These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26716719)

  • 21. Reduction of artifacts induced by misaligned geometry in cone-beam CT.
    Sun Y; Hou Y; Hu J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Aug; 54(8):1461-71. PubMed ID: 17694867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Introduction of an effective method for the optimization of CT protocols using iterative reconstruction algorithms: comparison with patient data.
    Kordolaimi SD; Saradeas I; Ploussi A; Pantos I; Argentos S; Efstathopoulos EP
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Oct; 203(4):W434-9. PubMed ID: 25247973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Adaptive non-local means denoising of MR images with spatially varying noise levels.
    Manjón JV; Coupé P; Martí-Bonmatí L; Collins DL; Robles M
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jan; 31(1):192-203. PubMed ID: 20027588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Median prior constrained TV algorithm for sparse view low-dose CT reconstruction.
    Liu Y; Shangguan H; Zhang Q; Zhu H; Shu H; Gui Z
    Comput Biol Med; 2015 May; 60():117-31. PubMed ID: 25817533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of technical and anatomical noise in digital thorax X-ray images.
    Hoeschen C; Tischenko O; Buhr E; Illers H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):75-80. PubMed ID: 15933084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A wavelet-based spatially adaptive method for mammographic contrast enhancement.
    Sakellaropoulos P; Costaridou L; Panayiotakis G
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Mar; 48(6):787-803. PubMed ID: 12699195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Image denoising based on multiscale singularity detection for cone beam CT breast imaging.
    Zhong J; Ning R; Conover D
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Jun; 23(6):696-703. PubMed ID: 15191144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A method of using noise as a test pattern for determining image enhancement filters.
    Burgess AE; Ghandeharian H
    Phys Med Biol; 1994 Aug; 39(8):1313-8. PubMed ID: 15551569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. MRI noise estimation and denoising using non-local PCA.
    Manjón JV; Coupé P; Buades A
    Med Image Anal; 2015 May; 22(1):35-47. PubMed ID: 25725303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Medical image restoration with different types of noise.
    Sánchez MG; Vidal V; Verdú G; Mayo P; Rodenas F
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():4382-5. PubMed ID: 23366898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Multiresolution parametric estimation of transparent motions and denoising of fluoroscopic images.
    Auvray V; Liénard J; Bouthemy P
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2005; 8(Pt 2):352-60. PubMed ID: 16685979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of a novel method of noise reduction using computer-simulated mammograms.
    Tischenko O; Hoeschen C; Dance DR; Hunt RA; Maidment AD; Bakic PR
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):81-4. PubMed ID: 15933085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Efficient x-ray image enhancement algorithm using image fusion.
    Shen K; Wen Y; Cai Y
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2009; 17(3):207-20. PubMed ID: 19893213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Nonuniform noise propagation by using the ramp filter in fan-beam computed tomography.
    Zeng GL
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Jun; 23(6):690-5. PubMed ID: 15191143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Relationship between sharpness and noise in CT images reconstructed with different kernels.
    Eldevik K; Nordhøy W; Skretting A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):430-3. PubMed ID: 20181647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Application of the noise power spectrum in modern diagnostic MDCT: part II. Noise power spectra and signal to noise.
    Boedeker KL; McNitt-Gray MF
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(14):4047-61. PubMed ID: 17664594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An experimental method of determining relative phase-contrast factor for x-ray imaging systems.
    Wua X; Liu H
    Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):997-1002. PubMed ID: 15191283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Information entropy measure for evaluation of image quality.
    Tsai DY; Lee Y; Matsuyama E
    J Digit Imaging; 2008 Sep; 21(3):338-47. PubMed ID: 17577596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A comparative study of computer assisted assessment of image quality index for mammographic phantom images.
    Mayo P; Rodenas F; Verdú G; Villaescusa JI; Campayo JM
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 116(1-4 Pt 2):620-3. PubMed ID: 16604712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Noise in x-ray grating-based phase-contrast imaging.
    Weber T; Bartl P; Bayer F; Durst J; Haas W; Michel T; Ritter A; Anton G
    Med Phys; 2011 Jul; 38(7):4133-40. PubMed ID: 21859014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.