These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26714340)

  • 21. Selection of the implant transgingival height for optimal biomechanical properties: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Sun Y; Kong L; Hu K; Xie C; Zhou H; Liu Y; Liu B
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 47(5):393-8. PubMed ID: 18977057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Influences of internal tapered abutment designs on bone stresses around a dental implant: three-dimensional finite element method with statistical evaluation.
    Chu CM; Huang HL; Hsu JT; Fuh LJ
    J Periodontol; 2012 Jan; 83(1):111-8. PubMed ID: 21563947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Influence of tapered and external hexagon connections on bone stresses around tilted dental implants: three-dimensional finite element method with statistical analysis.
    de Faria Almeida DA; Pellizzer EP; Verri FR; Santiago JF; de Carvalho PS
    J Periodontol; 2014 Feb; 85(2):261-9. PubMed ID: 23688104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Biomechanical evaluation of platform switching: different mismatch sizes, connection types, and implant protocols.
    Pessoa RS; Bezerra FJ; Sousa RM; Vander Sloten J; Casati MZ; Jaecques SV
    J Periodontol; 2014 Sep; 85(9):1161-71. PubMed ID: 24635544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Influence of different mucosal resiliency and denture reline on stress distribution in peri-implant bone tissue during osseointegration. A three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Bacchi A; Consani RL; Mesquita MF; dos Santos MB
    Gerodontology; 2012 Jun; 29(2):e833-7. PubMed ID: 21981046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Alveolar bone stress around implants with different abutment angulation: an FE-analysis of anterior maxilla.
    Sadrimanesh R; Siadat H; Sadr-Eshkevari P; Monzavi A; Maurer P; Rashad A
    Implant Dent; 2012 Jun; 21(3):196-201. PubMed ID: 22513498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The biomechanical analysis of relative position between implant and alveolar bone: finite element method.
    Huang CC; Lan TH; Lee HE; Wang CH
    J Periodontol; 2011 Mar; 82(3):489-96. PubMed ID: 20936917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of Implant-Abutment Connection Type on Stress Distribution in Peri-Implant Bone and Abutment Micromovement: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Torkzaban P; Ziaei N; Tootiaee B; Khoshhal M; Vafaee F; Panahandeh N
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2019; 29(2):113-124. PubMed ID: 32464020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A finite element analysis of two different dental implants: stress distribution in the prosthesis, abutment, implant, and supporting bone.
    Quaresma SE; Cury PR; Sendyk WR; Sendyk C
    J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18390236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of the effects of different implant apical designs on the magnitude and distribution of stress and strain in bone: a finite element analysis study.
    Kadkhodazadeh M; Lafzi A; Raoofi S; Khademi M; Amid R; Movahhedy MR; Torabi H
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2014; 24(2-3):109-19. PubMed ID: 25272209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Stress distribution around maxillary anterior implants as a factor of labial bone thickness and occlusal load angles: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Alikhasi M; Siadat H; Geramy A; Hassan-Ahangari A
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Feb; 40(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 21787209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Biomechanical effect of platform switching in implant dentistry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Chang CL; Chen CS; Hsu ML
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):295-304. PubMed ID: 20369087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of platform switching on implant crest bone stress: a finite element analysis.
    Schrotenboer J; Tsao YP; Kinariwala V; Wang HL
    Implant Dent; 2009 Jun; 18(3):260-9. PubMed ID: 19509536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of titanium and yttrium-stabilized zirconium dioxide abutments and implants.
    Çaglar A; Bal BT; Karakoca S; Aydın C; Yılmaz H; Sarısoy S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):961-9. PubMed ID: 22010077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of different fixture geometries on the stress distribution in mandibular peri-implant structures: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Degerliyurt K; Simsek B; Erkmen E; Eser A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Aug; 110(2):e1-11. PubMed ID: 20598590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Implant-bone load transfer mechanisms in complete-arch prostheses supported by four implants: a three-dimensional finite element approach.
    Baggi L; Pastore S; Di Girolamo M; Vairo G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Jan; 109(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 23328192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. High bone-implant contact achieved by photofunctionalization to reduce periimplant stress: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Ohyama T; Uchida T; Shibuya N; Nakabayashi S; Ishigami T; Ogawa T
    Implant Dent; 2013 Feb; 22(1):102-8. PubMed ID: 23314350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Three-dimensional finite elemental analysis of zygomatic implants in craniofacial structures.
    Ujigawa K; Kato Y; Kizu Y; Tonogi M; Yamane GY
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jul; 36(7):620-5. PubMed ID: 17517497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparative evaluation of implant designs: influence of diameter, length, and taper on strains in the alveolar crest. A three-dimensional finite-element analysis.
    Petrie CS; Williams JL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Aug; 16(4):486-94. PubMed ID: 16117775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Regular and switching platform: bone stress analysis with varying implant diameter.
    Vargas LC; de Almeida EO; Rocha EP; Kina S; Anchieta RB; Júnior AC; França FM
    J Oral Implantol; 2013 Jun; 39(3):326-31. PubMed ID: 21231868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.