232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26714105)
1. Acknowledging selection at sub-organismal levels resolves controversy on pro-cooperation mechanisms.
Shou W
Elife; 2015 Dec; 4():. PubMed ID: 26714105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Spatial self-organization favors heterotypic cooperation over cheating.
Momeni B; Waite AJ; Shou W
Elife; 2013 Nov; 2():e00960. PubMed ID: 24220506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Rethinking mutualism stability: cheaters and the evolution of sanctions.
Frederickson ME
Q Rev Biol; 2013 Dec; 88(4):269-95. PubMed ID: 24552098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cheating can stabilize cooperation in mutualisms.
Foster KR; Kokko H
Proc Biol Sci; 2006 Sep; 273(1598):2233-9. PubMed ID: 16901844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Selection for cheating across disparate environments in the legume-rhizobium mutualism.
Porter SS; Simms EL
Ecol Lett; 2014 Sep; 17(9):1121-9. PubMed ID: 25039752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Economic game theory for mutualism and cooperation.
Archetti M; Scheuring I; Hoffman M; Frederickson ME; Pierce NE; Yu DW
Ecol Lett; 2011 Dec; 14(12):1300-12. PubMed ID: 22011186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Population structure reduces benefits from partner choice in mutualistic symbiosis.
Akçay E
Proc Biol Sci; 2017 Mar; 284(1850):. PubMed ID: 28298346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A general model for the evolution of mutualisms.
Foster KR; Wenseleers T
J Evol Biol; 2006 Jul; 19(4):1283-93. PubMed ID: 16780529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sanctions, Partner Recognition, and Variation in Mutualism.
Yoder JB; Tiffin P
Am Nat; 2017 Oct; 190(4):491-505. PubMed ID: 28937817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Let the right one in: a microeconomic approach to partner choice in mutualisms.
Archetti M; Ubeda F; Fudenberg D; Green J; Pierce NE; Yu DW
Am Nat; 2011 Jan; 177(1):75-85. PubMed ID: 21091210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Parasponia: a novel system for studying mutualism stability.
Behm JE; Geurts R; Kiers ET
Trends Plant Sci; 2014 Dec; 19(12):757-63. PubMed ID: 25239777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Explaining mutualism variation: a new evolutionary paradox?
Heath KD; Stinchcombe JR
Evolution; 2014 Feb; 68(2):309-17. PubMed ID: 24303853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The evolution of mutualism.
Leigh EG
J Evol Biol; 2010 Dec; 23(12):2507-28. PubMed ID: 20942825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How leaking and overproducing resources affect the evolutionary robustness of cooperative cross-feeding.
Stump SM; Johnson EC; Klausmeier CA
J Theor Biol; 2018 Oct; 454():278-291. PubMed ID: 29908186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Concurrent coevolution of intra-organismal cheaters and resisters.
Levin SR; Brock DA; Queller DC; Strassmann JE
J Evol Biol; 2015 Apr; 28(4):756-65. PubMed ID: 25772340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cheating in Mutualisms Promotes Diversity and Complexity.
Wechsler D; Bascompte J
Am Nat; 2022 Mar; 199(3):393-405. PubMed ID: 35175893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Economic contract theory tests models of mutualism.
Weyl EG; Frederickson ME; Yu DW; Pierce NE
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2010 Sep; 107(36):15712-6. PubMed ID: 20733067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Nothing better to do? Environment quality and the evolution of cooperation by partner choice.
Ecoffet P; Bredeche N; André JB
J Theor Biol; 2021 Oct; 527():110805. PubMed ID: 34107279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Maintenance of variation in mutualism by screening.
Archetti M
Evolution; 2019 Oct; 73(10):2036-2043. PubMed ID: 31388985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Negotiation, sanctions, and context dependency in the legume-Rhizobium mutualism.
Akçay E; Simms EL
Am Nat; 2011 Jul; 178(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 21670573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
