These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26720203)

  • 1. Assessment of Coronary Artery Calcium on Low-Dose Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography With Iterative Reconstruction.
    Braber TL; Willemink MJ; Bohté EH; Mosterd A; Leiner T; Velthuis BK
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2016; 40(2):266-71. PubMed ID: 26720203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction on Agatston Coronary Artery Calcium Scores in Comparison to Filtered Back Projection in Native Cardiac CT.
    Obmann VC; Klink T; Heverhagen JT; Stork A; Laqmani A; Adam G; Begemann PG
    Rofo; 2015 May; 187(5):372-9. PubMed ID: 25962672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Determining the radiation dose reduction potential for coronary calcium scanning with computed tomography: an anthropomorphic phantom study comparing filtered backprojection and the adaptive iterative dose reduction algorithm for image reconstruction.
    Blobel J; Mews J; Schuijf JD; Overlaet W
    Invest Radiol; 2013 Dec; 48(12):857-62. PubMed ID: 23917328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiation dose reduction at coronary artery calcium scoring by using a low tube current technique and hybrid iterative reconstruction.
    Matsuura N; Urashima M; Fukumoto W; Sunamori H; Tatsugami F; Toyota N; Awai K
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(1):119-24. PubMed ID: 25319604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Iterative beam-hardening correction with advanced modeled iterative reconstruction in low voltage CT coronary calcium scoring with tin filtration: Impact on coronary artery calcium quantification and image quality.
    Tesche C; De Cecco CN; Schoepf UJ; Duguay TM; Albrecht MH; Caruso D; Varga-Szemes A; Lesslie VW; Ebersberger U; Canstein C; Thilo C; Hoffmann E; Allmendinger T; Nance JW
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017; 11(5):354-359. PubMed ID: 28756086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Submillisievert coronary calcium quantification using model-based iterative reconstruction: A within-patient analysis.
    den Harder AM; Wolterink JM; Willemink MJ; Schilham AMR; de Jong PA; Budde RPJ; Nathoe HM; Išgum I; Leiner T
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Nov; 85(11):2152-2159. PubMed ID: 27776671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction in coronary computed tomography angiography: comparison with hybrid iterative reconstruction and filtered back projection.
    Cha MJ; Seo JS; Yoo DS; Chong S
    Acta Radiol; 2018 Mar; 59(3):280-286. PubMed ID: 28648124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of iterative model reconstruction on coronary artery calcium quantification.
    Szilveszter B; Elzomor H; Károlyi M; Kolossváry M; Raaijmakers R; Benke K; Celeng C; Bartykowszki A; Bagyura Z; Lux Á; Merkely B; Maurovich-Horvat P
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jan; 32(1):153-60. PubMed ID: 26285899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimization of HU threshold for coronary artery calcium scans reconstructed at 0.5-mm slice thickness using iterative reconstruction.
    Hou KY; Tsujioka K; Yang CC
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 21(2):111-120. PubMed ID: 31889419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Influence of Iterative Reconstruction on Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring-Phantom and Clinical Studies.
    Oda S; Utsunomiya D; Nakaura T; Funama Y; Yuki H; Kidoh M; Hirata K; Taguchi N; Honda K; Takaoka H; Iyama Y; Katahira K; Noda K; Oshima S; Tokuyasu S; Yamashita Y
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Mar; 24(3):295-301. PubMed ID: 27913107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Iterative model reconstruction reduces calcified plaque volume in coronary CT angiography.
    Károlyi M; Szilveszter B; Kolossváry M; Takx RA; Celeng C; Bartykowszki A; Jermendy ÁL; Panajotu A; Karády J; Raaijmakers R; Giepmans W; Merkely B; Maurovich-Horvat P
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Feb; 87():83-89. PubMed ID: 28065380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of coronary artery image quality with knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction.
    Halpern EJ; Gingold EL; White H; Read K
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Jun; 21(6):805-11. PubMed ID: 24809321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of CT radiation dose reduction and iterative reconstruction algorithms from four different vendors on coronary calcium scoring.
    Willemink MJ; Takx RA; de Jong PA; Budde RP; Bleys RL; Das M; Wildberger JE; Prokop M; Buls N; de Mey J; Schilham AM; Leiner T
    Eur Radiol; 2014 Sep; 24(9):2201-12. PubMed ID: 24889996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Iterative image reconstruction techniques for CT coronary artery calcium quantification: comparison with traditional filtered back projection in vitro and in vivo.
    Schindler A; Vliegenthart R; Schoepf UJ; Blanke P; Ebersberger U; Cho YJ; Allmendinger T; Vogt S; Raupach R; Fink C; Saam T; Bamberg F; Nikolaou K; Apfaltrer P
    Radiology; 2014 Feb; 270(2):387-93. PubMed ID: 24471388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Finding the optimal dose reduction and iterative reconstruction level for coronary calcium scoring.
    Willemink MJ; den Harder AM; Foppen W; Schilham AM; Rienks R; Laufer EM; Nieman K; de Jong PA; Budde RP; Nathoe HM; Leiner T
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 26342405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prospective evaluation of the influence of iterative reconstruction on the reproducibility of coronary calcium quantification in reduced radiation dose 320 detector row CT.
    Choi AD; Leifer ES; Yu J; Shanbhag SM; Bronson K; Arai AE; Chen MY
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(5):359-63. PubMed ID: 27591767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Approaches to ultra-low radiation dose coronary artery calcium scoring based on 3rd generation dual-source CT: A phantom study.
    McQuiston AD; Muscogiuri G; Schoepf UJ; Meinel FG; Canstein C; Varga-Szemes A; Cannao' PM; Wichmann JL; Allmendinger T; Vliegenthart R; De Cecco CN
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 26724647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The feasibility of sub-millisievert coronary CT angiography with low tube voltage, prospective ECG gating, and a knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction algorithm.
    Park CH; Lee J; Oh C; Han KH; Kim TH
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Dec; 31 Suppl 2():197-203. PubMed ID: 26521066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Value of knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction in low-kV 256-slice coronary CT angiography.
    Yuki H; Utsunomiya D; Funama Y; Tokuyasu S; Namimoto T; Hirai T; Itatani R; Katahira K; Oshima S; Yamashita Y
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2014; 8(2):115-23. PubMed ID: 24661824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of heavily calcified vessels with coronary CT angiography: comparison of iterative and filtered back projection image reconstruction.
    Renker M; Nance JW; Schoepf UJ; O'Brien TX; Zwerner PL; Meyer M; Kerl JM; Bauer RW; Fink C; Vogl TJ; Henzler T
    Radiology; 2011 Aug; 260(2):390-9. PubMed ID: 21693660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.