These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26711815)

  • 21. Comparison of Bayesian models to estimate direct genomic values in multi-breed commercial beef cattle.
    Rolf MM; Garrick DJ; Fountain T; Ramey HR; Weaber RL; Decker JE; Pollak EJ; Schnabel RD; Taylor JF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Apr; 47(1):23. PubMed ID: 25884158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of genotyped cows in the reference population on the genomic evaluation of Holstein cattle.
    Uemoto Y; Osawa T; Saburi J
    Animal; 2017 Mar; 11(3):382-393. PubMed ID: 27515004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Short communication: Genotyping of cows to speed up availability of genomic estimated breeding values for direct health traits in Austrian Fleckvieh (Simmental) cattle--genetic and economic aspects.
    Egger-Danner C; Schwarzenbacher H; Willam A
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Jul; 97(7):4552-6. PubMed ID: 24835973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Model comparison on genomic predictions using high-density markers for different groups of bulls in the Nordic Holstein population.
    Gao H; Su G; Janss L; Zhang Y; Lund MS
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Jul; 96(7):4678-87. PubMed ID: 23660137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Improved precision of QTL mapping using a nonlinear Bayesian method in a multi-breed population leads to greater accuracy of across-breed genomic predictions.
    Kemper KE; Reich CM; Bowman PJ; Vander Jagt CJ; Chamberlain AJ; Mason BA; Hayes BJ; Goddard ME
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Apr; 47(1):29. PubMed ID: 25887988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Accounting for trait architecture in genomic predictions of US Holstein cattle using a weighted realized relationship matrix.
    Tiezzi F; Maltecca C
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Apr; 47(1):24. PubMed ID: 25886167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of genomic predictions using medium-density (∼54,000) and high-density (∼777,000) single nucleotide polymorphism marker panels in Nordic Holstein and Red Dairy Cattle populations.
    Su G; Brøndum RF; Ma P; Guldbrandtsen B; Aamand GP; Lund MS
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Aug; 95(8):4657-65. PubMed ID: 22818480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Short communication: The effect of genotyping cows to improve the reliability of genomic predictions for selection candidates.
    Edel C; Pimentel ECG; Plieschke L; Emmerling R; Götz KU
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Mar; 99(3):1999-2004. PubMed ID: 26723131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Accuracy of genomic prediction using deregressed breeding values estimated from purebred and crossbred offspring phenotypes in pigs.
    Hidalgo AM; Bastiaansen JW; Lopes MS; Veroneze R; Groenen MA; de Koning DJ
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Jul; 93(7):3313-21. PubMed ID: 26440000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of cow reference group on validation reliability of genomic evaluation.
    Koivula M; Strandén I; Aamand GP; Mäntysaari EA
    Animal; 2016 Jun; 10(6):1061-6. PubMed ID: 27075712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. On the value of the phenotypes in the genomic era.
    Gonzalez-Recio O; Coffey MP; Pryce JE
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Dec; 97(12):7905-15. PubMed ID: 25453600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Improving accuracy of genomic predictions within and between dairy cattle breeds with imputed high-density single nucleotide polymorphism panels.
    Erbe M; Hayes BJ; Matukumalli LK; Goswami S; Bowman PJ; Reich CM; Mason BA; Goddard ME
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Jul; 95(7):4114-29. PubMed ID: 22720968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Modeling heterogeneous (co)variances from adjacent-SNP groups improves genomic prediction for milk protein composition traits.
    Gebreyesus G; Lund MS; Buitenhuis B; Bovenhuis H; Poulsen NA; Janss LG
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Dec; 49(1):89. PubMed ID: 29207947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Optimization of a genomic breeding program for a moderately sized dairy cattle population.
    Reiner-Benaim A; Ezra E; Weller JI
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Apr; 100(4):2892-2904. PubMed ID: 28189326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Genomic selection in a pig population including information from slaughtered full sibs of boars within a sib-testing program.
    Samorè AB; Buttazzoni L; Gallo M; Russo V; Fontanesi L
    Animal; 2015 May; 9(5):750-9. PubMed ID: 25510405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Genomic prediction for Nordic Red Cattle using one-step and selection index blending.
    Su G; Madsen P; Nielsen US; Mäntysaari EA; Aamand GP; Christensen OF; Lund MS
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Feb; 95(2):909-17. PubMed ID: 22281355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of heritabilities of dairy traits in Australian Holstein-Friesian cattle from genomic and pedigree data and implications for genomic evaluations.
    Haile-Mariam M; Nieuwhof GJ; Beard KT; Konstatinov KV; Hayes BJ
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2013 Feb; 130(1):20-31. PubMed ID: 23317062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Genotyping strategies for genomic selection in small dairy cattle populations.
    Jiménez-Montero JA; González-Recio O; Alenda R
    Animal; 2012 Aug; 6(8):1216-24. PubMed ID: 23217224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Empirical and deterministic accuracies of across-population genomic prediction.
    Wientjes YC; Veerkamp RF; Bijma P; Bovenhuis H; Schrooten C; Calus MP
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):5. PubMed ID: 25885467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The impact of selective genotyping on the response to selection using single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction.
    Howard JT; Rathje TA; Bruns CE; Wilson-Wells DF; Kachman SD; Spangler ML
    J Anim Sci; 2018 Nov; 96(11):4532-4542. PubMed ID: 30107560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.