These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2670589)

  • 1. Bond strengths of two integral bracket-base combinations: an in vitro comparison with foil-mesh.
    Regan D; van Noort R
    Eur J Orthod; 1989 May; 11(2):144-53. PubMed ID: 2670589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Alternatives to ceramic brackets: the tensile bond strengths of two aesthetic brackets compared ex vivo with stainless steel foil-mesh bracket bases.
    Arici S; Regan D
    Br J Orthod; 1997 May; 24(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 9218111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of recycling on the tensile bond strength of new and clinically used stainless steel orthodontic brackets: an in vitro study.
    Regan D; van Noort R; O'Keeffe C
    Br J Orthod; 1990 May; 17(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 2192762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retentive shear strengths of various bonding attachment bases.
    Lopez JI
    Am J Orthod; 1980 Jun; 77(6):669-78. PubMed ID: 6992590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bond strength evaluation of ceramic and stainless steel bracket bases subjected to cyclic tensile loading.
    Soderquist SA; Drummond JL; Evans CA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Feb; 129(2):175.e7-175.e12. PubMed ID: 16473707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of three bracket bases: an in vitro study.
    Smith NR; Reynolds IR
    Br J Orthod; 1991 Feb; 18(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 1827348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Variables influencing the bond strength of metal orthodontic bracket bases.
    Maijer R; Smith DC
    Am J Orthod; 1981 Jan; 79(1):20-34. PubMed ID: 6450539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bond strength of orthodontic direct-bonding cement-plastic bracket systems in vitro.
    de Pulido LG; Powers JM
    Am J Orthod; 1983 Feb; 83(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 6337499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bond strengths of an integral bracket-base combination: an in vitro study.
    Ferguson JW; Read MJ; Watts DC
    Eur J Orthod; 1984 Nov; 6(4):267-76. PubMed ID: 6391941
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tensile and shear strength of orthodontic bracket bonding with glass ionomer cement and acrylic resin. An in vitro comparison.
    Norevall LI; Sjögren G; Persson M
    Swed Dent J; 1990; 14(6):275-84. PubMed ID: 2096476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Shear, torsional, and tensile bond strengths of ceramic brackets using three adhesive filler concentrations.
    Ostertag AJ; Dhuru VB; Ferguson DJ; Meyer RA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Sep; 100(3):251-8. PubMed ID: 1877551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of various methods of chlorhexidine application on shear bond strength.
    Bishara SE; Vonwald L; Zamtua J; Damon PL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Aug; 114(2):150-3. PubMed ID: 9714279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of fourteen direct-bonding orthodontic bases.
    Dickinson PT; Powers JM
    Am J Orthod; 1980 Dec; 78(6):630-9. PubMed ID: 7006404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of adhesion forces developed by foil mesh of various dimensions applied in combination with composites of different viscosity.
    Lombardo L; Bulli C; Mirabella D; Bonetti AG; Siciliani G
    Int Orthod; 2013 Sep; 11(3):290-302. PubMed ID: 23867333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of finite element analysis with in vitro bond strength tests of the bracket-cement-enamel system.
    Algera TJ; Feilzer AJ; Prahl-Andersen B; Kleverlaan CJ
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec; 33(6):608-12. PubMed ID: 21131391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of bracket base design on the strength of the bracket-cement interface.
    Knox J; Hubsch P; Jones ML; Middleton J
    J Orthod; 2000 Sep; 27(3):249-54. PubMed ID: 11099557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Residual debris and bond strength--is there a relationship?
    O'Brien KD; Watts DC; Read MJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1988 Sep; 94(3):222-30. PubMed ID: 3046329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Shear bond strength of ceramic orthodontic brackets to enamel.
    Britton JC; McInnes P; Weinberg R; Ledoux WR; Retief DH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Oct; 98(4):348-53. PubMed ID: 2145756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bonding bases coated with porous metal powder: a comparison with foil mesh.
    Hanson GH; Gibbon WM; Shimizu H
    Am J Orthod; 1983 Jan; 83(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 6336902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of variation in mesh-base design on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.
    Bishara SE; Soliman MM; Oonsombat C; Laffoon JF; Ajlouni R
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Jun; 74(3):400-4. PubMed ID: 15264654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.