These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26714043)
21. Automatic intelligibility assessment of speakers after laryngeal cancer by means of acoustic modeling. Bocklet T; Riedhammer K; Nöth E; Eysholdt U; Haderlein T J Voice; 2012 May; 26(3):390-7. PubMed ID: 21820272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Quality of life and voice in patients with laryngeal carcinoma: a posttreatment comparison of laryngectomy (salvage surgery) versus radiotherapy. Finizia C; Hammerlid E; Westin T; Lindström J Laryngoscope; 1998 Oct; 108(10):1566-73. PubMed ID: 9778303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Intelligibility in Down syndrome: Effect of measurement method and listener experience. O'Leary D; Lee A; O'Toole C; Gibbon F Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2021 May; 56(3):501-511. PubMed ID: 33783924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A comparison of the speech acceptability of good and excellent esophageal and tracheoesophageal speakers. Trudeau MD J Commun Disord; 1987 Feb; 20(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 3819002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Relevance of psychosocial factors in speech rehabilitation after laryngectomy]. Singer S; Fuchs M; Dietz A; Klemm E; Kienast U; Meyer A; Oeken J; Täschner R; Wulke C; Schwarz R Laryngorhinootologie; 2007 Dec; 86(12):867-74. PubMed ID: 17713877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Speech intelligibility and perceptions of communication effectiveness by speakers with dysarthria following traumatic brain injury and their communication partners. McAuliffe MJ; Carpenter S; Moran C Brain Inj; 2010; 24(12):1408-15. PubMed ID: 20858025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Dialect identification, intelligibility ratings, and acceptability ratings of dysarthric speech in two American English dialects. Laures-Gore J; Rogers CR; Griffey H; Rice KG; Russell S; Frankel M; Patel R Clin Linguist Phon; 2024 Nov; 38(11):1055-1066. PubMed ID: 38246149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Objective and subjective voice outcomes after total laryngectomy: a systematic review. van Sluis KE; van der Molen L; van Son RJJH; Hilgers FJM; Bhairosing PA; van den Brekel MWM Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Jan; 275(1):11-26. PubMed ID: 29086803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Predicting Intelligibility Deficits in Parkinson's Disease With Perceptual Speech Ratings. Chiu YF; Neel A J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Feb; 63(2):433-443. PubMed ID: 32097080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Voice and speech after laryngectomy. Stajner-Katusić S; Horga D; Musura M; Globlek D Clin Linguist Phon; 2006; 20(2-3):195-203. PubMed ID: 16428237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The influence of clear speech on auditory-perceptual judgments of electrolaryngeal speech. Cox SR; Doyle PC J Commun Disord; 2018; 75():25-36. PubMed ID: 30005317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A Comparative Study of Auditory-Perceptual Speech Measures for the Early Detection of Mild Speech Impairments. Kuruvilla-Dugdale M; Threlkeld K; Salazar M; Nolan G; Heidrick L Semin Speech Lang; 2019 Nov; 40(5):394-406. PubMed ID: 31426103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The influence of speaker and listener variables on intelligibility of dysarthric speech. Patel R; Usher N; Kember H; Russell S; Laures-Gore J J Commun Disord; 2014; 51():13-8. PubMed ID: 25113966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Assessing self-reported measures of voice disability in tracheoesophageal speakers. Day AM; Doyle PC J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2010 Dec; 39(6):762-8. PubMed ID: 21144376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Functional speech outcomes after laryngectomy and pharyngolaryngectomy. McAuliffe MJ; Ward EC; Bassett L; Perkins K Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2000 Jun; 126(6):705-9. PubMed ID: 10864105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The Impact of Dysphonic Voices on Healthy Listeners: Listener Reaction Times, Speech Intelligibility, and Listener Comprehension. Evitts PM; Starmer H; Teets K; Montgomery C; Calhoun L; Schulze A; MacKenzie J; Adams L Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2016 Nov; 25(4):561-575. PubMed ID: 27784031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Sensitivity of the Communicative Participation Item Bank for Measuring Patient-Reported Outcomes After Treatment of Unilateral Vocal Fold Immobility. Baylor C; Merati AL; Eadie T; Kapsner-Smith M; Meyer TK; Britton D; Mach H; Patel S; Yorkston K JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2021 Nov; 147(11):933-942. PubMed ID: 34529046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Dutch translation and validation of the Communicative Participation Item Bank (CPIB)-short form. van Sluis KE; Passchier E; van Son RJJH; van der Molen L; Stuiver M; van den Brekel MWM; Van den Steen L; Kalf JG; van Nuffelen G Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2023 Jan; 58(1):124-137. PubMed ID: 36063423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Intelligibility of tracheoesophageal speech among naive listeners. Smith LF; Calhoun KH South Med J; 1994 Mar; 87(3):333-5. PubMed ID: 8134853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]