245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2671005)
21. Electrophoretic karyotype of Aspergillus nidulans.
Brody H; Carbon J
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1989 Aug; 86(16):6260-3. PubMed ID: 2668960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Pulsed field electrophoresis in contour-clamped homogeneous electric fields for the resolution of DNA by size or topology.
Chu G
Electrophoresis; 1989; 10(5-6):290-5. PubMed ID: 2670544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Separation of chromosomes of Cryptococcus neoformans by pulsed field gel electrophoresis.
Perfect JR; Magee BB; Magee PT
Infect Immun; 1989 Sep; 57(9):2624-7. PubMed ID: 2668180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Pulsed field gel electrophoresis: studies of DNA migration made with the programmable, autonomously-controlled electrode electrophoresis system.
Birren BW; Hood L; Lai E
Electrophoresis; 1989; 10(5-6):302-9. PubMed ID: 2527739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Analysis of the inversion effect in pulsed field gel electrophoresis by a two-dimensional contour-clamped homogeneous electric field system.
Löbrich M; Ikpeme S; Kiefer J
Anal Biochem; 1993 Jan; 208(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 8434797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A systematic study of field inversion gel electrophoresis.
Heller C; Pohl FM
Nucleic Acids Res; 1989 Aug; 17(15):5989-6003. PubMed ID: 2528121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Field alternation gel electrophoresis--status quo.
Townsend KM; Dawkins HJ
J Chromatogr; 1993 Aug; 618(1-2):223-49. PubMed ID: 8227258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.
Herschleb J; Ananiev G; Schwartz DC
Nat Protoc; 2007; 2(3):677-84. PubMed ID: 17406630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Techniques and high resolution DNA size markers for pulsed field gel electrophoresis.
Cooney CA
Mol Biotechnol; 1994 Oct; 2(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 7866871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Separation of large DNA molecules by modified pulsed field gradient gel electrophoresis.
McPeek FD; Coyle-Morris JF; Gemmill RM
Anal Biochem; 1986 Aug; 156(2):274-85. PubMed ID: 3532861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Resolving power: a quantitative measure of electrophoretic resolution.
Ribeiro EA; Sutherland JC
Anal Biochem; 1993 May; 210(2):378-88. PubMed ID: 8512074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Pulsed-field polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis: basic phenomena and applications.
Ito T; Hohjoh H; Sakaki Y
Electrophoresis; 1993 Apr; 14(4):278-82. PubMed ID: 8500458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Agarose gel electrophoresis for the separation of DNA fragments.
Lee PY; Costumbrado J; Hsu CY; Kim YH
J Vis Exp; 2012 Apr; (62):. PubMed ID: 22546956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Transverse alternating field electrophoresis (TAFE).
Stewart G; Furst A; Avdalovic N
Biotechniques; 1988 Jan; 6(1):68-73. PubMed ID: 3273395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A model for the separation of large DNA molecules by crossed field gel electrophoresis.
Southern EM; Anand R; Brown WR; Fletcher DS
Nucleic Acids Res; 1987 Aug; 15(15):5925-43. PubMed ID: 3627974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of the separation of Candida albicans chromosome-sized DNA by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis techniques.
Lasker BA; Carle GF; Kobayashi GS; Medoff G
Nucleic Acids Res; 1989 May; 17(10):3783-93. PubMed ID: 2660101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Generalized tube model of biased reptation for gel electrophoresis of DNA.
Noolandi J; Slater GW; Lim HA; Viovy JL
Science; 1989 Mar; 243(4897):1456-8. PubMed ID: 2928779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Separation of large DNA by a variable-angle contour-clamped homogeneous electric field apparatus.
Chu G; Gunderson K
Anal Biochem; 1991 May; 194(2):439-46. PubMed ID: 1862945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Electrophoresis of DNA in oriented agarose gels.
Holmes DL; Stellwagen NC
J Biomol Struct Dyn; 1989 Oct; 7(2):311-27. PubMed ID: 2604908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. High-resolution separation and accurate size determination in pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of DNA. 2. Effect of pulse time and electric field strength and implications for models of the separation process.
Mathew MK; Smith CL; Cantor CR
Biochemistry; 1988 Dec; 27(26):9210-6. PubMed ID: 3242624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
