BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26707551)

  • 1. Comparing net survival estimators of cancer patients.
    Seppä K; Hakulinen T; Läärä E; Pitkäniemi J
    Stat Med; 2016 May; 35(11):1866-79. PubMed ID: 26707551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cancer net survival on registry data: use of the new unbiased Pohar-Perme estimator and magnitude of the bias with the classical methods.
    Roche L; Danieli C; Belot A; Grosclaude P; Bouvier AM; Velten M; Iwaz J; Remontet L; Bossard N
    Int J Cancer; 2013 May; 132(10):2359-69. PubMed ID: 22961565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Choosing the net survival method for cancer survival estimation.
    Seppä K; Hakulinen T; Pokhrel A
    Eur J Cancer; 2015 Jun; 51(9):1123-9. PubMed ID: 24183462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of different approaches to estimating age standardized net survival.
    Lambert PC; Dickman PW; Rutherford MJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Aug; 15():64. PubMed ID: 26275405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A log-rank-type test to compare net survival distributions.
    Grafféo N; Castell F; Belot A; Giorgi R
    Biometrics; 2016 Sep; 72(3):760-9. PubMed ID: 26821615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On standardized relative survival.
    Sasieni P; Brentnall AR
    Biometrics; 2017 Jun; 73(2):473-482. PubMed ID: 27554303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Challenges in the estimation of Net SURvival: The CENSUR working survival group.
    Giorgi R;
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2016 Oct; 64(5):367-371. PubMed ID: 27793412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Long-term net survival in patients with colorectal cancer in France: an informative contribution of recent methodology.
    Rollot F; Chauvenet M; Roche L; Hamza S; Lepage C; Faivre J; Bouvier AM
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2013 Oct; 56(10):1118-24. PubMed ID: 24022528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fair comparisons of cause-specific and relative survival by accounting for the systematic removal of patients from risk-sets.
    Wells M; Rutherford MJ; Lambert PC
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2023 Oct; 86():102408. PubMed ID: 37591148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Doubly robust estimator for net survival rate in analyses of cancer registry data.
    Komukai S; Hattori S
    Biometrics; 2017 Mar; 73(1):124-133. PubMed ID: 27479200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Conditional net survival: Relevant prognostic information for colorectal cancer survivors. A French population-based study.
    Drouillard A; Bouvier AM; Rollot F; Faivre J; Jooste V; Lepage C
    Dig Liver Dis; 2015 Jul; 47(7):597-601. PubMed ID: 25911573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Unbiased estimates of long-term net survival of solid cancers in France.
    Jooste V; Grosclaude P; Remontet L; Launoy G; Baldi I; Molinié F; Arveux P; Bossard N; Bouvier AM; Colonna M;
    Int J Cancer; 2013 May; 132(10):2370-7. PubMed ID: 23001495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Choosing the relative survival method for cancer survival estimation.
    Hakulinen T; Seppä K; Lambert PC
    Eur J Cancer; 2011 Sep; 47(14):2202-10. PubMed ID: 21549589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Standard errors of non-standardised and age-standardised relative survival of cancer patients.
    Jansen L; Hakulinen T; Brenner H
    Br J Cancer; 2012 Jan; 106(3):569-74. PubMed ID: 22173672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Net Survival in Survival Analyses for Patients with Cancer: A Scoping Review.
    Nagamine CML; Goulart BNG; Ziegelmann PK
    Cancers (Basel); 2022 Jul; 14(14):. PubMed ID: 35884365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Informative censoring in relative survival.
    Rebolj Kodre A; Pohar Perme M
    Stat Med; 2013 Nov; 32(27):4791-802. PubMed ID: 23761182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Correcting bias due to missing stage data in the non-parametric estimation of stage-specific net survival for colorectal cancer using multiple imputation.
    Falcaro M; Carpenter JR
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2017 Jun; 48():16-21. PubMed ID: 28315607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimating net survival: the importance of allowing for informative censoring.
    Danieli C; Remontet L; Bossard N; Roche L; Belot A
    Stat Med; 2012 Apr; 31(8):775-86. PubMed ID: 22281942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differences in cancer survival by sex: a population-based study using cancer registry data.
    Afshar N; English DR; Thursfield V; Mitchell PL; Te Marvelde L; Farrugia H; Giles GG; Milne RL
    Cancer Causes Control; 2018 Nov; 29(11):1059-1069. PubMed ID: 30194549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Direct modelling of age standardized marginal relative survival through incorporation of time-dependent weights.
    Lambert PC; Syriopoulou E; Rutherford MR
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Apr; 21(1):84. PubMed ID: 33894741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.