These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26717158)

  • 61. Risk analysis using fuzzy set theory of the accidental exposure of medical staff during brachytherapy procedures.
    Castiglia F; Giardina M; Tomarchio E
    J Radiol Prot; 2010 Mar; 30(1):49-62. PubMed ID: 20220212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. ERIDAS, a computer program for rapid calculation of internal doses from measurements of people in an emergency.
    Youngman MJ; Davis KE; Etherington G; Marsh JW
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 127(1-4):374-7. PubMed ID: 18003709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Emergency management in the early phase.
    Crick M; McKenna T; Buglova E; Winkler G; Martincic R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):7-17. PubMed ID: 15238649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Hospital response for children as a vulnerable population in radiological/nuclear incidents.
    Conway B; Pike J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Nov; 142(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 21041240
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Assessment and evaluation of the radiological situation in the late phase of a nuclear accident.
    Gering F; Weiss W; Wirth E; Stapel R; Jacob P; Müller H; Pröhl G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):25-9. PubMed ID: 15238651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. [Dosimetric system for assessing doses received by people occupationally exposed to external sources of ionizing radiation].
    Brodecki M; Domienik JU; Zmyślony M
    Med Pr; 2012; 63(5):607-17. PubMed ID: 23373330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. ICRP Publication 111 - Application of the Commission's recommendations to the protection of people living in long-term contaminated areas after a nuclear accident or a radiation emergency.
    Lochard J; Bogdevitch I; Gallego E; Hedemann-Jensen P; McEwan A; Nisbet A; Oudiz A; Oudiz T; Strand P; Janssens A; Lazo T; Carr Z; Sugier A; Burns P; Carboneras P; Cool D; Cooper J; Kai M; Lecomte JF; Liu H; Massera G; McGarry A; Mrabit K; Mrabit M; Sjöblom KL; Tsela A; Weiss W;
    Ann ICRP; 2009 Jun; 39(3):1-4, 7-62. PubMed ID: 20472181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Do medical physicists have a role in case of a nuclear or radiological emergency?
    Meghzifene A; Nüsslin F
    Phys Med; 2011 Jul; 27(3):121. PubMed ID: 21664565
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Standard radioassay technics--a status report.
    Moeller DW
    Health Lab Sci; 1967 Jul; 4(3):146-52. PubMed ID: 6071838
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. EPR dosimetry in a mixed neutron and gamma radiation field.
    Trompier F; Fattibene P; Tikunov D; Bartolotta A; Carosi A; Doca MC
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):437-42. PubMed ID: 15353687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. External dosimetry in the aftermath of a radiological terrorist event.
    Klemic GA; Bailey PD; Miller KM; Monetti MA
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 120(1-4):242-9. PubMed ID: 16606662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Results of a Division of Radiation Protection scrap yard exercise.
    James JD
    Health Phys; 2001 Feb; 80(2 Suppl):S31-8. PubMed ID: 11197512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Czech results at criticality dosimetry intercomparison 2002.
    Frantisek S; Jaroslav T
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):455-8. PubMed ID: 15353690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Development of a new CBR-based platform for human contamination emergency situations.
    Farah J; Henriet J; Broggio D; Laurent R; Fontaine E; Chebel-Morello B; Sauget M; Salomon M; Makovicka L; Franck D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):564-70. PubMed ID: 21115445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. A computational tool based on voxel geometry for dose reconstruction of a radiological accident due to external exposure.
    Lemosquet A; Clairand I; de Carlan L; Franck D; Aubineau-Lanièce I; Bottollier-Depois JF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):449-54. PubMed ID: 15353689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. The second EURADOS intercomparison of national network systems used to provide early warning of a nuclear accident.
    Sáez-Vergara JC; Thompson IM; Gurriarán R; Dombrowski H; Funck E; Neumaier S;
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 123(2):190-208. PubMed ID: 16971396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Revision of the Euratom Basic Safety Standards Directive--current status.
    Mundigl S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):12-6. PubMed ID: 20959342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Reference dosimetry measurements for the international intercomparison of criticality accident dosimetry SILENE 9-21 June 2002.
    Asselineau B; Trompier F; Texier C; Itié C; Médioni R; Tikunov D; Muller H; Pelcot G;
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):459-64. PubMed ID: 15353691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Key sources of imprecision in radiological emergency response assessments.
    Haywood SM
    J Radiol Prot; 2008 Jun; 28(2):169-83. PubMed ID: 18495989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. The role of the health physicist in nuclear security.
    Waller EJ; van Maanen J
    Health Phys; 2015 Apr; 108(4):468-76. PubMed ID: 25706142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.