These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26711471)

  • 21. INTRODUCTION OF INNOVATIVE MEDICAL DEVICES AT FRENCH UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS: AN OVERVIEW OF HOSPITAL-BASED HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT INITIATIVES.
    Martelli N; Billaux M; Borget I; Pineau J; Prognon P; van den Brink H
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2015 Jan; 31(1-2):12-8. PubMed ID: 25991072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Classification of active medical devices according to the Medical Device Directive.
    Bünger M; Tümmler HP
    Med Device Technol; 1994 Mar; 5(2):33-9. PubMed ID: 10184169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Health Technology Assessment: managing the introduction and use of medical devices in clinical practice in Italy.
    Migliore A; Ratti M; Cerbo M; Jefferson T
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2009 May; 6(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 19419283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Special funding schemes for innovative medical devices in French hospitals: the pros and cons of two different approaches.
    Martelli N; van den Brink H
    Health Policy; 2014 Jul; 117(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 24794738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A review of the economic tools for assessing new medical devices.
    Craig JA; Carr L; Hutton J; Glanville J; Iglesias CP; Sims AJ
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2015 Feb; 13(1):15-27. PubMed ID: 25139635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Towards a taxonomy of logic models in systematic reviews and health technology assessments: A priori, staged, and iterative approaches.
    Rehfuess EA; Booth A; Brereton L; Burns J; Gerhardus A; Mozygemba K; Oortwijn W; Pfadenhauer LM; Tummers M; van der Wilt GJ; Rohwer A
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Mar; 9(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 28677339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Generating appropriate clinical data for value assessment of medical devices: what role does regulation play?
    Tarricone R; Torbica A; Ferré F; Drummond M
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2014 Oct; 14(5):707-18. PubMed ID: 25196848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Development and evaluation of a new taxonomy of mobility-related assistive technology devices.
    Shoemaker LL; Lenker JA; Fuhrer MJ; Jutai JW; Demers L; DeRuyter F
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2010 Oct; 89(10):795-808. PubMed ID: 20855980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Adapting health technology assessment for drugs, medical devices, and health programs: Methodological considerations from the Indian experience.
    Prinja S; Jyani G; Gupta N; Rajsekar K
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2021 Oct; 21(5):859-868. PubMed ID: 33882762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Scientific Evidence in Health Technology Assessment Reports: An In-Depth Analysis of European Assessments on High-Risk Medical Devices.
    Olberg B; Fuchs S; Panteli D; Perleth M; Busse R
    Value Health; 2017 Dec; 20(10):1420-1426. PubMed ID: 29241902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Factors influencing coverage decisions on medical devices: A retrospective analysis of 78 medical device appraisals for the Austrian hospital benefit catalogue 2008-2015.
    Kisser A; Tüchler H; Erdös J; Wild C
    Health Policy; 2016 Aug; 120(8):903-12. PubMed ID: 27344197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The limited state of technology assessment for medical devices: facing the issues.
    Ramsey SD; Luce BR; Deyo R; Franklin G
    Am J Manag Care; 1998 Sep; 4 Spec No():SP188-99. PubMed ID: 10185994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Different regulatory framework for medical devices and drugs in the European Union: Impact on clinical research and health technology assessments.
    Albuquerque de Almeida F; Ricardo M
    Int J Health Plann Manage; 2023 Sep; 38(5):1420-1434. PubMed ID: 37316973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Role of technology assessment in health benefits coverage for medical devices.
    Braslow NM; Shatin D; McCarthy DB; Newcomer LN
    Am J Manag Care; 1998 Sep; 4 Spec No():SP139-50. PubMed ID: 10185990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessing medical devices: a qualitative study from the validate perspective.
    Bloemen B; Oortwijn W
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2024 Apr; 40(1):e29. PubMed ID: 38654522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Expanding Health Technology Assessments to Include Effects on the Environment.
    Marsh K; Ganz ML; Hsu J; Strandberg-Larsen M; Gonzalez RP; Lund N
    Value Health; 2016; 19(2):249-54. PubMed ID: 27021760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Hospital-based health technology assessment in France: how to proceed to evaluate innovative medical devices?].
    Martelli N; van den Brink H; Denies F; Dervaux B; Germe AF; Prognon P; Pineau J
    Ann Pharm Fr; 2014 Jan; 72(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 24438663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Technology assessment of medical devices at the Center for Devices and Radiological Health.
    Kessler L; Richter K
    Am J Manag Care; 1998 Sep; 4 Spec No():SP129-35. PubMed ID: 10185989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Medical devices are different to pharmaceuticals in the Health Technology Assessment process.
    Ferguson M
    J Comp Eff Res; 2014 May; 3(3):217-9. PubMed ID: 24969145
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Assessment of medical devices: how to conduct comparative technology evaluations of product performance.
    Burns LR; Bradlow ET; Lee JA; Antonacci AC
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2007; 23(4):455-63. PubMed ID: 17937834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.