These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26704085)

  • 1. Population Outcomes of Three Approaches to Detection of Congenital Hearing Loss.
    Wake M; Ching TY; Wirth K; Poulakis Z; Mensah FK; Gold L; King A; Bryson HE; Reilly S; Rickards F
    Pediatrics; 2016 Jan; 137(1):. PubMed ID: 26704085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Projected cost-effectiveness of statewide universal newborn hearing screening.
    Keren R; Helfand M; Homer C; McPhillips H; Lieu TA
    Pediatrics; 2002 Nov; 110(5):855-64. PubMed ID: 12415021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Newborn hearing screening: the great omission.
    Mehl AL; Thomson V
    Pediatrics; 1998 Jan; 101(1):E4. PubMed ID: 9417168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mild-moderate congenital hearing loss: secular trends in outcomes across four systems of detection.
    Carew P; Mensah FK; Rance G; Flynn T; Poulakis Z; Wake M
    Child Care Health Dev; 2018 Jan; 44(1):71-82. PubMed ID: 28612343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing the clinical effectiveness of different new-born hearing screening strategies. A decision analysis.
    Grill E; Hessel F; Siebert U; Schnell-Inderst P; Kunze S; Nickisch A; Wasem J
    BMC Public Health; 2005 Jan; 5():12. PubMed ID: 15679901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Developmental outcomes of children with hearing loss born in Colorado hospitals with and without universal newborn hearing screening programs.
    Yoshinaga-Itano C; Coulter D; Thomson V
    Semin Neonatol; 2001 Dec; 6(6):521-9. PubMed ID: 12014893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A programme of studies including assessment of diagnostic accuracy of school hearing screening tests and a cost-effectiveness model of school entry hearing screening programmes.
    Fortnum H; Ukoumunne OC; Hyde C; Taylor RS; Ozolins M; Errington S; Zhelev Z; Pritchard C; Benton C; Moody J; Cocking L; Watson J; Roberts S
    Health Technol Assess; 2016 May; 20(36):1-178. PubMed ID: 27169435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A universal newborn hearing screening program in Taiwan.
    Lin HC; Shu MT; Chang KC; Bruna SM
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2002 May; 63(3):209-18. PubMed ID: 11997156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Universal newborn hearing screening: systematic review to update the 2001 US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation.
    Nelson HD; Bougatsos C; Nygren P;
    Pediatrics; 2008 Jul; 122(1):e266-76. PubMed ID: 18595973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Levels of evidence: universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) and early hearing detection and intervention systems (EHDI).
    Yoshinaga-Itano C
    J Commun Disord; 2004; 37(5):451-65. PubMed ID: 15231425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Universal newborn hearing screening: summary of evidence.
    Thompson DC; McPhillips H; Davis RL; Lieu TL; Homer CJ; Helfand M
    JAMA; 2001 Oct 24-31; 286(16):2000-10. PubMed ID: 11667937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Current practice, accuracy, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the school entry hearing screen.
    Bamford J; Fortnum H; Bristow K; Smith J; Vamvakas G; Davies L; Taylor R; Watkin P; Fonseca S; Davis A; Hind S
    Health Technol Assess; 2007 Aug; 11(32):1-168, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 17683682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neonatal hearing screening: modelling cost and effectiveness of hospital- and community-based screening.
    Grill E; Uus K; Hessel F; Davies L; Taylor RS; Wasem J; Bamford J
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2006 Feb; 6():14. PubMed ID: 16504089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Six year effectiveness of a population based two tier infant hearing screening programme.
    Russ SA; Rickards F; Poulakis Z; Barker M; Saunders K; Wake M
    Arch Dis Child; 2002 Apr; 86(4):245-50. PubMed ID: 11919095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An Economic Evaluation of Australia's Newborn Hearing Screening Program: A Within-Study Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
    Sharma R; Gu Y; Sinha K; Ching TYC; Marnane V; Gold L; Wake M; Wang J; Parkinson B
    Ear Hear; 2022; 43(3):972-983. PubMed ID: 34772837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effectiveness of the promotion of newborn hearing screening in Taiwan.
    Huang CM; Yang IY; Ma YC; Lin GS; Yang CC; Tsai HT; Lin HC
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Jan; 78(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 24300945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Acceptability, benefit and costs of early screening for hearing disability: a study of potential screening tests and models.
    Davis A; Smith P; Ferguson M; Stephens D; Gianopoulos I
    Health Technol Assess; 2007 Oct; 11(42):1-294. PubMed ID: 17927921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prevalence of permanent childhood hearing loss detected at the universal newborn hearing screen: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Butcher E; Dezateux C; Cortina-Borja M; Knowles RL
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0219600. PubMed ID: 31295316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The cost-effectiveness of universal newborn screening for bilateral permanent congenital hearing impairment: systematic review.
    Colgan S; Gold L; Wirth K; Ching T; Poulakis Z; Rickards F; Wake M
    Acad Pediatr; 2012; 12(3):171-80. PubMed ID: 22583631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Universal newborn hearing screening--the Colorado story.
    Downs MP
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 1995 Jul; 32(3):257-9. PubMed ID: 7665273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.