296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26704861)
1. Effective dose reduction in spine radiographic imaging by choosing the less radiation-sensitive side of the body.
Ben-Shlomo A; Bartal G; Mosseri M; Avraham B; Leitner Y; Shabat S
Spine J; 2016 Apr; 16(4):558-63. PubMed ID: 26704861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of the VIP-Man model to calculate energy imparted and effective dose for x-ray examinations.
Winslow M; Huda W; Xu XG; Chao TC; Shi CY; Ogden KM; Scalzetti EM
Health Phys; 2004 Feb; 86(2):174-82. PubMed ID: 14744051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effective dose and breast dose reduction in paediatric scoliosis X-ray radiography by an optimal positioning.
Ben-Shlomo A; Bartal G; Shabat S; Mosseri M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013; 156(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 23511710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of PCXMC for patients with different body size in chest and abdominal x ray examinations: a Monte Carlo simulation study.
Borrego D; Lowe EM; Kitahara CM; Lee C
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Mar; 63(6):065015. PubMed ID: 29465419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. PATIENT RADIATION DOSE FROM CHEST X-RAY EXAMINATIONS IN THE WEST BANK-PALESTINE.
Lahham A; Issa A; ALMasri H
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Feb; 178(3):298-303. PubMed ID: 28981835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Monte Carlo estimation of effective dose in chest tomosynthesis.
Sabol JM
Med Phys; 2009 Dec; 36(12):5480-7. PubMed ID: 20095260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiation dose for pediatric scoliosis patients undergoing whole spine radiography: Effect of the radiographic length in an auto-stitching digital radiography system.
Hwang YS; Lai PL; Tsai HY; Kung YC; Lin YY; He RJ; Wu CT
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Nov; 108():99-106. PubMed ID: 30396678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. PATIENT DOSES IN COMMON DIAGNOSTIC X-RAY EXAMINATIONS.
Metaxas VI; Messaris GA; Lekatou AN; Petsas TG; Panayiotakis GS
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Jul; 184(1):12-27. PubMed ID: 30289498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reduction of radiation risks in patients undergoing some X-ray examinations by using optimal projections: A Monte Carlo program-based mathematical calculation.
Chaparian A; Kanani A; Baghbanian M
J Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 39(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 24600170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of Localizer Radiography Projection on Organ Dose at Chest CT with Automatic Tube Current Modulation.
Saltybaeva N; Krauss A; Alkadhi H
Radiology; 2017 Mar; 282(3):842-849. PubMed ID: 27548276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An assessment of the dose and image quality difference between AP and PA positioned adult radiographic knee examinations.
Lockwood P; Mitchell M
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2023 Mar; 54(1):123-134. PubMed ID: 36646545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Posture-specific phantoms representing female and male adults in Monte Carlo-based simulations for radiological protection.
Cassola VF; Kramer R; Brayner C; Khoury HJ
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(15):4399-430. PubMed ID: 20647610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Differences in effective dose and energy imparted estimation from PA-AP, RLAT-LLAT projections in pediatric full spine x-ray examination using the Monte Carlo technique.
Gialousis GI; Yakoumakis EN; Papadopoulou DI; Makri TK; Yakoumakis NE; Dimitriou PA; Georgiou EK
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jan; 51(2):287-97. PubMed ID: 16394339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lifetime attributable risk of cancer incidence and mortality in routine digital radiology procedures.
Zangeneh M; Deevband MR; Mohsenzadeh B
Clin Imaging; 2020 Nov; 67():226-236. PubMed ID: 32871427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The UF series of tomographic computational phantoms of pediatric patients.
Lee C; Williams JL; Lee C; Bolch WE
Med Phys; 2005 Dec; 32(12):3537-48. PubMed ID: 16475752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Radiation exposure of children in pediatric radiology. Part 3: Conversion coefficients for reconstruction of organ doses achieved during chest X-ray examinations].
Seidenbusch MC; Regulla D; Schneider K
Rofo; 2008 Dec; 180(12):1061-81. PubMed ID: 19235700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Gridless adult cervical spine radiography and its' effect on image quality and radiation dose: A phantom study.
Mekis N; Bianchi T; Doyle C; Gauchat M; Geerling I; Linneman J; Staats S; Campeanu C
Radiography (Lond); 2024 Jan; 30(1):359-366. PubMed ID: 38141429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Conversion coefficients for determining organ doses in paediatric spine radiography.
Seidenbusch M; Schneider K
Pediatr Radiol; 2014 Apr; 44(4):434-56. PubMed ID: 24509648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Radiation exposure of children in pediatric radiology--part 2: the PAEDOS algorithm for computer-assisted dose reconstruction in pediatric radiology and results for X-ray examinations of the skull].
Seidenbusch MC; Regulla D; Schneider K
Rofo; 2008 Jun; 180(6):522-39. PubMed ID: 18484514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. ESTIMATION OF THE ORGAN AND EFFECTIVE DOSE TO PATIENTS UNDERGOING MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC X-RAY EXAMINATIONS IN SAUDI ARABIA.
Ababneh ZQ; Almusallam M; Alfajri I; Ababneh AM; Aljarrah KM; Tries MA; Al Anazi N
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2021 May; 194(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 33940619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
