207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26711471)
1. TAXONOMY OF MEDICAL DEVICES IN THE LOGIC OF HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT.
Henschke C; Panteli D; Perleth M; Busse R
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2015 Jan; 31(5):324-30. PubMed ID: 26711471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Health technology assessment of medical devices: What is different? An overview of three European projects.
Schnell-Inderst P; Mayer J; Lauterberg J; Hunger T; Arvandi M; Conrads-Frank A; Nachtnebel A; Wild C; Siebert U
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2015; 109(4-5):309-18. PubMed ID: 26354131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Testing a new taxonomic model for the assessment of medical devices: Is it plausible and applicable? Insights from HTA reports and interviews with HTA institutions in Europe.
Fuchs S; Olberg B; Perleth M; Busse R; Panteli D
Health Policy; 2019 Feb; 123(2):173-181. PubMed ID: 29703653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Health technology assessment for medical devices in Europe. What must be considered.
Siebert M; Clauss LC; Carlisle M; Casteels B; de Jong P; Kreuzer M; Sanghera S; Stokoe G; Trueman P; Lang AW;
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2002; 18(3):733-40. PubMed ID: 12391964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Health technology assessment of medical devices: a survey of non-European union agencies.
Ciani O; Wilcher B; Blankart CR; Hatz M; Rupel VP; Erker RS; Varabyova Y; Taylor RS
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2015 Jan; 31(3):154-65. PubMed ID: 26044729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A
Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Linking the Regulatory and Reimbursement Processes for Medical Devices: The Need for Integrated Assessments.
Ciani O; Wilcher B; van Giessen A; Taylor RS
Health Econ; 2017 Feb; 26 Suppl 1():13-29. PubMed ID: 28139087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Challenges in the Assessment of Medical Devices: The MedtecHTA Project.
Tarricone R; Torbica A; Drummond M
Health Econ; 2017 Feb; 26 Suppl 1():5-12. PubMed ID: 28139084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical studies of innovative medical devices: what level of evidence for hospital-based health technology assessment?
Boudard A; Martelli N; Prognon P; Pineau J
J Eval Clin Pract; 2013 Aug; 19(4):697-702. PubMed ID: 23510375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT METHODS GUIDELINES FOR MEDICAL DEVICES: HOW CAN WE ADDRESS THE GAPS? THE INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF MEDICAL AND BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING PERSPECTIVE.
Polisena J; Castaldo R; Ciani O; Federici C; Borsci S; Ritrovato M; Clark D; Pecchia L
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2018 Jan; 34(3):276-289. PubMed ID: 29909792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Combining multi-criteria decision analysis and mini-health technology assessment: A funding decision-support tool for medical devices in a university hospital setting.
Martelli N; Hansen P; van den Brink H; Boudard A; Cordonnier AL; Devaux C; Pineau J; Prognon P; Borget I
J Biomed Inform; 2016 Feb; 59():201-8. PubMed ID: 26705065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. HTA of medical devices: Challenges and ideas for the future from a European perspective.
Fuchs S; Olberg B; Panteli D; Perleth M; Busse R
Health Policy; 2017 Mar; 121(3):215-229. PubMed ID: 27751533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Adoption Decisions for Medical Devices in the Field of Cardiology: Results from a European Survey.
Hatz MH; Schreyögg J; Torbica A; Boriani G; Blankart CR
Health Econ; 2017 Feb; 26 Suppl 1():124-144. PubMed ID: 28139093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. MEDICAL DEVICE PRICES IN ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS.
Akpinar I; Jacobs P; Husereau D
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2015 Jan; 31(1-2):86-9. PubMed ID: 25989920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Key Recommendations from the MedtecHTA Project.
Tarricone R; Torbica A; Drummond M;
Health Econ; 2017 Feb; 26 Suppl 1():145-152. PubMed ID: 28139086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hospital-based health technology assessment in France: A focus on medical devices.
Martelli N; Puc C; Szwarcensztein K; ; Beuscart R; Coulonjou H; Degrassat-Théas A; Dutot C; Epis de Fleurian AA; Favrel-Feuillade F; Hounliasso I; Lechat P; Luigi E; Mairot L; Nguyen T; Piazza L; Roussel C; Vienney C
Therapie; 2017 Feb; 72(1):115-123. PubMed ID: 28189333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Decision-analytic modeling for early health technology assessment of medical devices - a scoping review.
Conrads-Frank A; Schnell-Inderst P; Neusser S; Hallsson LR; Stojkov I; Siebert S; Kühne F; Jahn B; Siebert U; Sroczynski G
Ger Med Sci; 2022; 20():Doc11. PubMed ID: 36742459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Organisational impact: Definition and assessment methods for medical devices.
Roussel C; Carbonneil C; Audry A;
Therapie; 2016 Feb; 71(1):69-96. PubMed ID: 27080633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The economic evaluation of medical devices: challenges.
Kingkaew P; Teerawattananon Y
J Med Assoc Thai; 2014 May; 97 Suppl 5():S102-7. PubMed ID: 24964706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Suitability of the Current Health Technology Assessment of Innovative Artificial Intelligence-Based Medical Devices: Scoping Literature Review.
Farah L; Borget I; Martelli N; Vallee A
J Med Internet Res; 2024 May; 26():e51514. PubMed ID: 38739911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
