116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26713264)
1. The micropolyurethane foam-coated Diagon/Gel(®)4Two implant in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery - 3-year results of an ongoing study.
Brunnert KE
GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW; 2015; 4():Doc20. PubMed ID: 26713264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis of Diagon/Gel
Hachenberg J; Gundermann J; Fritsch H; Malter W; Steinkassserer L; Hillemanns P; Eichler C
In Vivo; 2024; 38(1):380-384. PubMed ID: 38148063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cohesive silicone gel breast implants in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery.
Brown MH; Shenker R; Silver SA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Sep; 116(3):768-79; discussion 780-1. PubMed ID: 16141814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Diagon/Gel Implant: A Preliminary Report of 894 Cases.
Stan C; Biggs T
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2017 Jul; 5(7):e1393. PubMed ID: 28831340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical experience with a fourth-generation textured silicone gel breast implant: a review of 1012 Mentor MemoryGel breast implants.
Stevens WG; Pacella SJ; Gear AJ; Freeman ME; McWhorter C; Tenenbaum MJ; Stoker DA
Aesthet Surg J; 2008; 28(6):642-7. PubMed ID: 19083592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The In Vivo Pericapsular Tissue Response to Modern Polyurethane Breast Implants.
Frame J; Kamel D; Olivan M; Cintra H
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2015 Oct; 39(5):713-23. PubMed ID: 26304599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Immediate Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction after Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: Traditional Subpectoral Technique versus Direct-to-Implant Prepectoral Reconstruction without Acellular Dermal Matrix.
Franceschini G; Scardina L; Di Leone A; Terribile DA; Sanchez AM; Magno S; D'Archi S; Franco A; Mason EJ; Carnassale B; Murando F; Orlandi A; Barone Adesi L; Visconti G; Salgarello M; Masetti R
J Pers Med; 2021 Feb; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 33671712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Role of bacterial biofilms in patients after reconstructive and aesthetic breast implant surgery.
Rieger UM; Raschke GF; Frei R; Djedovic G; Pierer G; Trampuz A
J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2014; 24(2-3):131-8. PubMed ID: 25272211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Immediate direct-to-implant breast reconstruction using anatomical implants.
Kim SE; Jung DW; Chung KJ; Lee JH; Kim TG; Kim YH; Lee SJ; Kang SH; Choi JE
Arch Plast Surg; 2014 Sep; 41(5):529-34. PubMed ID: 25276645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Experimental total wrapping of breast implants with acellular dermal matrix: a preventive tool against capsular contracture in breast surgery?
Schmitz M; Bertram M; Kneser U; Keller AK; Horch RE
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Oct; 66(10):1382-9. PubMed ID: 23764323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective study comparing two brands of cohesive gel breast implants with anatomic shape: 5-year follow-up evaluation.
Niechajev I; Jurell G; Lohjelm L
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2007; 31(6):697-710. PubMed ID: 17653683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Polyurethane-coated breast implants revisited: a 30-year follow-up.
Castel N; Soon-Sutton T; Deptula P; Flaherty A; Parsa FD
Arch Plast Surg; 2015 Mar; 42(2):186-93. PubMed ID: 25798390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Aesthetic and technical refinements in latissimus dorsi implant breast reconstruction: a 15-year experience.
Pacella SJ; Vogel JE; Locke MB; Codner MA
Aesthet Surg J; 2011 Feb; 31(2):190-9. PubMed ID: 21317117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical outcome and patient satisfaction with the use of bovine-derived acellular dermal matrix (SurgiMend™) in implant based immediate reconstruction following skin sparing mastectomy: A prospective observational study in a single centre.
Headon H; Kasem A; Manson A; Choy C; Carmichael AR; Mokbel K
Surg Oncol; 2016 Jun; 25(2):104-10. PubMed ID: 27312036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Breast implant stability in the subfascial plane and the new shaped silicone gel breast implants.
Sampaio Góes JC
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2010 Feb; 34(1):23-28. PubMed ID: 19936826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Eight-year follow-up data from the U.S. clinical trial for Sientra's FDA-approved round and shaped implants with high-strength cohesive silicone gel.
Stevens WG; Harrington J; Alizadeh K; Broadway D; Zeidler K; Godinez TB
Aesthet Surg J; 2015 May; 35 Suppl 1():S3-10. PubMed ID: 25948657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Back to the future: a 15-year experience with polyurethane foam-covered breast implants using the partial-subfascial technique.
de la Peña-Salcedo JA; Soto-Miranda MA; Lopez-Salguero JF
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Apr; 36(2):331-8. PubMed ID: 22179850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term safety and efficacy of polyurethane foam-covered breast implants.
Handel N; Gutierrez J
Aesthet Surg J; 2006; 26(3):265-74. PubMed ID: 19338905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the Explantation Rate of Poly Implant Prothèse, Allergan, and Pérouse Silicone Breast Implants within the First Four Years after Reconstructive Surgery before the Poly Implant Prothèse Alert by the French Regulatory Authority.
Leduey A; Mazouni C; Leymarie N; Alkhashnam H; Sarfati B; Garbay JR; Gaudin A; Kolb F; Rimareix F
Int J Breast Cancer; 2015; 2015():519497. PubMed ID: 26543648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term outcomes with the McGhan Style 153 dual-lumen breast implant: Implications for future implant design.
Hammond DC; Schmitt WP
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2016 Sep; 69(9):1211-7. PubMed ID: 27406256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
