These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26705935)

  • 1. Long-term retention behaviour of resin matrix attachment systems for overdentures.
    Passia N; Ghazal M; Kern M
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Apr; 57():88-94. PubMed ID: 26705935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Retention and wear of resin matrix attachments for implant overdentures.
    Wichmann N; Kern M; Taylor T; Wille S; Passia N
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Oct; 110():103901. PubMed ID: 32957206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Retentive Properties of Two Stud Attachments with Polyetherketoneketone or Nylon Insert in Mandibular Implant Overdentures.
    Choi JW; Yun BH; Jeong CM; Huh JB
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(5):1079-1088. PubMed ID: 30231095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of two resilient attachment systems for implant-/mucosa-supported overdentures with a PEKK framework: a clinical pilot study.
    Dörsam I; Hombach A; Bourauel C; Stark H
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Apr; 26(4):3707-3719. PubMed ID: 34935067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The in vitro effect of different implant angulations and cyclic dislodgement on the retentive properties of an overdenture attachment system.
    Al-Ghafli SA; Michalakis KX; Hirayama H; Kang K
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 19703620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative study of four retentive anchor systems for implant supported overdentures--retention force changes.
    Bayer S; Steinheuser D; Grüner M; Keilig L; Enkling N; Stark H; Mues S
    Gerodontology; 2009 Dec; 26(4):268-72. PubMed ID: 19371390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of in vitro cyclic dislodging on retentive force and removal torque of three overdenture attachment systems.
    Kobayashi M; Srinivasan M; Ammann P; Perriard J; Ohkubo C; Müller F; Belser UC; Schimmel M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Apr; 25(4):426-34. PubMed ID: 23566266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical performance and material properties of single-implant overdenture attachment systems.
    Alsabeeha NH; Swain MV; Payne AG
    Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(3):247-54. PubMed ID: 21519573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attachment systems for implant overdenture: influence of implant inclination on retentive and lateral forces.
    Yang TC; Maeda Y; Gonda T; Kotecha S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Nov; 22(11):1315-9. PubMed ID: 21426402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of retention and wear of ball attachments.
    Wolf K; Ludwig K; Hartfil H; Kern M
    Quintessence Int; 2009 May; 40(5):405-12. PubMed ID: 19582245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retention forces of spherical attachments as a function of implant and matrix angulation in mandibular overdentures: an in vitro study.
    Ortegón SM; Thompson GA; Agar JR; Taylor TD; Perdikis D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 19328276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prosthodontic maintenance of overdentures on zirconia implants: 1-year results of a randomized controlled trial.
    Osman RB; Ma S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(5):461-8. PubMed ID: 25191890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of retention and strain energies of stud attachments for implant overdentures.
    Petropoulos VC; Mante FK
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Jun; 20(4):286-93. PubMed ID: 21539646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Testing the retention of attachments for implant overdentures - validation of an original force measurement system.
    Fromentin O; Lassauzay C; Abi Nader S; Feine J; de Albuquerque Junior RF
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Jan; 37(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 19912482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attachment systems for mandibular two-implant overdentures: a review of in vitro investigations on retention and wear features.
    Alsabeeha NH; Payne AG; Swain MV
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(5):429-40. PubMed ID: 20095190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Methodology for measuring the in vitro seating and unseating forces of prefabricated attachment systems used to retain implant overdentures.
    Fakhry A; Tan SC; Heiner AD; Dehkordi-Vakil FH; Dircks HW
    J Prosthodont; 2010 Feb; 19(2):87-94. PubMed ID: 19895429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of interimplant divergence on the retention characteristics of locator attachments, a laboratory study.
    Stephens GJ; di Vitale N; O'Sullivan E; McDonald A
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Aug; 23(6):467-75. PubMed ID: 24750293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attachment systems for mandibular single-implant overdentures: an in vitro retention force investigation on different designs.
    Alsabeeha N; Atieh M; Swain MV; Payne AG
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 20305857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The service life of implant-retained overdenture attachment systems.
    Pigozzo MN; Mesquita MF; Henriques GE; Vaz LG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Aug; 102(2):74-80. PubMed ID: 19643220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Wear of ceramic and titanium ball attachments in subjects with an implant-retained overdenture: a controlled clinical trial.
    Büttel AE; Lüthy H; Sendi P; Marinello CP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb; 107(2):109-13. PubMed ID: 22304745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.