168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2671035)
1. Cytobrush in collection of cervical specimens for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.
Moncada J; Schachter J; Shipp M; Bolan G; Wilber J
J Clin Microbiol; 1989 Aug; 27(8):1863-6. PubMed ID: 2671035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnosis by AMPLICOR PCR of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in urine samples from women and men attending sexually transmitted disease clinics.
Quinn TC; Welsh L; Lentz A; Crotchfelt K; Zenilman J; Newhall J; Gaydos C
J Clin Microbiol; 1996 Jun; 34(6):1401-6. PubMed ID: 8735088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in first-void urine collected from men and women attending a venereal clinic.
Genç M; Stary A; Bergman S; Mårdh PA
APMIS; 1991 May; 99(5):455-9. PubMed ID: 2043357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the Kallested Pathfinder EIA, cytocentrifuged direct fluorescent antibody, and cell culture for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.
LeBar W; Schubiner H; Jemal C; Herschman B; Criswell K; Curtin N; Sherbeck M
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1991; 14(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 2013206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detecting Chlamydia trachomatis by direct immunofluorescence using a Cytobrush sampling technique.
Ciotti RA; Sondheimer SJ; Nachamkin I
Genitourin Med; 1988 Aug; 64(4):245-6. PubMed ID: 3049302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of PCR and direct immunofluorescence microscopy for confirmation of results obtained by Syva MicroTrak Chlamydia enzyme immunoassay.
Ostergaard L; Møller JK
J Clin Microbiol; 1995 Oct; 33(10):2620-3. PubMed ID: 8567894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of endocervical specimen adequacy on PCR and direct fluorescent-antibody staining for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infections.
Welsh LE; Quinn TC; Gaydos CA
J Clin Microbiol; 1997 Dec; 35(12):3078-81. PubMed ID: 9399497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficacy of duplicate genital specimens and repeated testing for confirming positive results for chlamydiazyme detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigen.
Kellogg JA; Seiple JW; Levisky JS
J Clin Microbiol; 1989 Jun; 27(6):1218-21. PubMed ID: 2753999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in a sexually transmitted disease clinic: evaluation of a urine sample tested by enzyme immunoassay and polymerase chain reaction in comparison with a cervical and/or a urethral swab tested by culture and polymerase chain reaction.
Jensen IP; Fogh H; Prag J
Clin Microbiol Infect; 2003 Mar; 9(3):194-201. PubMed ID: 12667251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of polymerase chain reaction, monoclonal antibody based enzyme immunoassay, and cell culture for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital specimens.
Wu CH; Lee MF; Yin SC; Yang DM; Cheng SF
Sex Transm Dis; 1992; 19(4):193-7. PubMed ID: 1411833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Altering TestPack Chlamydia sampling swab decreases testing time.
Coleman P
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1991; 14(2):171-2. PubMed ID: 1831415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Chlamydia trachomatis in women: the more you look, the more you find.
Hay PE; Thomas BJ; Horner PJ; MacLeod E; Renton AM; Taylor-Robinson D
Genitourin Med; 1994 Apr; 70(2):97-100. PubMed ID: 8206484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the effectiveness of polymerase chain reaction and enzyme immunoassay in detecting Chlamydia trachomatis in different female genitourinary specimens.
Chan EL; Brandt K; Stoneham H; Antonishyn N; Horsman GB
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2000 Jun; 124(6):840-3. PubMed ID: 10835517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women attending urban midwestern family planning and community health clinics: risk factors, selective screening, and evaluation of non-culture techniques.
Addiss DG; Vaughn ML; Golubjatnikov R; Pfister J; Kurtycz DF; Davis JP
Sex Transm Dis; 1990; 17(3):138-46. PubMed ID: 2247804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance of the Gen-Probe AMPLIFIED Chlamydia Trachomatis Assay in detecting Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical and urine specimens from women and urethral and urine specimens from men attending sexually transmitted disease and family planning clinics.
Ferrero DV; Meyers HN; Schultz DE; Willis SA
J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Nov; 36(11):3230-3. PubMed ID: 9774570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison between the LCx Probe system and the COBAS AMPLICOR system for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections in patients attending a clinic for treatment of sexually transmitted diseases in Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
van Doornum GJ; Schouls LM; Pijl A; Cairo I; Buimer M; Bruisten S
J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Mar; 39(3):829-35. PubMed ID: 11230391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of a polymer conjugate-enhanced enzyme immunoassay to ligase chain reaction for diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical swabs.
Chernesky M; Jang D; Copes D; Patel J; Petrich A; Biers K; Sproston A; Kapala J
J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Jun; 39(6):2306-7. PubMed ID: 11376077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of three techniques for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens from asymptomatic women.
Lefebvre J; Laperrière H; Rousseau H; Massé R
J Clin Microbiol; 1988 Apr; 26(4):726-31. PubMed ID: 3284899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the Biostar Chlamydia OIA assay with specimens from women attending a sexually transmitted disease clinic.
Pate MS; Dixon PB; Hardy K; Crosby M; Hook EW
J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Aug; 36(8):2183-6. PubMed ID: 9665987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of polymerase chain reaction on pooled cervical swabs to detect Chlamydia trachomatis infections in female sex workers in Singapore.
Tan HH; Chan R
Singapore Med J; 2005 May; 46(5):215-8. PubMed ID: 15858689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
