These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26709403)

  • 1. Interviews: Big ideas for better science.
    Powell K
    Nature; 2015 Dec; 528(7583):589-90. PubMed ID: 26709403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gender bias goes away when grant reviewers focus on the science.
    Guglielmi G
    Nature; 2018 Feb; 554(7690):14-15. PubMed ID: 29388971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Science and sexism: In the eye of the Twitterstorm.
    Morello L
    Nature; 2015 Nov; 527(7577):148-51. PubMed ID: 26560281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Go beyond bias training.
    Mendoza-Denton R; Patt C; Richards M
    Nature; 2018 May; 557(7705):299-301. PubMed ID: 29769689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peer review: Close inspection.
    Schiermeier Q
    Nature; 2016 May; 533(7602):279-81. PubMed ID: 27200447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. NASA changes how it divvies up telescope time to reduce gender bias.
    Witze A
    Nature; 2019 Jul; 571(7764):156. PubMed ID: 31289388
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sexism has no place in science.
    Nature; 2015 Jun; 522(7556):255. PubMed ID: 26085233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rookie review.
    Gewin V
    Nature; 2011 Oct; 478(7368):275-7. PubMed ID: 21998887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speak up about subtle sexism in science.
    Serio T
    Nature; 2016 Apr; 532(7600):415. PubMed ID: 27121804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Build an internet for, and from, us all.
    Sengupta A; Bouterse S; Allmann K
    Nature; 2018 Nov; 563(7733):S147-S148. PubMed ID: 30487625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A toolkit for data transparency takes shape.
    Perkel JM
    Nature; 2018 Aug; 560(7719):513-515. PubMed ID: 30127481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Race- and gender-based bias persists in US science.
    Nature; 2018 Feb; 554(7693):561. PubMed ID: 29469104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Science and gender: Scientists must work harder on equality.
    Urry M
    Nature; 2015 Dec; 528(7583):471-3. PubMed ID: 26701038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Peer review, science, young investigators feelings and frustrations.
    Evora PR; Celotto AC
    Acta Cir Bras; 2011 Feb; 26(1):77-8. PubMed ID: 21271208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Peer reviewers need more nurturing.
    Catlow R
    Nature; 2017 Dec; 552(7685):293. PubMed ID: 29293240
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sex as a Biological Variable: Now What?!
    Miller VM; Reckelhoff JF
    Physiology (Bethesda); 2016 Mar; 31(2):78-80. PubMed ID: 26865575
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Checklists work to improve science.
    Nature; 2018 Apr; 556(7701):273-274. PubMed ID: 30967653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Peer reviews: in praise of referees.
    Altschuler EL
    Nature; 2011 May; 473(7348):452. PubMed ID: 21614062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Women from some under-represented minorities are given too few talks at world's largest Earth-science conference.
    Ford HL; Brick C; Azmitia M; Blaufuss K; Dekens P
    Nature; 2019 Dec; 576(7785):32-35. PubMed ID: 31797914
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reviewing peer review: the three reviewers you meet at submission time.
    Clarke SP
    Can J Nurs Res; 2006 Dec; 38(4):5-9. PubMed ID: 17342873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.