These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26707969)

  • 1. Strategic Decisions in Task-Oriented Reading.
    Salmerón L; Vidal-Abarca E; Martínez T; Mañá A; Gil L; Naumann J
    Span J Psychol; 2015 Dec; 18():E102. PubMed ID: 26707969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Easy-to-read texts for students with intellectual disability: linguistic factors affecting comprehension.
    Fajardo I; Ávila V; Ferrer A; Tavares G; Gómez M; Hernández A
    J Appl Res Intellect Disabil; 2014 May; 27(3):212-25. PubMed ID: 23813583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of student performance while reading leveled books rated at their instructional level by a reading inventory.
    Burns MK; Pulles SM; Maki KE; Kanive R; Hodgson J; Helman LA; McComas JJ; Preast JL
    J Sch Psychol; 2015 Dec; 53(6):437-45. PubMed ID: 26563597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Capacity for self-monitoring reading comprehension in Elementary School.
    Bueno GJ; Carvalho CAF; Ávila CRB
    Codas; 2017 Jun; 29(3):e20160044. PubMed ID: 28614458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Questioning and reading goals: information-seeking questions asked on scientific texts read under different task conditions.
    Ishiwa K; Sanjosé V; Otero J
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2013 Sep; 83(Pt 3):502-20. PubMed ID: 23822534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Materials Matter: An Exploration of Text Complexity and Its Effects on Middle School Readers' Comprehension Processing.
    Dahl AC; Carlson SE; Renken M; McCarthy KS; Reynolds E
    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2021 Apr; 52(2):702-716. PubMed ID: 33784193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reading comprehension levels in scholars.
    Carvalho CA; Avila CR; Chiari BM
    Pro Fono; 2009; 21(3):207-12. PubMed ID: 19838566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Self-generated explanations on the question demands are not always helpful.
    Cerdán R; Gilabert R; Vidal-Abarca E
    Span J Psychol; 2013; 16():E26. PubMed ID: 23866220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adolescent reading skill and engagement with digital and traditional literacies as predictors of reading comprehension.
    Duncan LG; McGeown SP; Griffiths YM; Stothard SE; Dobai A
    Br J Psychol; 2016 May; 107(2):209-38. PubMed ID: 26094956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Construction and validation of an instrument to assess the reading comprehension of students from the third to the fifth grades of elementary school.
    Cunha VL; Capellini SA
    Codas; 2014; 26(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 24714856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using miscue analysis to assess comprehension in deaf college readers.
    Albertini J; Mayer C
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2011; 16(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 20488871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of reading performance in students from 3rd to 7th grade levels, with different text types.
    Dellisa PR; Navas AL
    Codas; 2013; 25(4):342-50. PubMed ID: 24408485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improving text comprehension: scaffolding adolescents into strategic reading.
    Ukrainetz TA
    Semin Speech Lang; 2015 Feb; 36(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 25633141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. QRAC-the-Code: a comprehension monitoring strategy for middle school social studies textbooks.
    Berkeley S; Riccomini PJ
    J Learn Disabil; 2013; 46(2):154-65. PubMed ID: 21757682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recording online processes in task-oriented reading with Read&Answer.
    Vidal-Abarca E; Martinez T; Salmerón L; Cerdán R; Gilabert R; Gil L; Mañá A; Llorens AC; Ferris R
    Behav Res Methods; 2011 Mar; 43(1):179-92. PubMed ID: 21287115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Skilled, the Knowledgeable, and the Motivated: Investigating the Strategic Allocation of Time on Task in a Computer-Based Assessment.
    Naumann J
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():1429. PubMed ID: 31379637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Developing and Validating a Scientific Multi-Text Reading Comprehension Assessment: In the Text Case of the Dispute of whether to Continue the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant Construction in Taiwan.
    Hsiao-Hui L; Tzeng YT
    J Appl Meas; 2018; 19(3):320-337. PubMed ID: 30169338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Examining reading comprehension text and question answering time differences in university students with and without a history of reading difficulties.
    Hebert M; Zhang X; Parrila R
    Ann Dyslexia; 2018 Apr; 68(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 29150819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accurate reading comprehension rate as an indicator of broad reading in students in first, second, and third grades.
    Ciancio D; Thompson K; Schall M; Skinner C; Foorman B
    J Sch Psychol; 2015 Oct; 53(5):393-407. PubMed ID: 26407836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing two modes of teaching a question-answering strategy for enhancing reading comprehension: didactic and self-instructional training.
    Graham L; Wong BY
    J Learn Disabil; 1993 Apr; 26(4):270-9. PubMed ID: 8515191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.