109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26721003)
1. LAPAROTOMY FOR PERITONITIS: PRIMARY OR DELAYED PRIMARY CLOSURE?
Nasib G; Shah SI; Bashir EA
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2015; 27(3):543-5. PubMed ID: 26721003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Outcome of primary closure of abdominal wounds following laparotomy for peritonitis in children.
Kache SA; Mshelbwala PM; Ameh EA
Afr J Paediatr Surg; 2016; 13(4):185-188. PubMed ID: 28051048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Management strategy for dirty abdominal incisions: primary or delayed primary closure? A randomized trial.
Duttaroy DD; Jitendra J; Duttaroy B; Bansal U; Dhameja P; Patel G; Modi N
Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2009 Apr; 10(2):129-36. PubMed ID: 19388835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Primary versus delayed primary closure of laparotomy wounds in children following typhoid ileal perforation in Ile-Ife, Nigeria.
Inyang AW; Usang UE; Talabi AO; Anyanwu LC; Sowande OA; Adejuyigbe O
Afr J Paediatr Surg; 2017; 14(4):70-73. PubMed ID: 30688281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Superficial Surgical Site Infection Between Delayed Primary Versus Primary Wound Closure in Complicated Appendicitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Siribumrungwong B; Chantip A; Noorit P; Wilasrusmee C; Ungpinitpong W; Chotiya P; Leerapan B; Woratanarat P; McEvoy M; Attia J; Thakkinstian A
Ann Surg; 2018 Apr; 267(4):631-637. PubMed ID: 28796014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Delayed primary closure versus primary closure for wound management in perforated appendicitis: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
Chiang RA; Chen SL; Tsai YC
J Chin Med Assoc; 2012 Apr; 75(4):156-9. PubMed ID: 22541143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prospective randomized trial of two wound management strategies for dirty abdominal wounds.
Cohn SM; Giannotti G; Ong AW; Varela JE; Shatz DV; McKenney MG; Sleeman D; Ginzburg E; Augenstein JS; Byers PM; Sands LR; Hellinger MD; Namias N
Ann Surg; 2001 Mar; 233(3):409-13. PubMed ID: 11224630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficacy of Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy for Preventing Surgical Site Infections after Surgery for Peritonitis Attributable to Lower-Gastrointestinal Perforation: A Single-Institution Experience.
Danno K; Matsuda C; Miyazaki S; Komori T; Nakanishi M; Motoori M; Kashiwazaki M; Fujitani K
Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2018 Oct; 19(7):711-716. PubMed ID: 30183559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A randomized trial analyzing the effects of primary versus delayed primary closure of incision on wound healing in patients with hollow viscus perforation.
Baksi A; Chatterjee S; Ray U; Nilima N; Firoz Khan W; Banerjee N
Turk J Surg; 2020 Dec; 36(4):327-332. PubMed ID: 33778390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Primary Versus Delayed Primary Incision Closure in Contaminated Abdominal Surgery: A Meta-Analysis.
Tang S; Hu W; Hu L; Zhou J
J Surg Res; 2019 Jul; 239():22-30. PubMed ID: 30782543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of rate of surgical wound infection, length of hospital stay and patient convenience in complicated appendicitis between primary closure and delayed primary closure.
Khan KI; Mahmood S; Akmal M; Waqas A
J Pak Med Assoc; 2012 Jun; 62(6):596-8. PubMed ID: 22755347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Addition of rectus sheath relaxation incisions to emergency midline laparotomy for peritonitis to prevent fascial dehiscence.
Marwah S; Marwah N; Singh M; Kapoor A; Karwasra RK
World J Surg; 2005 Feb; 29(2):235-9. PubMed ID: 15654663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Surgical Site Infection Rate Drops to 0% Using a Vacuum-Assisted Closure in Contaminated/Dirty Infected Laparotomy Wounds.
Lozano-Balderas G; Ruiz-Velasco-Santacruz A; Díaz-Elizondo JA; Gómez-Navarro JA; Flores-Villalba E
Am Surg; 2017 May; 83(5):512-514. PubMed ID: 28541864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Role of suture material and technique of closure in wound outcome following laparotomy for peritonitis.
Agrawal V; Sharma N; Joshi MK; Minocha VR
Trop Gastroenterol; 2009; 30(4):237-40. PubMed ID: 20426290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Primary Closure Versus Delayed Primary Closure of Class III and IV Surgical Wounds Following Emergency Laparotomy: A Prospective Comparative Study.
Venkateswaran R; Bhagvat S; Dutt A; Padekar HD; Mirkhushal N; Chetan AA
Cureus; 2023 Nov; 15(11):e48965. PubMed ID: 38024020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of the"bogota bag"for closure of open abdominal wound after exploratory laparotomy - our experience at Mayo Hospital Lahore.
Muhammad Y; Gondal KM; Khan UA
J Pak Med Assoc; 2016 Aug; 66(8):980-3. PubMed ID: 27524532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Septic necrosis of the midline wound in postoperative peritonitis. Successful management by debridement, myocutaneous advancement, and primary skin closure.
Lévy E; Palmer DL; Frileux P; Hannoun L; Nordlinger B; Tiret E; Honiger J; Parc R
Ann Surg; 1988 Apr; 207(4):470-9. PubMed ID: 3281613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Wound infection after ileostomy closure: a prospective randomized study comparing primary vs. delayed primary closure techniques.
Lahat G; Tulchinsky H; Goldman G; Klauzner JM; Rabau M
Tech Coloproctol; 2005 Dec; 9(3):206-8. PubMed ID: 16328128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Negative pressure wound therapy versus standard care for incisional laparotomy subcutaneous wounds in gastrointestinal perforations: A randomized controlled study.
Singh H; Avudaiappan M; Kharel J; Irrinki S; Kumar H; Savlania A; Sharma V; Gupta V; Yadav TD; Gupta R
Surgery; 2023 Aug; 174(2):291-295. PubMed ID: 37183134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Modified midline abdominal wound closure technique in complicated/high risk laparotomies.
Murtaza B; Ali Khan N; Sharif MA; Malik IB; Mahmood A
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2010 Jan; 20(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 20141691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
