These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26719311)
1. Monitoring adverse events in Norwegian hospitals from 2010 to 2013. Deilkås ET; Bukholm G; Lindstrøm JC; Haugen M BMJ Open; 2015 Dec; 5(12):e008576. PubMed ID: 26719311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Characterization of adverse events detected in a large health care delivery system using an enhanced global trigger tool over a five-year interval. Kennerly DA; Kudyakov R; da Graca B; Saldaña M; Compton J; Nicewander D; Gilder R Health Serv Res; 2014 Oct; 49(5):1407-25. PubMed ID: 24628436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Exploring similarities and differences in hospital adverse event rates between Norway and Sweden using Global Trigger Tool. Deilkås ET; Risberg MB; Haugen M; Lindstrøm JC; Nylén U; Rutberg H; Michael S BMJ Open; 2017 Mar; 7(3):e012492. PubMed ID: 28320786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Triggering management for quality improvement. Scales CD; Schulman KA Health Serv Res; 2014 Oct; 49(5):1401-6. PubMed ID: 25255819 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Incidence of adverse events in Sweden during 2013-2016: a cohort study describing the implementation of a national trigger tool. Nilsson L; Borgstedt-Risberg M; Soop M; Nylén U; Ålenius C; Rutberg H BMJ Open; 2018 Mar; 8(3):e020833. PubMed ID: 29602858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detection of adverse events in an acute geriatric hospital over a 6-year period using the Global Trigger Tool. Suarez C; Menendez MD; Alonso J; Castaño N; Alonso M; Vazquez F J Am Geriatr Soc; 2014 May; 62(5):896-900. PubMed ID: 24697662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of the global trigger tool to measure, monitor and evaluate patient safety in cancer patients: reliability concerns are raised. Mattsson TO; Knudsen JL; Lauritsen J; Brixen K; Herrstedt J BMJ Qual Saf; 2013 Jul; 22(7):571-9. PubMed ID: 23447657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The association between patient-reported incidents in hospitals and estimated rates of patient harm. Bjertnaes O; Deilkås ET; Skudal KE; Iversen HH; Bjerkan AM Int J Qual Health Care; 2015 Feb; 27(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 25417226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is a modified Global Trigger Tool method using automatic trigger identification valid when measuring adverse events? Mevik K; Hansen TE; Deilkås EC; Ringdal AM; Vonen B Int J Qual Health Care; 2019 Aug; 31(7):535-540. PubMed ID: 30295829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does increasing the size of bi-weekly samples of records influence results when using the Global Trigger Tool? An observational study of retrospective record reviews of two different sample sizes. Mevik K; Griffin FA; Hansen TE; Deilkås ET; Vonen B BMJ Open; 2016 Apr; 6(4):e010700. PubMed ID: 27113238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Applying the Global Trigger Tool in German Hospitals: A Pilot in Surgery and Neurosurgery. Brösterhaus M; Hammer A; Kalina S; Grau S; Roeth AA; Ashmawy H; Groß T; Binnebösel M; Knoefel WT; Manser T J Patient Saf; 2020 Dec; 16(4):e340-e351. PubMed ID: 33215895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mitigating risk in Norwegian psychiatric care: Identifying triggers of adverse events through Global Trigger Tool for psychiatric care. Okkenhaug A; Tritter JQ; Myklebust TÅ; Deilkås ET; Meirik K; Landstad BJ Int J Risk Saf Med; 2019; 30(4):203-216. PubMed ID: 31561389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Characterisations of adverse events detected in a university hospital: a 4-year study using the Global Trigger Tool method. Rutberg H; Borgstedt Risberg M; Sjödahl R; Nordqvist P; Valter L; Nilsson L BMJ Open; 2014 May; 4(5):e004879. PubMed ID: 24871538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Patient safety in developing countries: retrospective estimation of scale and nature of harm to patients in hospital. Wilson RM; Michel P; Olsen S; Gibberd RW; Vincent C; El-Assady R; Rasslan O; Qsous S; Macharia WM; Sahel A; Whittaker S; Abdo-Ali M; Letaief M; Ahmed NA; Abdellatif A; Larizgoitia I; BMJ; 2012 Mar; 344():e832. PubMed ID: 22416061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of three methods for estimating rates of adverse events and rates of preventable adverse events in acute care hospitals. Michel P; Quenon JL; de Sarasqueta AM; Scemama O BMJ; 2004 Jan; 328(7433):199. PubMed ID: 14739187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can patient safety indicators monitor medical and surgical care at New Zealand public hospitals? Hider P; Parker K; von Randow M; Milne B; Lay-Yee R; Davis P N Z Med J; 2014 Nov; 127(1405):32-44. PubMed ID: 25399040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of adverse events in medical care: lack of consistency between experienced teams using the global trigger tool. Schildmeijer K; Nilsson L; Arestedt K; Perk J BMJ Qual Saf; 2012 Apr; 21(4):307-14. PubMed ID: 22362917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adverse events related to hospital care: a retrospective medical records review in a Swiss hospital. Halfon P; Staines A; Burnand B Int J Qual Health Care; 2017 Aug; 29(4):527-533. PubMed ID: 28586414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Large-scale deployment of the Global Trigger Tool across a large hospital system: refinements for the characterisation of adverse events to support patient safety learning opportunities. Good VS; Saldaña M; Gilder R; Nicewander D; Kennerly DA BMJ Qual Saf; 2011 Jan; 20(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 21228072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Variations in the epidemiolgy of adverse events: methodology of the Harvard Medical Practice Design]. Lessing C; Schmitz A; Schrappe M Gesundheitswesen; 2012 Feb; 74(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 21761388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]