These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26717123)

  • 61. Comparing the Effects of Different Smoothing Algorithms on the Assessment of Dimensionality of Ordered Categorical Items with Parallel Analysis.
    Debelak R; Tran US
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148143. PubMed ID: 26845032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Investigating the Utility of Fixed-margin Sampling in Network Psychometrics.
    Epskamp S; Fried EI; van Borkulo CD; Robinaugh DJ; Marsman M; Dalege J; Rhemtulla M; Cramer AOJ
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2021; 56(2):314-328. PubMed ID: 30463456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Central tendency and matched difference approaches for assessing interrater agreement.
    Burke MJ; Cohen A; Doveh E; Smith-Crowe K
    J Appl Psychol; 2018 Nov; 103(11):1198-1229. PubMed ID: 29963898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. R2 effect-size measures for mediation analysis.
    Fairchild AJ; Mackinnon DP; Taborga MP; Taylor AB
    Behav Res Methods; 2009 May; 41(2):486-98. PubMed ID: 19363189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Bootstrapping: a tool for clinical research.
    Walsh JF; Reznikoff M
    J Clin Psychol; 1990 Nov; 46(6):928-30. PubMed ID: 2286694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Algorithmic jingle jungle: A comparison of implementations of principal axis factoring and promax rotation in R and SPSS.
    Grieder S; Steiner MD
    Behav Res Methods; 2022 Feb; 54(1):54-74. PubMed ID: 34100201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Reducing the Bias of Norm Scores in Non-Representative Samples: Weighting as an Adjunct to Continuous Norming Methods.
    Gary S; Lenhard A; Lenhard W; Herzberg DS
    Assessment; 2023 Dec; 30(8):2491-2509. PubMed ID: 36794743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Disengagement with cognitive tasks decreases effect sizes.
    Duncan K; Davachi L
    Nat Hum Behav; 2018 Sep; 2(9):606. PubMed ID: 31346270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Implications of Item Keying and Item Valence for the Investigation of Construct Dimensionality.
    Kam CC; Meyer JP
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2015; 50(4):457-69. PubMed ID: 26610157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Performance of the likelihood ratio difference (G2 Diff) test for detecting unidimensionality in applications of the multidimensional Rasch model.
    Harrell-Williams L; Wolfe EW
    J Appl Meas; 2014; 15(3):267-75. PubMed ID: 24992250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. The Assessment of Dimensionality for Use in Item Response Theory.
    De Ayala RJ; Hertzog MA
    Multivariate Behav Res; 1991 Oct; 26(4):765-92. PubMed ID: 26751030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. A procedure for evaluating sensitivity to within-person change: can mood measures in diary studies detect change reliably?
    Cranford JA; Shrout PE; Iida M; Rafaeli E; Yip T; Bolger N
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2006 Jul; 32(7):917-29. PubMed ID: 16738025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Evaluating the Sampling Performance of Exploratory and Cross-Validated DETECT Procedure with Imperfect Models.
    Zopluoglu C
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2015; 50(6):632-44. PubMed ID: 26717123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. The value of item response theory in clinical assessment: a review.
    Thomas ML
    Assessment; 2011 Sep; 18(3):291-307. PubMed ID: 20644081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.