These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26707310)
1. Different Score Systems to Predict Mortality in Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Which Is the Winner? The Experience of an Egyptian Center for Living Donor Liver Transplantation. El Amir M; Gamal Eldeen H; Mogawer S; Esmat G; El-Shazly M; El-Garem N; Abdelaziz MS; Salah A; Hosny A Transplant Proc; 2015 Dec; 47(10):2897-901. PubMed ID: 26707310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Which score system can best predict recipient outcomes after living donor liver transplantation? Chung IS; Park M; Ko JS; Gwak MS; Kim GS; Lee SK Transplant Proc; 2012 Mar; 44(2):393-5. PubMed ID: 22410025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Proposal for a New Predictive Model of Short-Term Mortality After Living Donor Liver Transplantation due to Acute Liver Failure. Chung HS; Lee YJ; Jo YS Ann Transplant; 2017 Feb; 22():101-107. PubMed ID: 28220036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is Muscle MELD a More Promising Predictor for Mortality After Living Donor Liver Transplantation? Badawy A; Kaido T; Hamaguchi Y; Anazawa T; Yagi S; Fukumitsu K; Kamo N; Okajima H; Uemoto S Prog Transplant; 2018 Sep; 28(3):213-219. PubMed ID: 29902957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Comparison study of five scoring systems for evaluating prognosis of patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt procedures]. Wen L; He S; Zhang H; Luo X Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi; 2014 Jul; 22(7):514-8. PubMed ID: 25203803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Different Scoring Systems Based on Both Donor and Recipient Characteristics for Predicting Outcome after Living Donor Liver Transplantation. Ma Y; Wang Q; Yang J; Yan L PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0136604. PubMed ID: 26378786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A revised scope in different prognostic models in cirrhotic patients: Current and future perspectives, an Egyptian experience. Hassan EA; Abd El-Rehim AS Arab J Gastroenterol; 2013 Dec; 14(4):158-64. PubMed ID: 24433645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. MELD scores with incorporation of serum sodium and death prediction in cirrhotic patients on the waiting list for liver transplantation: a single center experience in southern Brazil. Marroni CP; de Mello Brandão AB; Hennigen AW; Marroni C; Zanotelli ML; Cantisani G; Fuchs SC; Clin Transplant; 2012; 26(4):E395-401. PubMed ID: 22882694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Prognostic value of the model for end-stage liver disease combined with serum sodium levels in patients with decompensated cirrhosis]. Li JY; Deng Q; Wang Y; Xu MY; Lu LG Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi; 2012 Dec; 20(12):896-901. PubMed ID: 23522249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Application of postoperative Model for End-Stage Liver Disease scoring system for evaluating liver graft function after living donor liver transplantation. Toshima T; Ikegami T; Kimura K; Harimoto N; Yamashita Y; Yoshizumi T; Soejima Y; Ikeda T; Shirabe K; Maehara Y Transplant Proc; 2014; 46(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 24507030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score does not predict patient or graft survival in living donor liver transplant recipients. Hayashi PH; Forman L; Steinberg T; Bak T; Wachs M; Kugelmas M; Everson GT; Kam I; Trotter JF Liver Transpl; 2003 Jul; 9(7):737-40. PubMed ID: 12827562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of four models for end-stage liver disease in evaluating the prognosis of cirrhosis. Jiang M; Liu F; Xiong WJ; Zhong L; Chen XM World J Gastroenterol; 2008 Nov; 14(42):6546-50. PubMed ID: 19030210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. D-MELD as a predictor of early graft mortality in adult-to-adult living-donor liver transplantation. Ikegami T; Imai D; Wang H; Yoshizumi T; Yamashita Y; Ninomiya M; Iguchi T; Bekki Y; Shirabe K; Maehara Y Transplantation; 2014 Feb; 97(4):457-62. PubMed ID: 24531822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Different models in predicting the short-term prognosis of patients with hepatitis B virus-related acute-on-chronic liver failure. Yang WB; Chen EQ; Bi HX; Bai L; Chen XB; Feng P; Tang H Ann Hepatol; 2012; 11(3):311-9. PubMed ID: 22481448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score is prognostically superior to the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) and MELD variants following paracetamol (acetaminophen) overdose. Craig DG; Reid TW; Wright EC; Martin KG; Davidson JS; Hayes PC; Simpson KJ Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2012 Mar; 35(6):705-13. PubMed ID: 22260637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Proposal of Muscle-MELD Score, Including Muscularity, for Prediction of Mortality After Living Donor Liver Transplantation. Hamaguchi Y; Kaido T; Okumura S; Kobayashi A; Shirai H; Yagi S; Hammad A; Okajima H; Uemoto S Transplantation; 2016 Nov; 100(11):2416-2423. PubMed ID: 27495765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of four model for end-stage liver disease-based prognostic systems for cirrhosis. Huo TI; Lin HC; Huo SC; Lee PC; Wu JC; Lee FY; Hou MC; Lee SD Liver Transpl; 2008 Jun; 14(6):837-44. PubMed ID: 18508377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Living donor liver transplant versus cadaveric liver transplant survival in relation to model for end-stage liver disease score. Al Sebayel M; Abaalkhail F; Hashim A; Al Bahili H; Alabbad S; Shoukdy M; Elsiesy H Transplant Proc; 2015 May; 47(4):1211-3. PubMed ID: 26036556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Model for End Stage Liver Disease score does not predict graft survival after living donor liver transplantation. Dulundu E; Sugawara Y; Kishi Y; Akamatsu N; Kaneko J; Makuuchi M Hepatogastroenterology; 2006; 53(71):781-2. PubMed ID: 17086888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]