135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26705898)
1. The influence of action execution on end-state comfort and underlying movement kinematics: An examination of right and left handed participants.
Scharoun SM; Gonzalez DA; Bryden PJ; Roy EA
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Feb; 164():1-9. PubMed ID: 26705898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How the mode of action affects evidence of planning and movement kinematics in aging: End-state comfort in older adults.
Scharoun SM; Gonzalez DA; Roy EA; Bryden PJ
Dev Psychobiol; 2016 May; 58(4):439-49. PubMed ID: 26617081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of action possibility and end-state comfort on motor imagery of manual action sequences.
Seegelke C; Hughes CM
Brain Cogn; 2015 Dec; 101():12-6. PubMed ID: 26544603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Limits of end-state planning.
Hermens F; Kral D; Rosenbaum DA
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 May; 148():148-62. PubMed ID: 24531145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An investigation into manual asymmetries in grasp behavior and kinematics during an object manipulation task.
Seegelke C; Hughes CM; Schack T
Exp Brain Res; 2011 Nov; 215(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 21938544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perturbations in action goal influence bimanual grasp posture planning.
Hughes CM; Seegelke C
J Mot Behav; 2013; 45(6):473-8. PubMed ID: 24006878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Combined effects of planning and execution constraints on bimanual task performance.
Janssen L; Beuting M; Meulenbroek R; Steenbergen B
Exp Brain Res; 2009 Jan; 192(1):61-73. PubMed ID: 18751972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Motor planning and execution in left- and right-handed individuals during a bimanual grasping and placing task.
Hughes CM; Reissig P; Seegelke C
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):111-8. PubMed ID: 21663882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Physically coupling two objects in a bimanual task alters kinematics but not end-state comfort.
Hughes CM; Haddad JM; Franz EA; Zelaznik HN; Ryu JH
Exp Brain Res; 2011 Jun; 211(2):219-29. PubMed ID: 21484393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Planning for manual positioning: the end-state comfort effect for manual abduction-adduction.
Zhang W; Rosenbaum DA
Exp Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 184(3):383-9. PubMed ID: 17763845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. End-State Comfort Across the Lifespan: A Cross-Sectional Investigation of How Movement Context Influences Motor Planning in an Overturned Glass Task.
Scharoun SM; Gonzalez DA; Roy EA; Bryden PJ
Motor Control; 2018 Apr; 22(2):211-230. PubMed ID: 28771106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of stimulus cueing on bimanual grasp posture planning.
Hughes CM; Seegelke C; Reissig P; Schütz C
Exp Brain Res; 2012 Jun; 219(3):391-401. PubMed ID: 22562588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Behavioral evidence for left-hemisphere specialization of motor planning.
Janssen L; Meulenbroek RG; Steenbergen B
Exp Brain Res; 2011 Mar; 209(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 21184219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evidence for right-hand feeding biases in a left-handed population.
Flindall JW; Stone KD; Gonzalez CL
Laterality; 2015 May; 20(3):287-305. PubMed ID: 25256315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. End-state comfort in two object manipulation tasks: Investigating how the movement context influences planning in children, young adults, and older adults.
Scharoun Benson SM; Roy EA; Bryden PJ
Dev Psychobiol; 2018 Apr; 60(3):317-323. PubMed ID: 29411871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Individual differences in motor planning during a multi-segment object manipulation task.
Seegelke C; Hughes CM; Schütz C; Schack T
Exp Brain Res; 2012 Oct; 222(1-2):125-36. PubMed ID: 22885998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Manual asymmetries in the kinematics of a reach-to-grasp action.
Flindall JW; Doan JB; Gonzalez CL
Laterality; 2014; 19(4):489-507. PubMed ID: 24350797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of initial and final precision on motor planning: individual differences in end-state comfort during unimanual grasping and placing.
Hughes CM; Seegelke C; Schack T
J Mot Behav; 2012; 44(3):195-201. PubMed ID: 22551086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The influence of time constraints on posture choices during an end-state comfort task.
Modersitzki R; Studenka BE
Hum Mov Sci; 2020 Jun; 71():102618. PubMed ID: 32452435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influences of grasp selection in typically developing children.
Wilmut K; Byrne M
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 May; 148():181-7. PubMed ID: 24594384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
