218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26712374)
1. The utility of metabolic activation mixtures containing human hepatic post-mitochondrial supernatant (S9) for in vitro genetic toxicity assessment.
Cox JA; Fellows MD; Hashizume T; White PA
Mutagenesis; 2016 Mar; 31(2):117-30. PubMed ID: 26712374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Application of the TGx-28.65 transcriptomic biomarker to classify genotoxic and non-genotoxic chemicals in human TK6 cells in the presence of rat liver S9.
Yauk CL; Buick JK; Williams A; Swartz CD; Recio L; Li HH; Fornace AJ; Thomson EM; Aubrecht J
Environ Mol Mutagen; 2016 May; 57(4):243-60. PubMed ID: 26946220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Advantage of the use of human liver S9 in the Ames test.
Hakura A; Suzuki S; Satoh T
Mutat Res; 1999 Jan; 438(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 9858674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Salmonella/human S9 mutagenicity test: a collaborative study with 58 compounds.
Hakura A; Shimada H; Nakajima M; Sui H; Kitamoto S; Suzuki S; Satoh T
Mutagenesis; 2005 May; 20(3):217-28. PubMed ID: 15843387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How to reduce false positive results when undertaking in vitro genotoxicity testing and thus avoid unnecessary follow-up animal tests: Report of an ECVAM Workshop.
Kirkland D; Pfuhler S; Tweats D; Aardema M; Corvi R; Darroudi F; Elhajouji A; Glatt H; Hastwell P; Hayashi M; Kasper P; Kirchner S; Lynch A; Marzin D; Maurici D; Meunier JR; Müller L; Nohynek G; Parry J; Parry E; Thybaud V; Tice R; van Benthem J; Vanparys P; White P
Mutat Res; 2007 Mar; 628(1):31-55. PubMed ID: 17293159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens I. Sensitivity, specificity and relative predictivity.
Kirkland D; Aardema M; Henderson L; Müller L
Mutat Res; 2005 Jul; 584(1-2):1-256. PubMed ID: 15979392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mutagens in surface waters: a review.
Ohe T; Watanabe T; Wakabayashi K
Mutat Res; 2004 Nov; 567(2-3):109-49. PubMed ID: 15572284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative study in the Ames test of benzo[a]pyrene and 2-aminoanthracene metabolic activation using rat hepatic S9 and hepatocytes following in vivo or in vitro induction.
Jemnitz K; Veres Z; Torok G; Toth E; Vereczkey L
Mutagenesis; 2004 May; 19(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15123791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of p-nitrotoluene (CAS no. 99-99-0) in F344/N rats and B6C3F(1) mice (feed studies).
National Toxicology Program
Natl Toxicol Program Tech Rep Ser; 2002 May; (498):1-277. PubMed ID: 12118261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Application of simplified in vitro screening tests to detect genotoxicity of aristolochic acid.
Zhang H; Cifone MA; Murli H; Erexson GL; Mecchi MS; Lawlor TE
Food Chem Toxicol; 2004 Dec; 42(12):2021-8. PubMed ID: 15500939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mutagenicity in V79 cells does not correlate with carcinogenity in small rodents for 12 aromatic amines.
Fassina G; Abbondandolo A; Mariani L; Taningher M; Parodi S
J Toxicol Environ Health; 1990; 29(1):109-30. PubMed ID: 2299684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Mutagenicity of mixtures of halogenated aliphatic hydrocarbons and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the Ames test with TA98 and TA100].
Kevekordes S; Porzig J; Gebel T; Dunkelberg H
Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1998 Feb; 200(5-6):531-41. PubMed ID: 9531725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The mutagenic hazards of aquatic sediments: a review.
Chen G; White PA
Mutat Res; 2004 Nov; 567(2-3):151-225. PubMed ID: 15572285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. 3Rs-friendly approach to exogenous metabolic activation that supports high-throughput genetic toxicology testing.
Tian S; Cyr A; Zeise K; Bryce SM; Hall N; Bemis JC; Dertinger SD
Environ Mol Mutagen; 2020 Apr; 61(4):408-432. PubMed ID: 32039521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantitative analysis of the relative mutagenicity of five chemical constituents of tobacco smoke in the mouse lymphoma assay.
Guo X; Heflich RH; Dial SL; Richter PA; Moore MM; Mei N
Mutagenesis; 2016 May; 31(3):287-96. PubMed ID: 26001754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Application of the in vitro rat hepatocyte micronucleus assay in genetic toxicology testing.
Müller-Tegethoff K; Kersten B; Kasper P; Müller L
Mutat Res; 1997 Aug; 392(1-2):125-38. PubMed ID: 9269337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Coumarin chemoprotection against aflatoxin B1-induced gene mutation in a mammalian cell system: a species difference in mutagen activation and protection with chick embryo and rat liver S9.
Goeger DE; Anderson KE; Hsie AW
Environ Mol Mutagen; 1998; 32(1):64-74. PubMed ID: 9707100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is a liver comparable to a liver? A comparison of different rat-derived S9-fractions with a biotechnological animal-free alternative in the Ames fluctuation assay.
Brendt J; Crawford SE; Velki M; Xiao H; Thalmann B; Hollert H; Schiwy A
Sci Total Environ; 2021 Mar; 759():143522. PubMed ID: 33246726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Greater effectiveness of hepatocyte and liver S9 preparations from hamsters than rat preparations in activating N-nitroso compounds to metabolites mutagenic to Salmonella.
Raineri R; Poiley JA; Andrews AW; Pienta RJ; Lijinsky W
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1981 Nov; 67(5):1117-22. PubMed ID: 6946249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. SOS chromotest results in a broader context: empirical relationships between genotoxic potency, mutagenic potency, and carcinogenic potency.
White PA; Rasmussen JB
Environ Mol Mutagen; 1996; 27(4):270-305. PubMed ID: 8665872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
