230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26723098)
1. Preimpression troughing with the diode laser: A preliminary study.
Stuffken M; Vahidi F
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Apr; 115(4):441-6. PubMed ID: 26723098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A multicenter randomized, controlled clinical trial comparing the use of displacement cords, an aluminum chloride paste, and a combination of paste and cords for tissue displacement.
Einarsdottir ER; Lang NP; Aspelund T; Pjetursson BE
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jan; 119(1):82-88. PubMed ID: 28478985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative evaluation of the effect of impregnated retraction cord versus laser on gingival attachment level and pain perception following retraction for subgingival margins - A prospective, split-mouth, controlled, clinical study.
Diwan V; Chauhan MR; Tembhurne J; Gangurde A; Wani H; Danane S
J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2024 Apr; 24(2):136-143. PubMed ID: 38650338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A clinical comparison of cordless and conventional displacement systems regarding clinical performance and impression quality.
Acar Ö; Erkut S; Özçelik TB; Ozdemır E; Akçil M
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 May; 111(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 24360008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Gingival displacement using diode laser or retraction cords: A comparative clinical study.
Melilli D; Mauceri R; Albanese A; Matranga D; Pizzo G
Am J Dent; 2018 Jun; 31(3):131-134. PubMed ID: 30028930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of efficacy of different gingival displacement materials on gingival sulcus width.
Prasanna GS; Reddy K; Kumar RK; Shivaprakash S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Mar; 14(2):217-21. PubMed ID: 23811648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Gingival Troughing by Laser and Retraction Cord.
Tao X; Yao JW; Wang HL; Huang C
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2018; 38(4):527-532. PubMed ID: 29889917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The use of retraction paste to simplify impression and cementation of ceramic veneers and crowns: 3-year follow-up report.
Andreiuolo RF; Abreu JLB; Hirata R
Quintessence Int; 2019; 50(8):604-610. PubMed ID: 31286117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Laser Troughing to Improve Scanning and Impressions.
Kurtzman GM; Agarwal T
Dent Today; 2017 Jan; 36(1):122-5. PubMed ID: 29235779
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of an erbium laser in lieu of retraction cord: a modern technique.
Scott A
Gen Dent; 2005; 53(2):116-9. PubMed ID: 15833012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical outcomes of three different crown systems with CAD/CAM technology.
Batson ER; Cooper LF; Duqum I; Mendonça G
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):770-7. PubMed ID: 24980739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accurate transfer of soft tissue morphology with interim prosthesis to definitive cast.
Noh K; Kwon KR; Kim HS; Kim DS; Pae A
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Feb; 111(2):159-62. PubMed ID: 24286639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Access to the intracrevicular space in preparations for fixed prosthesis].
Porzier J; Benner-Jordan L; Bourdeau B; Losfeld R
Cah Prothese; 1991 Mar; (73):6-20. PubMed ID: 2013007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of different retraction and impression techniques on the marginal fit of crowns.
Wöstmann B; Rehmann P; Trost D; Balkenhol M
J Dent; 2008 Jul; 36(7):508-12. PubMed ID: 18479801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Posterior crown troughing with the AMD Picasso lite diode laser.
van As G
Dent Today; 2011 Nov; 30(11):168. PubMed ID: 22187816
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A randomized controlled clinical trial comparing the use of displacement cords and aluminum chloride paste.
Bennani V; Aarts JM; Brunton P
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2020 Jun; 32(4):410-415. PubMed ID: 32442353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Iatrogenic acid-induced gingival recession during crown cementation: A case report.
Kofina V; An H; Rawal SY
Aust Dent J; 2021 Sep; 66(3):332-336. PubMed ID: 33438220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical acceptance of single-unit crowns and its association with impression and tissue displacement techniques: Findings from the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.
Lawson NC; Litaker MS; Sowell E; Gordan VV; Mungia R; Ronzo KR; Lam BT; Gilbert GH; McCracken MS;
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 May; 123(5):701-709. PubMed ID: 31590974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical Assessment of Gingival Sulcus Width using Various Gingival Displacement Materials.
Goutham GB; Jayanti I; Jalaluddin M; Avijeeta A; Ramanna PK; Joy J
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 May; 19(5):502-506. PubMed ID: 29807958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Comparative Analysis of Post-Retraction Changes in Gingival Height after Conventional and Surgical Gingival Displacement: Rotary Curettage, Diode and Er:YAG Laser Troughing.
Kazakova R; Vlahova A; Tomov G; Dimitrova M; Kazakov S; Zlatev S; Forte M; Barile G; Corsalini M; Capodiferro S
Healthcare (Basel); 2023 Aug; 11(16):. PubMed ID: 37628460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
