These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26708498)

  • 1. Action or attention in social inhibition of return?
    Doneva SP; Atkinson MA; Skarratt PA; Cole GG
    Psychol Res; 2017 Jan; 81(1):43-54. PubMed ID: 26708498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is social inhibition of return due to action co-representation?
    Atkinson MA; Simpson A; Skarratt PA; Cole GG
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jul; 150():85-93. PubMed ID: 24859672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of attention in a joint-action effect.
    Doneva SP; Cole GG
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(3):e91336. PubMed ID: 24642806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Response-specific effects in a joint action task: social inhibition of return effects do not emerge when observed and executed actions are different.
    Manzone J; Cole GG; Skarratt PA; Welsh TN
    Psychol Res; 2017 Sep; 81(5):1059-1071. PubMed ID: 27530404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sharing tasks or sharing actions? Evidence from the joint Simon task.
    Yamaguchi M; Wall HJ; Hommel B
    Psychol Res; 2018 Mar; 82(2):385-394. PubMed ID: 27826655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The joint flanker effect and the joint Simon effect: On the comparability of processes underlying joint compatibility effects.
    Dittrich K; Bossert ML; Rothe-Wulf A; Klauer KC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Sep; 70(9):1808-1823. PubMed ID: 27357224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Knowledge of response location alone is not sufficient to generate social inhibition of return.
    Welsh TN; Manzone J; McDougall L
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Nov; 153():153-9. PubMed ID: 25463556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attention allocation and task representation during joint action planning.
    Kourtis D; Knoblich G; Woźniak M; Sebanz N
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Oct; 26(10):2275-86. PubMed ID: 24702448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A role of goals for social inhibition of return?
    Janczyk M; Welsh TN; Dolk T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016 Dec; 69(12):2402-2418. PubMed ID: 26536175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Action-effect sharing induces task-set sharing in joint task switching.
    Yamaguchi M; Wall HJ; Hommel B
    Cognition; 2017 Aug; 165():113-120. PubMed ID: 28535468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attention allocation in complementary joint action: How joint goals affect spatial orienting.
    Schmitz L; Wahn B; Krüger M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 37684501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How social is social inhibition of return?
    Atkinson MA; Millett AC; Doneva SP; Simpson A; Cole GG
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Nov; 80(8):1892-1903. PubMed ID: 30014316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The relationship between attentional capture and deviations in movement trajectories in a selective reaching task.
    Welsh TN
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Jul; 137(3):300-8. PubMed ID: 21507363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of transients in action observation.
    Cole GG; Welsh TN; Skarratt PA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Oct; 81(7):2177-2191. PubMed ID: 31062298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inferring the size of a goal object from an actor's grasping movement in 6- and 9-month-old infants.
    Daum MM; Vuori MT; Prinz W; Aschersleben G
    Dev Sci; 2009 Nov; 12(6):854-62. PubMed ID: 19840041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The joint flanker effect: sharing tasks with real and imagined co-actors.
    Atmaca S; Sebanz N; Knoblich G
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Jun; 211(3-4):371-85. PubMed ID: 21573746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Humans are sensitive to attention control when predicting others' actions.
    Pesquita A; Chapman CS; Enns JT
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Aug; 113(31):8669-74. PubMed ID: 27436897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Learning of spatial configurations of a co-actor's attended objects in joint visual search.
    Sakata C; Ueda Y; Moriguchi Y
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 Apr; 215():103274. PubMed ID: 33631557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neural correlates of non-verbal social interactions: a dual-EEG study.
    Ménoret M; Varnet L; Fargier R; Cheylus A; Curie A; des Portes V; Nazir TA; Paulignan Y
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Mar; 55():85-97. PubMed ID: 24157538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The limits of attention for visual perception and action in aging.
    Lee TY; Hsieh S
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2009 May; 16(3):311-29. PubMed ID: 19301162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.