365 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26714312)
1. [Qualitative Research in Health Services Research - Discussion Paper, Part 3: Quality of Qualitative Research].
Stamer M; Güthlin C; Holmberg C; Karbach U; Patzelt C; Meyer T;
Gesundheitswesen; 2015 Dec; 77(12):966-75. PubMed ID: 26714312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Qualitative research in health services research - discussion paper, Part 2: Qualitative research in health services research in Germany - an overview].
Karbach U; Stamer M; Holmberg C; Güthlin C; Patzelt C; Meyer T;
Gesundheitswesen; 2012 Aug; 74(8-9):516-25. PubMed ID: 22941739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Qualitative research in health services research - discussion paper, Part 1: What is the idea?].
Meyer T; Karbach U; Holmberg C; Güthlin C; Patzelt C; Stamer M;
Gesundheitswesen; 2012 Aug; 74(8-9):510-5. PubMed ID: 22941738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Memorandum registry for health services research].
Müller D; Augustin M; Banik N; Baumann W; Bestehorn K; Kieschke J; Lefering R; Maier B; Mathis S; Rustenbach SJ; Sauerland S; Semler SC; Stausberg J; Sturm H; Unger C; Neugebauer EA
Gesundheitswesen; 2010 Nov; 72(11):824-39. PubMed ID: 20872343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis.
Patton MQ
Health Serv Res; 1999 Dec; 34(5 Pt 2):1189-208. PubMed ID: 10591279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Assessment of quality of life in health services research - conceptual, methodological and structural prerequisites].
Koller M; Neugebauer EA; Augustin M; Büssing A; Farin E; Klinkhammer-Schalke M; Lorenz W; Münch K; Petersen-Ewert C; Steinbüchel Nv; Wieseler B
Gesundheitswesen; 2009 Dec; 71(12):864-72. PubMed ID: 19806535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Two sets of qualitative research reporting guidelines: An analysis of the shortfalls.
King O
Res Nurs Health; 2021 Aug; 44(4):715-723. PubMed ID: 34018217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Participatory action research, mixed methods, and research teams: learning from philosophically juxtaposed methodologies for optimal research outcomes.
Sendall MC; McCosker LK; Brodie A; Hill M; Crane P
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Dec; 18(1):167. PubMed ID: 30541471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Quality control and assessment of qualitative interview in health care research].
Xie YM; Liao X
Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao; 2008 Jul; 6(7):668-73. PubMed ID: 18601845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Mixed Methods Studies in Health Services Research: Requirements, Challenges and the Question of Integration - a Discussion Paper from the Perspective of Qualitative Researchers].
von Kutzleben M; Baumgart V; Fink A; Harst L; Wicking N; Tsarouha E; Pohontsch NJ; Schunk M
Gesundheitswesen; 2023 Aug; 85(8-09):741-749. PubMed ID: 37253371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Memorandum III: "Methods for Health Services Research" (Part 1)].
Pfaff H; Glaeske G; Neugebauer EA; Schrappe M; ; ; ;
Gesundheitswesen; 2009 Aug; 71(8-9):505-10. PubMed ID: 19697288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Quantity versus quality: a review on current methodological dispute in health services research].
Sikorski C; Glaesmer H; Bramesfeld A
Psychiatr Prax; 2010 Oct; 37(7):322-8. PubMed ID: 20886397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Focus group interviews: a guide for palliative care researchers and clinicians.
Hudson P
Int J Palliat Nurs; 2003 May; 9(5):202-7. PubMed ID: 12819597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A
Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A hierarchy of evidence for assessing qualitative health research.
Daly J; Willis K; Small R; Green J; Welch N; Kealy M; Hughes E
J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Jan; 60(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 17161753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reconsidering 'ethics' and 'quality' in healthcare research: the case for an iterative ethical paradigm.
Stevenson FA; Gibson W; Pelletier C; Chrysikou V; Park S
BMC Med Ethics; 2015 May; 16():21. PubMed ID: 25952678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Aggregation of qualitative studies--From theory to practice: Patient priorities and family medicine/general practice evaluations.
Reis S; Hermoni D; Van-Raalte R; Dahan R; Borkan JM
Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Feb; 65(2):214-22. PubMed ID: 17010557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The study of client-provider interactions: a review of methodological issues.
Simmons R; Elias C
Stud Fam Plann; 1994; 25(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 8209391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
