These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26712102)

  • 1. Risk Prediction Models for Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review.
    Gray EP; Teare MD; Stevens J; Archer R
    Clin Lung Cancer; 2016 Mar; 17(2):95-106. PubMed ID: 26712102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Risk prediction models for selection of lung cancer screening candidates: A retrospective validation study.
    Ten Haaf K; Jeon J; Tammemägi MC; Han SS; Kong CY; Plevritis SK; Feuer EJ; de Koning HJ; Steyerberg EW; Meza R
    PLoS Med; 2017 Apr; 14(4):e1002277. PubMed ID: 28376113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Deep Learning Using Chest Radiographs to Identify High-Risk Smokers for Lung Cancer Screening Computed Tomography: Development and Validation of a Prediction Model.
    Lu MT; Raghu VK; Mayrhofer T; Aerts HJWL; Hoffmann U
    Ann Intern Med; 2020 Nov; 173(9):704-713. PubMed ID: 32866413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Implications of Nine Risk Prediction Models for Selecting Ever-Smokers for Computed Tomography Lung Cancer Screening.
    Katki HA; Kovalchik SA; Petito LC; Cheung LC; Jacobs E; Jemal A; Berg CD; Chaturvedi AK
    Ann Intern Med; 2018 Jul; 169(1):10-19. PubMed ID: 29800127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. OWL: an optimized and independently validated machine learning prediction model for lung cancer screening based on the UK Biobank, PLCO, and NLST populations.
    Pan Z; Zhang R; Shen S; Lin Y; Zhang L; Wang X; Ye Q; Wang X; Chen J; Zhao Y; Christiani DC; Li Y; Chen F; Wei Y
    EBioMedicine; 2023 Feb; 88():104443. PubMed ID: 36701900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Selecting High-Risk Individuals for Lung Cancer Screening: A Prospective Evaluation of Existing Risk Models and Eligibility Criteria in the German EPIC Cohort.
    Li K; Hüsing A; Sookthai D; Bergmann M; Boeing H; Becker N; Kaaks R
    Cancer Prev Res (Phila); 2015 Sep; 8(9):777-85. PubMed ID: 26076698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identifying high risk individuals for targeted lung cancer screening: Independent validation of the PLCO
    Weber M; Yap S; Goldsbury D; Manners D; Tammemagi M; Marshall H; Brims F; McWilliams A; Fong K; Kang YJ; Caruana M; Banks E; Canfell K
    Int J Cancer; 2017 Jul; 141(2):242-253. PubMed ID: 28249359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model for Second Primary Lung Cancer.
    Choi E; Sanyal N; Ding VY; Gardner RM; Aredo JV; Lee J; Wu JT; Hickey TP; Barrett B; Riley TL; Wilkens LR; Leung AN; Le Marchand L; Tammemägi MC; Hung RJ; Amos CI; Freedman ND; Cheng I; Wakelee HA; Han SS
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2022 Jan; 114(1):87-96. PubMed ID: 34255071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative performance of lung cancer risk models to define lung screening eligibility in the United Kingdom.
    Robbins HA; Alcala K; Swerdlow AJ; Schoemaker MJ; Wareham N; Travis RC; Crosbie PAJ; Callister M; Baldwin DR; Landy R; Johansson M
    Br J Cancer; 2021 Jun; 124(12):2026-2034. PubMed ID: 33846525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Population risk prediction models for incident heart failure: a systematic review.
    Echouffo-Tcheugui JB; Greene SJ; Papadimitriou L; Zannad F; Yancy CW; Gheorghiade M; Butler J
    Circ Heart Fail; 2015 May; 8(3):438-47. PubMed ID: 25737496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnostic test accuracy of nutritional tools used to identify undernutrition in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review.
    Håkonsen SJ; Pedersen PU; Bath-Hextall F; Kirkpatrick P
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 May; 13(4):141-87. PubMed ID: 26447079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the accuracy of the PLCO
    Jantzen R; Ezer N; Camilleri-Broët S; Tammemägi MC; Broët P
    CMAJ Open; 2023; 11(2):E314-E322. PubMed ID: 37041013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predictive accuracy of the Liverpool Lung Project risk model for stratifying patients for computed tomography screening for lung cancer: a case-control and cohort validation study.
    Raji OY; Duffy SW; Agbaje OF; Baker SG; Christiani DC; Cassidy A; Field JK
    Ann Intern Med; 2012 Aug; 157(4):242-50. PubMed ID: 22910935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cumulative nonsmoking risk factors increase the probability of developing lung cancer.
    Bravo-Iñiguez CE; Fox SW; De Leon LE; Tarascio JN; Jaklitsch MT; Jacobson FL
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2019 Oct; 158(4):1248-1254.e1. PubMed ID: 31248631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Blood-Based Biomarker Panel for Personalized Lung Cancer Risk Assessment.
    Fahrmann JF; Marsh T; Irajizad E; Patel N; Murage E; Vykoukal J; Dennison JB; Do KA; Ostrin E; Spitz MR; Lam S; Shete S; Meza R; Tammemägi MC; Feng Z; Hanash SM
    J Clin Oncol; 2022 Mar; 40(8):876-883. PubMed ID: 34995129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The performance of risk prediction models for pre-eclampsia using routinely collected maternal characteristics and comparison with models that include specialised tests and with clinical guideline decision rules: a systematic review.
    Al-Rubaie Z; Askie LM; Ray JG; Hudson HM; Lord SJ
    BJOG; 2016 Aug; 123(9):1441-52. PubMed ID: 27225348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Comparative Modeling Analysis of Risk-Based Lung Cancer Screening Strategies.
    Ten Haaf K; Bastani M; Cao P; Jeon J; Toumazis I; Han SS; Plevritis SK; Blom EF; Kong CY; Tammemägi MC; Feuer EJ; Meza R; de Koning HJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2020 May; 112(5):466-479. PubMed ID: 31566216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.