 26703974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. BinDNase: a discriminatory approach for transcription factor binding prediction using DNase I hypersensitivity data.
    Kähärä J; Lähdesmäki H
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Sep; 31(17):2852-9. PubMed ID: 25957350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing the model transferability for prediction of transcription factor binding sites based on chromatin accessibility.
    Liu S; Zibetti C; Wan J; Wang G; Blackshaw S; Qian J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Jul; 18(1):355. PubMed ID: 28750606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. TICA: Transcriptional Interaction and Coregulation Analyzer.
    Perna S; Pinoli P; Ceri S; Wong L
    Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics; 2018 Oct; 16(5):342-353. PubMed ID: 30578913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transcription factor-binding k-mer analysis clarifies the cell type dependency of binding specificities and cis-regulatory SNPs in humans.
    Tahara S; Tsuchiya T; Matsumoto H; Ozaki H
    BMC Genomics; 2023 Oct; 24(1):597. PubMed ID: 37805453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. iTAR: a web server for identifying target genes of transcription factors using ChIP-seq or ChIP-chip data.
    Yang CC; Andrews EH; Chen MH; Wang WY; Chen JJ; Gerstein M; Liu CC; Cheng C
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Aug; 17(1):632. PubMed ID: 27519564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Imputation for transcription factor binding predictions based on deep learning.
    Qin Q; Feng J
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Feb; 13(2):e1005403. PubMed ID: 28234893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cell-type and transcription factor specific enrichment of transcriptional cofactor motifs in ENCODE ChIP-seq data.
    Goi C; Little P; Xie C
    BMC Genomics; 2013; 14 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S2. PubMed ID: 24564528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. ChIPulate: A comprehensive ChIP-seq simulation pipeline.
    Datta V; Hannenhalli S; Siddharthan R
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Mar; 15(3):e1006921. PubMed ID: 30897079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Chromatin immunoprecipitation and multiplex sequencing (ChIP-Seq) to identify global transcription factor binding sites in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans.
    Brdlik CM; Niu W; Snyder M
    Methods Enzymol; 2014; 539():89-111. PubMed ID: 24581441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. PscanChIP: Finding over-represented transcription factor-binding site motifs and their correlations in sequences from ChIP-Seq experiments.
    Zambelli F; Pesole G; Pavesi G
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2013 Jul; 41(Web Server issue):W535-43. PubMed ID: 23748563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A biophysical model for analysis of transcription factor interaction and binding site arrangement from genome-wide binding data.
    He X; Chen CC; Hong F; Fang F; Sinha S; Ng HH; Zhong S
    PLoS One; 2009 Dec; 4(12):e8155. PubMed ID: 19956545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Statistics of protein-DNA binding and the total number of binding sites for a transcription factor in the mammalian genome.
    Kuznetsov VA; Singh O; Jenjaroenpun P
    BMC Genomics; 2010 Feb; 11 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S12. PubMed ID: 20158869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cell-type specificity of ChIP-predicted transcription factor binding sites.
    Håndstad T; Rye M; Močnik R; Drabløs F; Sætrom P
    BMC Genomics; 2012 Aug; 13():372. PubMed ID: 22863112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Revealing transcription factor and histone modification co-localization and dynamics across cell lines by integrating ChIP-seq and RNA-seq data.
    Zhang L; Xue G; Liu J; Li Q; Wang Y
    BMC Genomics; 2018 Dec; 19(Suppl 10):914. PubMed ID: 30598100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A map of direct TF-DNA interactions in the human genome.
    Gheorghe M; Sandve GK; Khan A; Chèneby J; Ballester B; Mathelier A
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2019 Feb; 47(4):e21. PubMed ID: 30517703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inferring transcription factor complexes from ChIP-seq data.
    Whitington T; Frith MC; Johnson J; Bailey TL
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2011 Aug; 39(15):e98. PubMed ID: 21602262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An efficient method to transcription factor binding sites imputation via simultaneous completion of multiple matrices with positional consistency.
    Guo WL; Huang DS
    Mol Biosyst; 2017 Aug; 13(9):1827-1837. PubMed ID: 28718849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. MOCCS: Clarifying DNA-binding motif ambiguity using ChIP-Seq data.
    Ozaki H; Iwasaki W
    Comput Biol Chem; 2016 Aug; 63():62-72. PubMed ID: 26971251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relative avidity, specificity, and sensitivity of transcription factor-DNA binding in genome-scale experiments.
    Kuznetsov VA
    Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 563():15-50. PubMed ID: 19597778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.