151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26714825)
1. The reality of virtual anthropology: Comparing digitizer and laser scan data collection methods for the quantitative assessment of the cranium.
Algee-Hewitt BF; Wheat AD
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2016 May; 160(1):148-55. PubMed ID: 26714825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Error in geometric morphometric data collection: Combining data from multiple sources.
Robinson C; Terhune CE
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2017 Sep; 164(1):62-75. PubMed ID: 28573732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Testing repeatability and error of coordinate landmark data acquired from crania.
Ross AH; Williams S
J Forensic Sci; 2008 Jul; 53(4):782-5. PubMed ID: 18537868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Agreement and error rates associated with standardized data collection protocols for skeletal and dental data on 3D virtual subadult crania.
Corron LK; Broehl KA; Chu EY; Vlemincq-Mendieta T; Wolfe CA; Pilloud MA; Scott GR; Spradley MK; Stull KE
Forensic Sci Int; 2022 May; 334():111272. PubMed ID: 35316774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Measurement error using a SeeMaLab structured light 3D scanner against a Microscribe 3D digitizer.
Messer D; Svendsen MS; Galatius A; Olsen MT; Dahl VA; Conradsen K; Dahl AB
PeerJ; 2021; 9():e11804. PubMed ID: 34484981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluating causes of error in landmark-based data collection using scanners.
Shearer BM; Cooke SB; Halenar LB; Reber SL; Plummer JE; Delson E; Tallman M
PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0187452. PubMed ID: 29099867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. "What and how should we share?" An inter-method inter-observer comparison of measurement error with landmark-based craniometric datasets.
Bertsatos A; Gkaniatsou E; Papageorgopoulou C; Chovalopoulou ME
Anthropol Anz; 2020 Apr; 77(2):109-120. PubMed ID: 31851205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing Methods to Assess Intraobserver Measurement Error of 3D Craniofacial Landmarks Using Geometric Morphometrics Through a Digitizer Arm.
Menéndez LP
J Forensic Sci; 2017 May; 62(3):741-746. PubMed ID: 27874192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Technical note: 3D from standard digital photography of human crania-a preliminary assessment.
Katz D; Friess M
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2014 May; 154(1):152-8. PubMed ID: 24711122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Landmark Typology in Applied Morphometrics Studies: What's the Point?
Wärmländer SKTS; Garvin H; Guyomarc'h P; Petaros A; Sholts SB
Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2019 Jul; 302(7):1144-1153. PubMed ID: 30365240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Technical note: A new method for measuring long bone curvature using 3D landmarks and semi-landmarks.
De Groote I; Lockwood CA; Aiello LC
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2010 Apr; 141(4):658-64. PubMed ID: 20091851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Which cranial regions reflect molecular distances reliably in humans? Evidence from three-dimensional morphology.
Smith HF
Am J Hum Biol; 2009; 21(1):36-47. PubMed ID: 18663742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Variation within physical and digital craniometrics.
Lee M; Gerdau-Radonic K
Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Jan; 306():110092. PubMed ID: 31816484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of mandibular landmarks from computed tomography and 3D digitizer data.
Williams FL; Richtsmeier JT
Clin Anat; 2003 Nov; 16(6):494-500. PubMed ID: 14566895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of standard craniometric measurements using multiple data formats.
Richard AH; Parks CL; Monson KL
Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Sep; 242():177-185. PubMed ID: 25058451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the FaroArm Laser Scanner With the MicroScribe Digitizer Using Basicranial Measurements.
Vu AF; Chundury RV; Perry JD
J Craniofac Surg; 2017 Jul; 28(5):e460-e463. PubMed ID: 28665864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Genomic validation of the differential preservation of population history in modern human cranial anatomy.
Reyes-Centeno H; Ghirotto S; Harvati K
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2017 Jan; 162(1):170-179. PubMed ID: 27489014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reconstruction of the late Pleistocene human skull from Hofmeyr, South Africa.
Grine FE; Gunz P; Betti-Nash L; Neubauer S; Morris AG
J Hum Evol; 2010 Jul; 59(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 20546848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison study of different facial soft tissue analysis methods.
Kook MS; Jung S; Park HJ; Oh HK; Ryu SY; Cho JH; Lee JS; Yoon SJ; Kim MS; Shin HK
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):648-56. PubMed ID: 24954528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Geometric morphometrics and virtual anthropology: advances in human evolutionary studies.
Rein TR; Harvati K
Anthropol Anz; 2014; 71(1-2):41-55. PubMed ID: 24818438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
