These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
489 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26707632)
1. Oral appliance treatment in moderate and severe obstructive sleep apnoea patients non-adherent to CPAP. Gjerde K; Lehmann S; Berge ME; Johansson AK; Johansson A J Oral Rehabil; 2016 Apr; 43(4):249-58. PubMed ID: 26707632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cardiovascular mortality in obstructive sleep apnoea treated with continuous positive airway pressure or oral appliance: an observational study. Anandam A; Patil M; Akinnusi M; Jaoude P; El-Solh AA Respirology; 2013 Nov; 18(8):1184-90. PubMed ID: 23731062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A 2-year mean follow-up of oral appliance therapy for severe obstructive sleep apnea: a cohort study. Haviv Y; Bachar G; Aframian DJ; Almoznino G; Michaeli E; Benoliel R Oral Dis; 2015 Apr; 21(3):386-92. PubMed ID: 25207802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Health outcomes of continuous positive airway pressure versus oral appliance treatment for obstructive sleep apnea: a randomized controlled trial. Phillips CL; Grunstein RR; Darendeliler MA; Mihailidou AS; Srinivasan VK; Yee BJ; Marks GB; Cistulli PA Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2013 Apr; 187(8):879-87. PubMed ID: 23413266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Oral appliance treatment outcome can be predicted by continuous positive airway pressure in moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea. Storesund A; Johansson A; Bjorvatn B; Lehmann S Sleep Breath; 2018 May; 22(2):385-392. PubMed ID: 29067558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Oral appliance versus continuous positive airway pressure in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: a 2-year follow-up. Doff MH; Hoekema A; Wijkstra PJ; van der Hoeven JH; Huddleston Slater JJ; de Bont LG; Stegenga B Sleep; 2013 Sep; 36(9):1289-96. PubMed ID: 23997361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Beneficial Effects of Long-Term CPAP Treatment on Sleep Quality and Blood Pressure in Adherent Subjects With Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Yang MC; Huang YC; Lan CC; Wu YK; Huang KF Respir Care; 2015 Dec; 60(12):1810-8. PubMed ID: 26396261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Selection of response criteria affects the success rate of oral appliance treatment for obstructive sleep apnea. Fukuda T; Tsuiki S; Kobayashi M; Nakayama H; Inoue Y Sleep Med; 2014 Mar; 15(3):367-70. PubMed ID: 24560190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Oral appliances or maxillomandibular advancement osteotomy for severe obstructive sleep apnoea in patients refusing CPAP]. Jalbert F; Lacassagne L; Bessard J; Dekeister C; Paoli JR; Tiberge M Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2012 Feb; 113(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 22244739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficacy of an adjustable oral appliance and comparison with continuous positive airway pressure for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Holley AB; Lettieri CJ; Shah AA Chest; 2011 Dec; 140(6):1511-1516. PubMed ID: 21636666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimizing the mandibular advancement in an oral appliance for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. Anitua E; Durán-Cantolla J; Almeida GZ; Alkhraisat MH Sleep Med; 2017 Jun; 34():226-231. PubMed ID: 28228337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Non-CPAP therapies in obstructive sleep apnoea: mandibular advancement device therapy. Marklund M; Verbraecken J; Randerath W Eur Respir J; 2012 May; 39(5):1241-7. PubMed ID: 22075487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparing efficacy of the mandibular advancement device after drug-induced sleep endoscopy and continuous positive airway pressure in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Gogou ES; Psarras V; Giannakopoulos NN; Minaritzoglou A; Tsolakis IA; Margaritis V; Tzakis MG Sleep Breath; 2024 May; 28(2):773-788. PubMed ID: 38085497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing the Efficacy, Mask Leak, Patient Adherence, and Patient Preference of Three Different CPAP Interfaces to Treat Moderate-Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Rowland S; Aiyappan V; Hennessy C; Catcheside P; Chai-Coezter CL; McEvoy RD; Antic NA J Clin Sleep Med; 2018 Jan; 14(1):101-108. PubMed ID: 29198305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Effect of mandible advancement splints in mild, moderate, and severe obstructive sleep apnea-the need for sleep registrations during follow up. Palotie T; Riekki S; Mäkitie A; Bachour A; Arte S; Bäck L Eur J Orthod; 2017 Oct; 39(5):497-501. PubMed ID: 27999120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mandibular Advancement Device as a Comparable Treatment to Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Positional Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Takaesu Y; Tsuiki S; Kobayashi M; Komada Y; Nakayama H; Inoue Y J Clin Sleep Med; 2016 Aug; 12(8):1113-9. PubMed ID: 27250814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adherence to Continuous Positive Airway Pressure therapy in Singaporean patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Tan B; Tan A; Chan YH; Mok Y; Wong HS; Hsu PP Am J Otolaryngol; 2018; 39(5):501-506. PubMed ID: 29929863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of preoperative continuous positive airway pressure duration on outcomes after maxillofacial surgery for obstructive sleep apnoea. Islam S; Taylor C; Ormiston IW Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Feb; 53(2):183-6. PubMed ID: 25532967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical- and Cost-Effectiveness of a Mandibular Advancement Device Versus Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Moderate Obstructive Sleep Apnea. de Vries GE; Hoekema A; Vermeulen KM; Claessen JQPJ; Jacobs W; van der Maten J; van der Hoeven JH; Stegenga B; Kerstjens HAM; Wijkstra PJ J Clin Sleep Med; 2019 Oct; 15(10):1477-1485. PubMed ID: 31596213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]