These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26716719)

  • 1. A flexible patch based approach for combined denoising and contrast enhancement of digital X-ray images.
    Irrera P; Bloch I; Delplanque M
    Med Image Anal; 2016 Feb; 28():33-45. PubMed ID: 26716719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Resolution enhancement in digital x-ray imaging.
    Gravel P; Després P; Beaudoin G; de Guise JA
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2415-39. PubMed ID: 16675861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A method for modifying the image quality parameters of digital radiographic images.
    Saunders RS; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2003 Nov; 30(11):3006-17. PubMed ID: 14655948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Wavelet-based noise-model driven denoising algorithm for differential phase contrast mammography.
    Arboleda C; Wang Z; Stampanoni M
    Opt Express; 2013 May; 21(9):10572-89. PubMed ID: 23669913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Noise properties of chord-image reconstruction.
    Xia D; Yu L; Sidky EY; Zou Y; Zuo N; Pan X
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Oct; 26(10):1328-44. PubMed ID: 17948724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantification of the effect of system and object parameters on edge enhancement in phase-contrast radiography.
    Donnelly EF; Price RR; Pickens DR
    Med Phys; 2003 Nov; 30(11):2888-96. PubMed ID: 14655935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Image quality improvement in submillisievert computed tomographic colonography using a fast 3-dimensional noise reduction method.
    Gryspeerdt SS; Salazar P; Lefere P
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2014; 38(5):705-13. PubMed ID: 24834893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of x-ray pulse parameters on the image quality for moving objects in digital cardiac imaging.
    Guibelalde E; Vano E; Vaquero F; González L
    Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2819-25. PubMed ID: 15543789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Metal artifacts reduction in x-ray CT based on segmentation and forward-projection.
    Nawaz S; Fu J; Fan D
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(6):3287-93. PubMed ID: 25227038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the X-ray digital linear tomosynthesis reconstruction processing method for metal artifact reduction.
    Gomi T; Hirano H; Umeda T
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2009 Jun; 33(4):267-74. PubMed ID: 19237263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Edge enhancement algorithm for low-dose X-ray fluoroscopic imaging.
    Lee MS; Park CH; Kang MG
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 Dec; 152():45-52. PubMed ID: 29054260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patch-based near-optimal image denoising.
    Chatterjee P; Milanfar P
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2012 Apr; 21(4):1635-49. PubMed ID: 22020683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Initial phantom study comparing image quality in computed tomography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and new adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction v.
    Lim K; Kwon H; Cho J; Oh J; Yoon S; Kang M; Ha D; Lee J; Kang E
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(3):443-8. PubMed ID: 25654782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of time-efficient reconstruction methods in digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Svahn TM; Houssami N
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):331-6. PubMed ID: 25855075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sparse-view computed tomography image reconstruction via a combination of L(1) and SL(0) regularization.
    Qi H; Chen Z; Guo J; Zhou L
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2015; 26 Suppl 1():S1389-98. PubMed ID: 26405900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Locally optimized non-local means denoising for low-dose X-ray backscatter imagery.
    Tracey BH; Miller EL; Wu Y; Alvino C; Schiefele M; Al-Kofahi O
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2014; 22(5):569-86. PubMed ID: 25265919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reduction of anatomical noise in medical X-ray images.
    Tischenko O; Hoeschen C; Buhr E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):69-74. PubMed ID: 15933083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Statistical reconstruction for x-ray computed tomography using energy-integrating detectors.
    Lasio GM; Whiting BR; Williamson JF
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(8):2247-66. PubMed ID: 17404467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of radiographic techniques on the low-contrast detail detectability performance of digital radiography systems.
    Alsleem H; U P; Mong KS; Davidson R
    Radiol Technol; 2014; 85(6):614-22. PubMed ID: 25002641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relating noise to image quality indicators in CT examinations with tube current modulation.
    Solomon JB; Li X; Samei E
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Mar; 200(3):592-600. PubMed ID: 23436849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.