These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26711815)

  • 1. Updating the reference population to achieve constant genomic prediction reliability across generations.
    Pszczola M; Calus MP
    Animal; 2016 Jun; 10(6):1018-24. PubMed ID: 26711815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability of direct genomic values for animals with different relationships within and to the reference population.
    Pszczola M; Strabel T; Mulder HA; Calus MP
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Jan; 95(1):389-400. PubMed ID: 22192218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Including overseas performance information in genomic evaluations of Australian dairy cattle.
    Haile-Mariam M; Pryce JE; Schrooten C; Hayes BJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 May; 98(5):3443-59. PubMed ID: 25771052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genomic selection in dairy cattle simulated populations.
    Seno LO; Guidolin DGF; Aspilcueta-Borquis RR; Nascimento GBD; Silva TBRD; Oliveira HN; Munari DP
    J Dairy Res; 2018 May; 85(2):125-132. PubMed ID: 29785919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predicted accuracy of and response to genomic selection for new traits in dairy cattle.
    Calus MP; de Haas Y; Pszczola M; Veerkamp RF
    Animal; 2013 Feb; 7(2):183-91. PubMed ID: 23031684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adding cows to the reference population makes a small dairy population competitive.
    Thomasen JR; Sørensen AC; Lund MS; Guldbrandtsen B
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Sep; 97(9):5822-32. PubMed ID: 24996280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The value of cows in reference populations for genomic selection of new functional traits.
    Buch LH; Kargo M; Berg P; Lassen J; Sørensen AC
    Animal; 2012 Jun; 6(6):880-6. PubMed ID: 22558957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges.
    Hayes BJ; Bowman PJ; Chamberlain AJ; Goddard ME
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Feb; 92(2):433-43. PubMed ID: 19164653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genomic selection strategies in a small dairy cattle population evaluated for genetic gain and profit.
    Thomasen JR; Egger-Danner C; Willam A; Guldbrandtsen B; Lund MS; Sørensen AC
    J Dairy Sci; 2014; 97(1):458-70. PubMed ID: 24239076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of model specifications on the reliabilities of genomic prediction in a Swedish-Finnish red breed cattle population.
    Rius-Vilarrasa E; Brøndum RF; Strandén I; Guldbrandtsen B; Strandberg E; Lund MS; Fikse WF
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2012 Oct; 129(5):369-79. PubMed ID: 22963358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Including different groups of genotyped females for genomic prediction in a Nordic Jersey population.
    Gao H; Madsen P; Nielsen US; Aamand GP; Su G; Byskov K; Jensen J
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Dec; 98(12):9051-9. PubMed ID: 26433419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sharing reference data and including cows in the reference population improve genomic predictions in Danish Jersey.
    Su G; Ma P; Nielsen US; Aamand GP; Wiggans G; Guldbrandtsen B; Lund MS
    Animal; 2016 Jun; 10(6):1067-75. PubMed ID: 26330119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Review: Opportunities and challenges for small populations of dairy cattle in the era of genomics.
    Schöpke K; Swalve HH
    Animal; 2016 Jun; 10(6):1050-60. PubMed ID: 26957010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of number of training generations on genomic prediction for various traits in a layer chicken population.
    Weng Z; Wolc A; Shen X; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC; Arango J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Mar; 48():22. PubMed ID: 26992471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Which Individuals To Choose To Update the Reference Population? Minimizing the Loss of Genetic Diversity in Animal Genomic Selection Programs.
    Eynard SE; Croiseau P; Laloë D; Fritz S; Calus MPL; Restoux G
    G3 (Bethesda); 2018 Jan; 8(1):113-121. PubMed ID: 29133511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multi-generational imputation of single nucleotide polymorphism marker genotypes and accuracy of genomic selection.
    Toghiani S; Aggrey SE; Rekaya R
    Animal; 2016 Jul; 10(7):1077-85. PubMed ID: 27076192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of imputing markers from a low-density chip on the reliability of genomic breeding values in Holstein populations.
    Dassonneville R; Brøndum RF; Druet T; Fritz S; Guillaume F; Guldbrandtsen B; Lund MS; Ducrocq V; Su G
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Jul; 94(7):3679-86. PubMed ID: 21700057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using genomics to enhance selection of novel traits in North American dairy cattle.
    Chesnais JP; Cooper TA; Wiggans GR; Sargolzaei M; Pryce JE; Miglior F
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Mar; 99(3):2413-2427. PubMed ID: 26778318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliabilities of genomic prediction using combined reference data of the Nordic Red dairy cattle populations.
    Brøndum RF; Rius-Vilarrasa E; Strandén I; Su G; Guldbrandtsen B; Fikse WF; Lund MS
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Sep; 94(9):4700-7. PubMed ID: 21854944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Imputation of genotypes with low-density chips and its effect on reliability of direct genomic values in Dutch Holstein cattle.
    Mulder HA; Calus MP; Druet T; Schrooten C
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Feb; 95(2):876-89. PubMed ID: 22281352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.