BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26705937)

  • 1. Survival analysis of wide dental implant: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Lee CT; Chen YW; Starr JR; Chuang SK
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Oct; 27(10):1251-1264. PubMed ID: 26705937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review.
    Wallace SS; Froum SJ
    Ann Periodontol; 2003 Dec; 8(1):328-43. PubMed ID: 14971260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is osteoporosis a risk factor for implant survival or failure?
    Grisa A; Veitz-Keenan A
    Evid Based Dent; 2018 Jun; 19(2):51-52. PubMed ID: 29930358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of implant length and diameter on survival rates.
    Renouard F; Nisand D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17 Suppl 2():35-51. PubMed ID: 16968380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Narrow-diameter implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Schiegnitz E; Al-Nawas B
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16():21-40. PubMed ID: 30328192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of survival rate and crestal bone loss of narrow diameter dental implants versus regular dental implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Alrabiah M
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2019 Feb; 10(1):e12367. PubMed ID: 30414262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical and Retrospective Evaluation of 4.1- or 4.3-mm-Diameter Implants Placed Immediately in the Molar Region: A Preliminary Study.
    Jung DW; Yoon HJ
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Mar; 74(3):489-96. PubMed ID: 26608455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of implant diameter on its survival: a meta-analysis based on prospective clinical trials.
    Ortega-Oller I; Suárez F; Galindo-Moreno P; Torrecillas-Martínez L; Monje A; Catena A; Wang HL
    J Periodontol; 2014 Apr; 85(4):569-80. PubMed ID: 23905841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A retrospective, multicenter study on a novo wide-body implant for posterior regions.
    Vandeweghe S; Ackermann A; Bronner J; Hattingh A; Tschakaloff A; De Bruyn H
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):281-92. PubMed ID: 19958373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Role of implant diameter on long-term survival of dental implants placed in posterior maxilla: a systematic review.
    Javed F; Romanos GE
    Clin Oral Investig; 2015 Jan; 19(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 25366871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A systematic review on survival and success rates of implants placed immediately into fresh extraction sockets after at least 1 year.
    Lang NP; Pun L; Lau KY; Li KY; Wong MC
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Feb; 23 Suppl 5():39-66. PubMed ID: 22211305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Platform switching for marginal bone preservation around dental implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Atieh MA; Ibrahim HM; Atieh AH
    J Periodontol; 2010 Oct; 81(10):1350-66. PubMed ID: 20575657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Immediate versus conventional loading of post-extraction implants in the edentulous jaws.
    Testori T; Zuffetti F; Capelli M; Galli F; Weinstein RL; Del Fabbro M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2014 Dec; 16(6):926-35. PubMed ID: 23506353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Do implant length and width matter for short dental implants (<10 mm)? A meta-analysis of prospective studies.
    Monje A; Fu JH; Chan HL; Suarez F; Galindo-Moreno P; Catena A; Wang HL
    J Periodontol; 2013 Dec; 84(12):1783-91. PubMed ID: 23451988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Implant stability measurements for implants placed at the time of extraction: a cohort, prospective clinical trial.
    Becker W; Sennerby L; Bedrossian E; Becker BE; Lucchini JP
    J Periodontol; 2005 Mar; 76(3):391-7. PubMed ID: 15857073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Survival of Implants Using the Osteotome Technique With or Without Grafting in the Posterior Maxilla: A Systematic Review.
    Shi JY; Gu YX; Zhuang LF; Lai HC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(5):1077-88. PubMed ID: 27632263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Early experience with Wide-Platform Mk II implants. Part I: Implant survival. Part II: Evaluation of risk factors involving implant survival.
    Eckert SE; Meraw SJ; Weaver AL; Lohse CM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(2):208-16. PubMed ID: 11324209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Immediate versus early loading of flapless placed dental implants: a systematic review.
    Xu L; Wang X; Zhang Q; Yang W; Zhu W; Zhao K
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):760-9. PubMed ID: 24831750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Retrospective analysis of 56 edentulous dental arches restored with 344 single-stage implants using an immediate loading fixed provisional protocol: statistical predictors of implant failure.
    Kinsel RP; Liss M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):823-30. PubMed ID: 17974119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Implant and prosthodontic survival rates with implant fixed complete dental prostheses in the edentulous mandible after at least 5 years: a systematic review.
    Papaspyridakos P; Mokti M; Chen CJ; Benic GI; Gallucci GO; Chronopoulos V
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2014 Oct; 16(5):705-17. PubMed ID: 23311617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.