132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26719119)
1. Editorial Comment.
Schroeck FR; Sirovich BE
Urology; 2015 Dec; 86(6):1198-9. PubMed ID: 26719119
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Novel biomarkers and advanced imaging modalities in the early detection of prostate cancer.
Parsons JK
J Urol; 2015 Apr; 193(4):1084-5. PubMed ID: 25596362
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. MR Imaging-Guided Focal Treatment of Prostate Cancer: An Update.
Nour SG
Radiol Clin North Am; 2018 Mar; 56(2):301-318. PubMed ID: 29420984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Editorial comment to Real-time Virtual Sonography for navigation of prostate-targeted biopsy by using magnetic resonance imaging data.
Elwagdy S
Int J Urol; 2010 Oct; 17(10):861. PubMed ID: 20887632
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Editorial comment.
Ukimura O
J Urol; 2014 Dec; 192(6):1648; discussion 1649. PubMed ID: 25194546
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Editorial comment.
Phillips J
J Urol; 2014 Dec; 192(6):1649; discussion 1649. PubMed ID: 25194544
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Re: comparative analysis of transperineal template saturation prostate biopsy versus magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy with magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion guidance.
Lazzeri M; Lughezzani G; Guazzoni G
Eur Urol; 2015 Sep; 68(3):535-6. PubMed ID: 26282352
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Editorial comment to standard and saturation transrectal prostate biopsy techniques are equally accurate among prostate cancer active surveillance candidates.
Lee M
Int J Urol; 2013 Sep; 20(9):864-5. PubMed ID: 23294147
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsies to Diagnose Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Enlarged Compared to Smaller Prostates.
de Gorski A; Rouprêt M; Peyronnet B; Le Cossec C; Granger B; Comperat E; Cussenot O; Renard-Penna R; Mozer P
J Urol; 2015 Sep; 194(3):669-73. PubMed ID: 25784374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detection of significant prostate cancer with magnetic resonance targeted biopsies--should transrectal ultrasound-magnetic resonance imaging fusion guided biopsies alone be a standard of care?
Delongchamps NB; Lefèvre A; Bouazza N; Beuvon F; Legman P; Cornud F
J Urol; 2015 Apr; 193(4):1198-204. PubMed ID: 25451824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Editorial comment.
Schilling D; Stenzl A
J Urol; 2010 Feb; 183(2):527-8; discussion 528. PubMed ID: 20006885
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Focal therapy of prostate cancer: making steady progress toward a first-line image-guided treatment modality.
Polascik TJ
Curr Opin Urol; 2015 May; 25(3):183-4. PubMed ID: 25775366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The role of magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of prostate cancer.
Choi S
J Urol; 2011 Oct; 186(4):1181-2. PubMed ID: 21849178
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative analysis of transperineal template saturation prostate biopsy versus magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy with magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion guidance.
Radtke JP; Kuru TH; Boxler S; Alt CD; Popeneciu IV; Huettenbrink C; Klein T; Steinemann S; Bergstraesser C; Roethke M; Roth W; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
J Urol; 2015 Jan; 193(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 25079939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Editorial Comment: Proctoscopy following transrectal prostate biopsy can control rectal bleeding after prostate biopsy.
Hiyama Y
Int J Urol; 2024 Feb; 31(2):143. PubMed ID: 38010075
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Visibility of prostate cancer on transrectal ultrasound during fusion with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for biopsy.
van de Ven WJ; Sedelaar JP; van der Leest MM; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Barentsz JO; Fütterer JJ; Huisman HJ
Clin Imaging; 2016; 40(4):745-50. PubMed ID: 27317220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Editorial comment to impact of high-consistency area evaluated under hand-operated transrectal compression using a sonographic probe on prostate cancer detection: clinicopathological analysis.
Eisenberg ML
Int J Urol; 2010 Oct; 17(10):880. PubMed ID: 20887634
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Results of a comparative analysis of magnetic resonance imaging-targeted versus three-dimensional transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsies: Size does matter.
Peltier A; Aoun F; Albisinni S; Marcelis Q; Ledinh D; Paesmans M; Lemort M; van Velthoven R
Scand J Urol; 2016 Jun; 50(3):144-8. PubMed ID: 26754860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [MRI of the prostate].
Nörenberg D; Solyanik O; Schlenker B; Magistro G; Ertl-Wagner B; Clevert DA; Stief C; Reiser MF; D'Anastasi M
Urologe A; 2017 May; 56(5):665-677. PubMed ID: 28424829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Editorial comment.
Crook J
Urology; 2013 Jun; 81(6):1289. PubMed ID: 23490517
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
