These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26717163)
1. Radiation and Regulation in a Post-Fukushima World. Macfarlane A Health Phys; 2016 Feb; 110(2):118-22. PubMed ID: 26717163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lessons learned from Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident: efficient education items of radiation safety for general public. Ohno K; Endo K Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):510-2. PubMed ID: 25889605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Changes in the Factors Influencing Public Acceptance of Nuclear Power Generation in Japan Since the 2011 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Disaster. Tsujikawa N; Tsuchida S; Shiotani T Risk Anal; 2016 Jan; 36(1):98-113. PubMed ID: 26224041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiological protection issues arising during and after the Fukushima nuclear reactor accident. González AJ; Akashi M; Boice JD; Chino M; Homma T; Ishigure N; Kai M; Kusumi S; Lee JK; Menzel HG; Niwa O; Sakai K; Weiss W; Yamashita S; Yonekura Y J Radiol Prot; 2013 Sep; 33(3):497-571. PubMed ID: 23803462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Nuclear safety regulation in the post-Fukushima era. Lyman E; Schoeppner M; von Hippel F Science; 2017 May; 356(6340):808-809. PubMed ID: 28546175 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Tenth Warren K. Sinclair keynote address-the Fukushima nuclear power plant accident and comprehensive health risk management. Yamashita S Health Phys; 2014 Feb; 106(2):166-80. PubMed ID: 24378490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Risk perception, trust, and factors related to a planned new nuclear power plant in Taiwan after the 2011 Fukushima disaster. Ho JC; Kao SF; Wang JD; Su CT; Lee CT; Chen RY; Chang HL; Ieong MC; Chang PW J Radiol Prot; 2013 Dec; 33(4):773-89. PubMed ID: 24048022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Internet usage and knowledge of radiation health effects and preventive behaviours among workers in Fukushima after the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident. Kanda H; Takahashi K; Sugaya N; Mizushima S; Koyama K Emerg Med J; 2014 Oct; 31(e1):e60-5. PubMed ID: 24127108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 250 mSv: temporary increase in the emergency exposure dose limit in response to the TEPCO Fukushima Daiichi NPP accident and its decision making process. Yasui S J Occup Environ Hyg; 2015; 12(4):D35-42. PubMed ID: 25436995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lessons Learned in Protection of the Public for the Accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant. Callen J; Homma T Health Phys; 2017 Jun; 112(6):550-559. PubMed ID: 28441287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Radiation measures and trend after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident]. Okazaki R Nihon Rinsho; 2014 Feb; 72(2):236-9. PubMed ID: 24605520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Review of engagement activities to promote awareness of radiation and its associated risk amongst the Japanese public before and after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident. Sakoda A; Nomura N; Kuroda Y; Kono T; Naito W; Yoshida H J Radiol Prot; 2021 Nov; 41(4):. PubMed ID: 34816800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Re: Associations Between Childhood Thyroid Cancer and External Radiation Dose After the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident. Tsuda T; Tokinobu A; Yamamoto E; Suzuki E Epidemiology; 2018 Nov; 29(6):e56-e57. PubMed ID: 30052543 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiocesium derived from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident in seabed sediments: initial deposition and inventories. Otosaka S; Kato Y Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2014 May; 16(5):978-90. PubMed ID: 24743987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. External exposure assessment in the Fukushima accident area for governmental policy planning in Japan; Part 2. Matters to be attended for assessments of external exposure. Yoshimura K; Sanada Y; Sato R; Nakayama M; Tsubokura M J Radiat Res; 2023 Mar; 64(2):203-209. PubMed ID: 36610718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perception of Radiation Risk by Japanese Radiation Specialists Evaluated as a Safe Dose Before the Fukushima Nuclear Accident. Miura M; Ono K; Yamauchi M; Matsuda N Health Phys; 2016 Jun; 110(6):558-62. PubMed ID: 27115222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Internal exposure after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident]. Shimo M Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2012; 68(7):889-96. PubMed ID: 22821163 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Latest Topics of Interest on Radiation Risk Communication: A Decade After Japan's Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident. Matsunaga H; Orita M; Xiao X; Kashiwazaki Y; Taira Y; Takamura N Disaster Med Public Health Prep; 2023 Nov; 17():e531. PubMed ID: 37974431 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Availability of Japanese Government's supplemental texts on radiation reflecting the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident for elementary and secondary education from dental students' understanding. Yoshida M; Honda E; Dashpuntsag O; Maeda N; Hosoki H; Sakama M; Tada T J Environ Radioact; 2016 May; 155-156():7-14. PubMed ID: 26875111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]