These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26718422)

  • 1. Propensity score matching for selection of local areas as controls for evaluation of effects of alcohol policies in case series and quasi case-control designs.
    de Vocht F; Campbell R; Brennan A; Mooney J; Angus C; Hickman M
    Public Health; 2016 Mar; 132():40-9. PubMed ID: 26718422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Five Steps to Successfully Implement and Evaluate Propensity Score Matching in Clinical Research Studies.
    Staffa SJ; Zurakowski D
    Anesth Analg; 2018 Oct; 127(4):1066-1073. PubMed ID: 29324498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Applied comparison of large-scale propensity score matching and cardinality matching for causal inference in observational research.
    Fortin SP; Johnston SS; Schuemie MJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 May; 21(1):109. PubMed ID: 34030640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of machine learning algorithms and covariate balance measures for propensity score matching and weighting.
    Cannas M; Arpino B
    Biom J; 2019 Jul; 61(4):1049-1072. PubMed ID: 31090108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating Propensity Score Methods in a Quasi-Experimental Study of the Impact of Menu-Labeling.
    Mayne SL; Lee BK; Auchincloss AH
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0144962. PubMed ID: 26677849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The intervention effect of local alcohol licensing policies on hospital admission and crime: a natural experiment using a novel Bayesian synthetictime-series method.
    de Vocht F; Tilling K; Pliakas T; Angus C; Egan M; Brennan A; Campbell R; Hickman M
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2017 Sep; 71(9):912-918. PubMed ID: 28679538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Application of propensity scores to explore the effect of public reporting of medicine use information on rational drug use in China: a quasi-experimental design.
    Zhang X; Wang L; Zhang X
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2014 Nov; 14():492. PubMed ID: 25384897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Selecting an appropriate caliper can be essential for achieving good balance with propensity score matching.
    Lunt M
    Am J Epidemiol; 2014 Jan; 179(2):226-35. PubMed ID: 24114655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Longitudinal Studies 4: Matching Strategies to Evaluate Risk.
    James MT
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2249():167-177. PubMed ID: 33871843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The use of propensity score matching for evaluation of the effects of nursing interventions].
    Lee SJ; Yoo JS; Shin M; Park CG; Lee HC; Choi EJ
    Taehan Kanho Hakhoe Chi; 2007 Apr; 37(3):414-21. PubMed ID: 17615462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measuring the effect of telecare on medical expenditures without bias using the propensity score matching method.
    Akematsu Y; Tsuji M
    Telemed J E Health; 2012 Dec; 18(10):743-7. PubMed ID: 23072633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Propensity score matching in otolaryngologic literature: A systematic review and critical appraisal.
    Prasad A; Shin M; Carey RM; Chorath K; Parhar H; Appel S; Moreira A; Rajasekaran K
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0244423. PubMed ID: 33382777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Investigating local policy drivers for alcohol harm prevention: a comparative case study of two local authorities in England.
    Mooney JD; Holmes J; Gavens L; de Vocht F; Hickman M; Lock K; Brennan A
    BMC Public Health; 2017 Oct; 17(1):825. PubMed ID: 29047389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating the performance of propensity score matching based approaches in individual patient data meta-analysis.
    Johara FT; Benedetti A; Platt R; Menzies D; Viiklepp P; Schaaf S; Chan E
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Nov; 21(1):257. PubMed ID: 34814845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Towards greater transparency in neurodevelopmental disorders research: use of a proposed workflow and propensity scores to facilitate selection of matched groups.
    Bang JY; Sharda M; Nadig AS
    J Neurodev Disord; 2020 Jul; 12(1):20. PubMed ID: 32709231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Health-related risk behaviors among myocardial infarction survivors in the United States: A propensity score matched study.
    Yegezu Z; Mollon L; Alshayban DM; Bilal J; Bhattacharjee S
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2021 Feb; 17(2):307-314. PubMed ID: 32360124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing the impact of natural policy experiments on socioeconomic inequalities in health: how to apply commonly used quantitative analytical methods?
    Hu Y; van Lenthe FJ; Hoffmann R; van Hedel K; Mackenbach JP
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Apr; 17(1):68. PubMed ID: 28427353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of four quasi-experimental methods: an analysis of the introduction of activity-based funding in Ireland.
    Valentelyte G; Keegan C; Sorensen J
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2022 Nov; 22(1):1311. PubMed ID: 36329423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Matching methods to quantify wildfire effects on forest carbon mass in the U.S. Pacific Northwest.
    Woo H; Eskelson BNI; Monleon VJ
    Ecol Appl; 2021 Apr; 31(3):e02283. PubMed ID: 33368744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.