173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26708011)
1. How effective is postoperative packing in FESS patients? A critical analysis of published interventional studies.
Vlastarakos PV; Iacovou E; Fetta M; Tapis M; Nikolopoulos TP
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Dec; 273(12):4061-4071. PubMed ID: 26708011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Advances in Absorbable Biomaterials and Nasal Packing.
Massey CJ; Singh A
Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 2017 Jun; 50(3):545-563. PubMed ID: 28284452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of polyvinyl alcohol coated nasal packing with non-absorbable nasal packing.
Seol JH; Kim JM; Kim SS; Na BR; Jung H; Cho JH; Kim JK
Rhinology; 2013 Jun; 51(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 23671894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Absorbable and nonabsorbable packing after functional endoscopic sinus surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes.
Wang TC; Tai CJ; Tsou YA; Tsai LT; Li YF; Tsai MH
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Aug; 272(8):1825-31. PubMed ID: 24927828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Endoscopic outcomes of resorbable nasal packing after functional endoscopic sinus surgery: a multicenter prospective randomized controlled study.
Berlucchi M; Castelnuovo P; Vincenzi A; Morra B; Pasquini E
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Jun; 266(6):839-45. PubMed ID: 18946677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Effects of four different nasal packing materials after endoscopic sinus surgery].
Duan YQ; Chen GG; Li YL; Wang BQ
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 May; 30(9):750-753. PubMed ID: 29771030
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the effect of aerosolized fibrin sealant and biodegradable synthetic polyurethane foam on hemostasis and wound healing after endoscopic sinus surgery: a prospective randomized study.
Jung MS; Choi CH; Yu MS
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol; 2017 Nov; 7(11):1089-1094. PubMed ID: 28859245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The efficacy of Cutanplast nasal packing after endoscopic sinus surgery: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
Cho KS; Shin SK; Lee JH; Kim JY; Koo SK; Kim YW; Kim MJ; Roh HJ
Laryngoscope; 2013 Mar; 123(3):564-8. PubMed ID: 23086679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. CMC packing in functional endoscopic sinus surgery: does it affect patient comfort?
Leunig A; Betz CS; Siedek V; Kastl KG
Rhinology; 2009 Mar; 47(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 19382492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical outcome and patient satisfaction using biodegradable (NasoPore) and non-biodegradable packing, a double-blind, prospective, randomized study.
Burduk PK; Wierzchowska M; Grześkowiak B; Kaźmierczak W; Wawrzyniak K
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2017; 83(1):23-28. PubMed ID: 27068885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Middle meatal packing in endoscopic sinus surgery-to pack or not to pack?-a decision-analysis model.
Stern-Shavit S; Nachalon Y; Leshno M; Soudry E
Laryngoscope; 2017 Jul; 127(7):1506-1512. PubMed ID: 28449210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery improves sinus-related symptoms and quality of life in children with chronic rhinosinusitis: a systematic analysis and meta-analysis of published interventional studies.
Vlastarakos PV; Fetta M; Segas JV; Maragoudakis P; Nikolopoulos TP
Clin Pediatr (Phila); 2013 Dec; 52(12):1091-7. PubMed ID: 24146231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative analysis of Cutanplast and Spongostan nasal packing after endoscopic sinus surgery: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study.
Cho KS; Park CH; Hong SL; Kim MJ; Kim JY; Kim YW; Koo SK; Roh HJ
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Jul; 272(7):1699-705. PubMed ID: 25186452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Advances in absorbable biomaterials and nasal packing.
Valentine R; Wormald PJ; Sindwani R
Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 2009 Oct; 42(5):813-28, ix. PubMed ID: 19909861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Role of nasal packing in surgical outcome for chronic rhinosinusitis with polyposis.
Verim A; Seneldir L; Naiboğlu B; Karaca ÇT; Külekçi S; Toros SZ; Oysu Ç
Laryngoscope; 2014 Jul; 124(7):1529-35. PubMed ID: 24284971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effectiveness of Synthetic Polyurethane Foam as a Nasal Packing Material in Endoscopic Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy.
Lee J; Lee H; Lee HK; Chang M; Park M; Baek S
J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Oct; 26(7):2207-11. PubMed ID: 26468811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of pharyngeal packs in functional endoscopic sinus surgery: A randomized controlled trial.
Green R; Konuthula N; Sobrero M; Saini A; Parasher A; Pool C; Levine AI; DeMaria S; Tufts R; Govindaraj S; Iloreta AM
Laryngoscope; 2017 Nov; 127(11):2460-2465. PubMed ID: 28842996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Anti-adhesive effect of a thermosensitive poloxamer applied after the removal of nasal packing in endoscopic sinus surgery: a randomised multicentre clinical trial.
Song KJ; Lee HM; Lee EJ; Kwon JH; Jo KH; Kim KS
Clin Otolaryngol; 2013 Jun; 38(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 23745533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Electrocauterization and no packing may be comparable with nasal packing for postoperative hemorrhage after endoscopic sinus surgery.
Kim DK; Rhee CS; Kim JW
Am J Rhinol Allergy; 2016 May; 30(3):91-4. PubMed ID: 27216342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Absorbable Packing versus No Packing in Wound Healing after Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis.
Huang Z; Zhou B
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2021; 83(6):404-411. PubMed ID: 34412060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
