These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26720957)

  • 1. Synergistic Approach with Twin Block and Fixed Appliance Therapy in Class II Div 2 Malocclusion: A Case Report.
    Shastri D; Tandon P; Singh GP
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2015; 26(3):63-6. PubMed ID: 26720957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A preliminary report of a new design of cast metal fixed twin-block appliance.
    Qi J; Tan ZR; He H; Pan D; Yeweng SJ
    J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 34(4):213-9. PubMed ID: 18042821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Treatment of Class II Div I malocclusion with two phase therapy--a case report.
    Jyothikiran H; Shanthraj R; Kumar YP; Subbiah P
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2013; 24(2):45-8. PubMed ID: 23941030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Twin-block and Dynamax appliances for the treatment of Class II malocclusion in adolescents: a randomized controlled trial.
    Thiruvenkatachari B; Sandler J; Murray A; Walsh T; O'Brien K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Aug; 138(2):144.e1-9; discussion 144-5. PubMed ID: 20691354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Treatment of developing Class II Division 1 malocclusion with Jumper Twin Block.
    Hammad SM; Bashir ES; El-Bialy AA
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2012; 23(2):51-6. PubMed ID: 22873025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of 2 modifications of the twin-block appliance in matched Class II samples.
    Parkin NA; McKeown HF; Sandler PJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jun; 119(6):572-7. PubMed ID: 11395699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Two-phase orthodontic treatment of a patient with a low-angle skeletal class II malocclusion: a 7-year follow-up.
    Fan X; Fang S; Chen Z; Mo S
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2023 Nov; 47(6):178-184. PubMed ID: 37997250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The modified twin block appliance in the treatment of Class II division 2 malocclusions.
    Dyer FM; McKeown HF; Sandler PJ
    J Orthod; 2001 Dec; 28(4):271-80. PubMed ID: 11709592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of Twin Block of Clark in management of Angle's Class II Division I malocclusion. Case report.
    Isiekwe GI; DaCosta OO
    N Y State Dent J; 2013 Nov; 79(6):30-4. PubMed ID: 24600762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Treatment effects of magnetic Twin-block appliance for class II cases].
    Wu JY; Liu J; Li QS; Xu TM; Lin JX
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Sep; 42(9):519-24. PubMed ID: 18070424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparision of Twin-block and Forsus (FRD) functional appliance--a cephalometric study.
    Mahamad IK; Neela PK; Mascarenhas R; Husain A
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2012; 23(3):49-58. PubMed ID: 23094559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Treatment of a Class II Division 2 Patient with Severe Skeletal Discrepancy by Using a Custom Made TPA Proclination Spring.
    Paduano S; Spagnuolo G; Biase Gd; Cioffi I
    Open Dent J; 2013; 7():109-17. PubMed ID: 24155800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Two-phase treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion with the combination of the twin-block appliance and high-pull headgear.
    Lv Y; Yan B; Wang L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Aug; 142(2):246-55. PubMed ID: 22858335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Correction of severe class II skeletal discrepancy with fixed twin block and high pull headgear--a case report.
    Patel D; Parekh H; Gupta B; Purl T
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2014; 25(4):51-5. PubMed ID: 25745711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Twin Block appliance for the correction of Class II malocclusion.
    Trenouth MJ
    Dent Update; 2005; 32(6):362; author reply 362. PubMed ID: 16117358
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Management of severe Class II division 1 malocclusion: a case report.
    Felicita AS; Chandrasekar S; Sundari KK
    Aust Orthod J; 2011 Nov; 27(2):181-90. PubMed ID: 22372276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stability of Class II treatment with an edgewise crowned Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition: Skeletal and dental changes.
    Wigal TG; Dischinger T; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug; 140(2):210-23. PubMed ID: 21803259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Effect of Twin-block appliance in the treatment of Class II and division I malocclusion: a cephalometric study in 12 patients].
    Luo Y; Fang G
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2005 Feb; 14(1):90-3. PubMed ID: 15747025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Two-phase treatment of an Angle Class II division 2 malocclusion.
    Rapaport M
    Aust Orthod J; 1998 Mar; 15(2):113-25. PubMed ID: 9590927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes concurrent to use of Twin Block appliance in class II division I cases with a deficient mandible: a cephalometric study.
    Sharma AK; Sachdev V; Singla A; Kirtaniya BC
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(3):218-26. PubMed ID: 23263425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.