These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26708623)

  • 21. Individual differences in implicit motor learning: task specificity in sensorimotor adaptation and sequence learning.
    Stark-Inbar A; Raza M; Taylor JA; Ivry RB
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Jan; 117(1):412-428. PubMed ID: 27832611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The representation of conceptual knowledge: visual, auditory, and olfactory imagery compared with semantic processing.
    Palmiero M; Di Matteo R; Belardinelli MO
    Cogn Process; 2014 May; 15(2):143-57. PubMed ID: 24337415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Dual-mode presentation and its effect on implicit and explicit memory.
    David P; Hirshman E
    Am J Psychol; 1998; 111(1):77-87. PubMed ID: 9624704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The role of cross-modal associations in statistical learning.
    Glicksohn A; Cohen A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Dec; 20(6):1161-9. PubMed ID: 23716019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of model types in observational learning on implicit sequential learning.
    Tanaka K; Watanabe K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Jul; 71(7):1596-1606. PubMed ID: 28856961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Lack of Cross-Modal Effects in Dual-Modality Implicit Statistical Learning.
    Li X; Zhao X; Shi W; Lu Y; Conway CM
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():146. PubMed ID: 29535653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effects of association strength and cross-modal correspondence on the development of multimodal stimuli.
    Chan ZP; Dyson BJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Feb; 77(2):560-70. PubMed ID: 25391886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. When audition dominates vision: evidence from cross-modal statistical learning.
    Robinson CW; Sloutsky VM
    Exp Psychol; 2013; 60(2):113-21. PubMed ID: 23047918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Learning directions of objects specified by vision, spatial audition, or auditory spatial language.
    Klatzky RL; Lippa Y; Loomis JM; Golledge RG
    Learn Mem; 2002; 9(6):364-7. PubMed ID: 12464695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Category training induces cross-modal object representations in the adult human brain.
    van der Linden M; van Turennout M; Fernández G
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Jun; 23(6):1315-31. PubMed ID: 20521860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Conceptualization of task boundaries preserves implicit sequence learning under dual-task conditions.
    Halvorson KM; Wagschal TT; Hazeltine E
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Oct; 20(5):1005-10. PubMed ID: 23444106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sonification and haptic feedback in addition to visual feedback enhances complex motor task learning.
    Sigrist R; Rauter G; Marchal-Crespo L; Riener R; Wolf P
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Mar; 233(3):909-25. PubMed ID: 25511166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Interaction of sound and sight during action perception: evidence for shared modality-dependent action representations.
    Alaerts K; Swinnen SP; Wenderoth N
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Oct; 47(12):2593-9. PubMed ID: 19463837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Learning multisensory representations for auditory-visual transfer of sequence category knowledge: a probabilistic language of thought approach.
    Yildirim I; Jacobs RA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Jun; 22(3):673-86. PubMed ID: 25338656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effector-independent and effector-dependent sequence representations underlie general and specific perceptuomotor sequence learning.
    Andresen DR; Marsolek CJ
    J Mot Behav; 2012; 44(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 22242701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Implicit learning.
    Seger CA
    Psychol Bull; 1994 Mar; 115(2):163-96. PubMed ID: 8165269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Implicit learning of between-group intervals in auditory temporal structures.
    Terry J; Stevens CJ; Weidemann G; Tillmann B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Aug; 78(6):1728-43. PubMed ID: 27301354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Anticipation measures of sequence learning: manual versus oculomotor versions of the serial reaction time task.
    Vakil E; Bloch A; Cohen H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Mar; 70(3):579-589. PubMed ID: 27042771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Implicit visual learning: how the task set modulates learning by determining the stimulus-response binding.
    Haider H; Eberhardt K; Esser S; Rose M
    Conscious Cogn; 2014 May; 26():145-61. PubMed ID: 24747993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reverse hierarchies and sensory learning.
    Ahissar M; Nahum M; Nelken I; Hochstein S
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2009 Feb; 364(1515):285-99. PubMed ID: 18986968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.