These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

326 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26709693)

  • 1. Visual-somatotopic interactions in spatial perception.
    Samad M; Shams L
    Neuroreport; 2016 Feb; 27(3):180-5. PubMed ID: 26709693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Extending visual dominance over touch for input off the body.
    Hartcher-O'Brien J; Levitan C; Spence C
    Brain Res; 2010 Nov; 1362():48-55. PubMed ID: 20850418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bayesian inference explains perception of unity and ventriloquism aftereffect: identification of common sources of audiovisual stimuli.
    Sato Y; Toyoizumi T; Aihara K
    Neural Comput; 2007 Dec; 19(12):3335-55. PubMed ID: 17970656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Audiotactile integration is reduced in congenital blindness in a spatial ventriloquism task.
    Occelli V; Bruns P; Zampini M; Röder B
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jan; 50(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 22051726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spatial remapping in the audio-tactile ventriloquism effect: a TMS investigation on the role of the ventral intraparietal area.
    Renzi C; Bruns P; Heise KF; Zimerman M; Feldheim JF; Hummel FC; Röder B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2013 May; 25(5):790-801. PubMed ID: 23363411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recalibrating the body: visuotactile ventriloquism aftereffect.
    Samad M; Shams L
    PeerJ; 2018; 6():e4504. PubMed ID: 29576972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tactile capture of auditory localization is modulated by hand posture.
    Bruns P; Röder B
    Exp Psychol; 2010; 57(4):267-74. PubMed ID: 20178933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tactile recalibration of auditory spatial representations.
    Bruns P; Spence C; Röder B
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Mar; 209(3):333-44. PubMed ID: 21279335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interactions between apparent motion rivalry in vision and touch.
    Conrad V; Vitello MP; Noppeney U
    Psychol Sci; 2012 Aug; 23(8):940-8. PubMed ID: 22810167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Audio-visual synchrony modulates the ventriloquist illusion and its neural/spatial representation in the auditory cortex.
    Bonath B; Noesselt T; Krauel K; Tyll S; Tempelmann C; Hillyard SA
    Neuroimage; 2014 Sep; 98():425-34. PubMed ID: 24814210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimal Audiovisual Integration in the Ventriloquism Effect But Pervasive Deficits in Unisensory Spatial Localization in Amblyopia.
    Richards MD; Goltz HC; Wong AMF
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2018 Jan; 59(1):122-131. PubMed ID: 29332124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The representation of space near the body through touch and vision.
    Macaluso E; Maravita A
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Feb; 48(3):782-95. PubMed ID: 19837101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reward expectation influences audiovisual spatial integration.
    Bruns P; Maiworm M; Röder B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Aug; 76(6):1815-27. PubMed ID: 24874263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Seeing the body distorts tactile size perception.
    Longo MR; Sadibolova R
    Cognition; 2013 Mar; 126(3):475-81. PubMed ID: 23313871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Seeing and feeling for self and other: proprioceptive spatial location determines multisensory enhancement of touch.
    Cardini F; Haggard P; Ladavas E
    Cognition; 2013 Apr; 127(1):84-92. PubMed ID: 23376293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evidence for crossmodal interactions across depth on target localisation performance in a spatial array.
    Chan JS; Maguinness C; Lisiecka D; Setti A; Newell FN
    Perception; 2012; 41(7):757-73. PubMed ID: 23155729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. When far is near: ERP correlates of crossmodal spatial interactions between tactile and mirror-reflected visual stimuli.
    Sambo CF; Forster B
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 Aug; 500(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 21683122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spatial limits of visuotactile interactions in the presence and absence of tactile stimulation.
    Mirams L; Poliakoff E; Lloyd DM
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Sep; 235(9):2591-2600. PubMed ID: 28560494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Crossmodal associations modulate multisensory spatial integration.
    Tong J; Li L; Bruns P; Röder B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Oct; 82(7):3490-3506. PubMed ID: 32627131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Representational momentum in vision and touch: Visual motion information biases tactile spatial localization.
    Merz S; Meyerhoff HS; Frings C; Spence C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2618-2629. PubMed ID: 32140935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.