These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26717123)

  • 1. Evaluating the Sampling Performance of Exploratory and Cross-Validated DETECT Procedure with Imperfect Models.
    Zopluoglu C
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2015; 50(6):632-44. PubMed ID: 26717123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implications of Item Keying and Item Valence for the Investigation of Construct Dimensionality.
    Kam CC; Meyer JP
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2015; 50(4):457-69. PubMed ID: 26610157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of the likelihood ratio difference (G2 Diff) test for detecting unidimensionality in applications of the multidimensional Rasch model.
    Harrell-Williams L; Wolfe EW
    J Appl Meas; 2014; 15(3):267-75. PubMed ID: 24992250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Assessment of Dimensionality for Use in Item Response Theory.
    De Ayala RJ; Hertzog MA
    Multivariate Behav Res; 1991 Oct; 26(4):765-92. PubMed ID: 26751030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A procedure for evaluating sensitivity to within-person change: can mood measures in diary studies detect change reliably?
    Cranford JA; Shrout PE; Iida M; Rafaeli E; Yip T; Bolger N
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2006 Jul; 32(7):917-29. PubMed ID: 16738025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robust maximum marginal likelihood (RMML) estimation for item response theory models.
    Hong MR; Cheng Y
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Apr; 51(2):573-588. PubMed ID: 30350024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The value of item response theory in clinical assessment: a review.
    Thomas ML
    Assessment; 2011 Sep; 18(3):291-307. PubMed ID: 20644081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using multidimensional Rasch to enhance measurement precision: initial results from simulation and empirical studies.
    Mok MM; Xu K
    J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(1):27-43. PubMed ID: 23442326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the number of factors to retain in exploratory factor analysis for ordered categorical data.
    Yang Y; Xia Y
    Behav Res Methods; 2015 Sep; 47(3):756-72. PubMed ID: 24947054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Applying multilevel item response theory to vision-related quality of life in Dutch visually impaired elderly.
    van Nispen RM; Knol DL; Langelaan M; de Boer MR; Terwee CB; van Rens GH
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Aug; 84(8):710-20. PubMed ID: 17700335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A procedure for dimensionality analyses of response data from various test designs.
    Zhang J
    Psychometrika; 2013 Jan; 78(1):37-58. PubMed ID: 25107517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Comparison of Imputation Strategies for Ordinal Missing Data on Likert Scale Variables.
    Wu W; Jia F; Enders C
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2015; 50(5):484-503. PubMed ID: 26610248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Parameter recovery for the rating scale model using PARSCALE.
    French GA; Dodd BG
    J Outcome Meas; 1999; 3(2):176-99. PubMed ID: 10204326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A generalized dimensionality discrepancy measure for dimensionality assessment in multidimensional item response theory.
    Levy R; Svetina D
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 May; 64(Pt 2):208-32. PubMed ID: 21492129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Testing Group Mean Differences of Latent Variables in Multilevel Data Using Multiple-Group Multilevel CFA and Multilevel MIMIC Modeling.
    Kim ES; Cao C
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2015; 50(4):436-56. PubMed ID: 26610156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Testing multiple outcomes in repeated measures designs.
    Lix LM; Sajobi T
    Psychol Methods; 2010 Sep; 15(3):268-80. PubMed ID: 20822252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing DIF among small samples with separate calibration t and Mantel-Haenszel χ² statistics in the Rasch model.
    Bernstein I; Samuels E; Woo A; Hagge SL
    J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(4):389-99. PubMed ID: 24064579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predicting gender differences as latent variables: summed scores, and individual item responses: a methods case study.
    Pietrobon R; Taylor M; Guller U; Higgins LD; Jacobs DO; Carey T
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2004 Oct; 2():59. PubMed ID: 15500700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of confirmatory factor analysis and multidimensional Rasch models to investigate the dimensionality of test-taking motivation.
    Demars CE
    J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(2):179-96. PubMed ID: 23816595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A latent variable model approach to estimating systematic bias in the oversampling method.
    Hauner KK; Zinbarg RE; Revelle W
    Behav Res Methods; 2014 Sep; 46(3):786-97. PubMed ID: 24142836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.