750 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26715077)
1. Key stakeholder perceptions about consent to participate in acute illness research: a rapid, systematic review to inform epi/pandemic research preparedness.
Gobat NH; Gal M; Francis NA; Hood K; Watkins A; Turner J; Moore R; Webb SA; Butler CC; Nichol A
Trials; 2015 Dec; 16():591. PubMed ID: 26715077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of interventions for informed consent for randomised controlled trials (ELICIT): protocol for a systematic review of the literature and identification of a core outcome set using a Delphi survey.
Gillies K; Entwistle V; Treweek SP; Fraser C; Williamson PR; Campbell MK
Trials; 2015 Oct; 16():484. PubMed ID: 26507504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Re-evaluating ethical concerns in planned emergency research involving critically ill patients: an interpretation of the guidance document from the United States Food and Drug Administration.
Smischney NJ; Onigkeit JA; Hinds RF; Nicholson WT
J Clin Ethics; 2015; 26(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 25794295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Deferred proxy consent in emergency critical care research: ethically valid and practically feasible.
Jansen TC; Kompanje EJ; Bakker J
Crit Care Med; 2009 Jan; 37(1 Suppl):S65-8. PubMed ID: 19104227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Participant views and experiences of participating in HIV research in sub-Saharan Africa: a qualitative systematic review.
Nalubega S; Evans C
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jun; 13(5):330-420. PubMed ID: 26455613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The DiReCT study - improving recruitment into clinical trials: a mixed methods study investigating the ethical acceptability, feasibility and recruitment yield of the cohort multiple randomised controlled trials design.
Richards DA; Ross S; Robens S; Borglin G
Trials; 2014 Oct; 15():398. PubMed ID: 25318374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of deferred consent for severely ill children in a multi-centre phase III trial.
Maitland K; Molyneux S; Boga M; Kiguli S; Lang T
Trials; 2011 Mar; 12():90. PubMed ID: 21453454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Trials using deferred consent in the emergency setting: a systematic review and narrative synthesis of stakeholders' attitudes.
Fitzpatrick A; Wood F; Shepherd V
Trials; 2022 May; 23(1):411. PubMed ID: 35578362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Understanding the decisions of cancer clinical trial participants to enter research studies: factors associated with informed consent, patient satisfaction, and decisional regret.
Stryker JE; Wray RJ; Emmons KM; Winer E; Demetri G
Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Oct; 63(1-2):104-9. PubMed ID: 16242898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Experience of Surrogate Decision Makers on Being Approached for Consent for Patient Participation in Research. A Multicenter Study.
Burns KE; Prats CJ; Maione M; Lanceta M; Zubrinich C; Jeffs L; Smith OM;
Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2017 Feb; 14(2):238-245. PubMed ID: 27849142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The psychology of "cure" - unique challenges to consent processes in HIV cure research in South Africa.
Moodley K; Staunton C; Rossouw T; de Roubaix M; Duby Z; Skinner D
BMC Med Ethics; 2019 Jan; 20(1):9. PubMed ID: 30678664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Waiver of informed consent in pediatric resuscitation research: a systematic review.
Eltorki M; Uleryk E; Freedman SB
Acad Emerg Med; 2013 Aug; 20(8):822-34. PubMed ID: 24033626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Systematic review and metasummary of attitudes toward research in emergency medical conditions.
Limkakeng AT; de Oliveira LL; Moreira T; Phadtare A; Garcia Rodrigues C; Hocker MB; McKinney R; Voils CI; Pietrobon R
J Med Ethics; 2014 Jun; 40(6):401-8. PubMed ID: 23665997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An approach to community consultation prior to initiating an emergency research study incorporating a waiver of informed consent.
Baren JM; Anicetti JP; Ledesma S; Biros MH; Mahabee-Gittens M; Lewis RJ
Acad Emerg Med; 1999 Dec; 6(12):1210-5. PubMed ID: 10609922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Research participants' perceptions and views on consent for biobank research: a review of empirical data and ethical analysis.
D'Abramo F; Schildmann J; Vollmann J
BMC Med Ethics; 2015 Sep; 16():60. PubMed ID: 26354520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Recruiting and consenting into a peripartum trial in an emergency setting: a qualitative study of the experiences and views of women and healthcare professionals.
Lawton J; Snowdon C; Morrow S; Norman JE; Denison FC; Hallowell N
Trials; 2016 Apr; 17():195. PubMed ID: 27066777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Consent and assent to participate in research from people with dementia.
Slaughter S; Cole D; Jennings E; Reimer MA
Nurs Ethics; 2007 Jan; 14(1):27-40. PubMed ID: 17334168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Researcher and study participants' perspectives of consent in clinical studies in four referral hospitals in Vietnam.
Van Nuil JI; Nguyen TTT; Le Nguyen TN; Nguyen VVC; Chambers M; Ta TDN; Merson L; Nguyen TPD; Hoang MTV; Parker M; Bull S; Kestelyn E
BMC Med Ethics; 2020 Jan; 21(1):4. PubMed ID: 31924199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Consent, including advanced consent, of older adults to research in care homes: a qualitative study of stakeholders' views in South Wales.
Wood F; Prout H; Bayer A; Duncan D; Nuttall J; Hood K; Butler CC;
Trials; 2013 Aug; 14():247. PubMed ID: 23937972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patient-Oriented Research Competencies in Health (PORCH) for patients, healthcare providers, decision-makers and researchers: protocol of a scoping review.
Mallidou AA; Frisch N; Doyle-Waters MM; MacLeod MLP; Ward J; Atherton P
Syst Rev; 2018 Jul; 7(1):101. PubMed ID: 30025543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
