275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26709105)
1. A randomized control trial comparing use of a novel electrocardiogram simulator with traditional teaching in the acquisition of electrocardiogram interpretation skill.
Fent G; Gosai J; Purva M
J Electrocardiol; 2016; 49(2):112-6. PubMed ID: 26709105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development and evaluation of methodologies for teaching focused cardiac ultrasound skills to medical students.
Cawthorn TR; Nickel C; O'Reilly M; Kafka H; Tam JW; Jackson LC; Sanfilippo AJ; Johri AM
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2014 Mar; 27(3):302-9. PubMed ID: 24433979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Teaching crucial skills: An electrocardiogram teaching module for medical students.
Chudgar SM; Engle DL; Grochowski CO; Gagliardi JP
J Electrocardiol; 2016; 49(4):490-5. PubMed ID: 27083329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A new algorithm for arrhythmia interpretation.
Mirtajaddini M
J Electrocardiol; 2017; 50(5):634-639. PubMed ID: 28552419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The acquisition and retention of ECG interpretation skills after a standardized web-based ECG tutorial-a randomised study.
Rolskov Bojsen S; Räder SB; Holst AG; Kayser L; Ringsted C; Hastrup Svendsen J; Konge L
BMC Med Educ; 2015 Mar; 15():36. PubMed ID: 25889642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is computer-assisted instruction more effective than other educational methods in achieving ECG competence among medical students and residents? Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Viljoen CA; Scott Millar R; Engel ME; Shelton M; Burch V
BMJ Open; 2017 Dec; 7(12):e018811. PubMed ID: 29282268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The evaluation of an open source online training system for teaching 12 lead electrocardiographic interpretation.
Breen C; Zhu T; Bond R; Finlay D; Clifford G
J Electrocardiol; 2016; 49(3):454-61. PubMed ID: 26925494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of two teaching methods for cardiac arrhythmia interpretation among nursing students.
Varvaroussis DP; Kalafati M; Pliatsika P; Castrén M; Lott C; Xanthos T
Resuscitation; 2014 Feb; 85(2):260-5. PubMed ID: 24128798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Teaching the interpretation of electrocardiograms: which method is best?
Fent G; Gosai J; Purva M
J Electrocardiol; 2015; 48(2):190-3. PubMed ID: 25573481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Electrocardiogram reading: a randomized study comparing 2 e‑learning methods for medical students.
Kopeć G; Waligóra M; Pacia M; Chmielak W; Stępień A; Janiec S; Magoń W; Jonas K; Podolec P
Pol Arch Intern Med; 2018 Feb; 128(2):98-104. PubMed ID: 29112943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Targeting clinical outcomes: Endovascular simulation improves diagnostic coronary angiography skills.
Schimmel DR; Sweis R; Cohen ER; Davidson C; Wayne DB
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Feb; 87(3):383-8. PubMed ID: 26198625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Education curriculum assessment for teaching electrocardiography: Rationale and design for the prospective, international, randomized controlled EDUCATE trial.
Kashou AH; Noseworthy PA; Beckman TJ; Anavekar NS; Cullen MW; Angstman KB; Sandefur BJ; Thompson CA; Halvorsen AJ; Shapiro BP; Wiley BW; Kates AM; Cosco D; Sadhu JS; Thakker PD; Huneycutt D; Braisted A; Smith SW; Baranchuk A; Grauer K; O'Brien K; Kaul V; Gambhir HS; Knohl SJ; Restrepo D; Kligfield PD; Macfarlane PW; Drew BJ; May AM
J Electrocardiol; 2023; 80():166-173. PubMed ID: 37467573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Electrocardiogram interpretation and arrhythmia management: a primary and secondary care survey.
Begg G; Willan K; Tyndall K; Pepper C; Tayebjee M
Br J Gen Pract; 2016 May; 66(646):e291-6. PubMed ID: 27025557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. E-learning and near-peer teaching in electrocardiogram education: a randomised trial.
Davies A; Macleod R; Bennett-Britton I; McElnay P; Bakhbakhi D; Sansom J
Clin Teach; 2016 Jun; 13(3):227-30. PubMed ID: 26135499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Methods of teaching and evaluating electrocardiogram interpretation skills among cardiology fellowship programs in the United States.
Auseon AJ; Schaal SF; Kolibash AJ; Nagel R; Lucey CR; Lewis RP
J Electrocardiol; 2009; 42(4):339-44. PubMed ID: 19268967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Techniques for teaching electrocardiogram interpretation: self-directed learning is less effective than a workshop or lecture.
Mahler SA; Wolcott CJ; Swoboda TK; Wang H; Arnold TC
Med Educ; 2011 Apr; 45(4):347-53. PubMed ID: 21401682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effectiveness of blended learning versus lectures alone on ECG analysis and interpretation by medical students.
Viljoen CA; Millar RS; Manning K; Burch VC
BMC Med Educ; 2020 Dec; 20(1):488. PubMed ID: 33272253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ultrasound simulator-assisted teaching of cardiac anatomy to preclinical anatomy students: A pilot randomized trial of a three-hour learning exposure.
Canty DJ; Hayes JA; Story DA; Royse CF
Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 24706544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Randomized Clinical Trial of Virtual Reality Simulation Training for Transvaginal Gynecologic Ultrasound Skills.
Chao C; Chalouhi GE; Bouhanna P; Ville Y; Dommergues M
J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Sep; 34(9):1663-7. PubMed ID: 26283753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Teaching electrocardiogram interpretation.
Childers R
J Electrocardiol; 2006 Oct; 39(4):426-9. PubMed ID: 16895774
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
