These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26723117)

  • 1. Technical note: Equivalent genomic models with a residual polygenic effect.
    Liu Z; Goddard ME; Hayes BJ; Reinhardt F; Reents R
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Mar; 99(3):2016-2025. PubMed ID: 26723117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Single-step SNP-BLUP with on-the-fly imputed genotypes and residual polygenic effects.
    Taskinen M; Mäntysaari EA; Strandén I
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Mar; 49(1):36. PubMed ID: 28359261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of genomic predictions using genomic relationship matrices built with different weighting factors to account for locus-specific variances.
    Su G; Christensen OF; Janss L; Lund MS
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Oct; 97(10):6547-59. PubMed ID: 25129495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genome-wide association study and prediction of genomic breeding values for fatty-acid composition in Korean Hanwoo cattle using a high-density single-nucleotide polymorphism array.
    Bhuiyan MSA; Kim YK; Kim HJ; Lee DH; Lee SH; Yoon HB; Lee SH
    J Anim Sci; 2018 Sep; 96(10):4063-4075. PubMed ID: 30265318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. SNP- and haplotype-based single-step genomic predictions for body weight, wool, and reproductive traits in North American Rambouillet sheep.
    Araujo AC; Carneiro PLS; Oliveira HR; Lewis RM; Brito LF
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2023 Mar; 140(2):216-234. PubMed ID: 36408677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the equivalence between marker effect models and breeding value models and direct genomic values with the Algorithm for Proven and Young.
    Bermann M; Lourenco D; Forneris NS; Legarra A; Misztal I
    Genet Sel Evol; 2022 Jul; 54(1):52. PubMed ID: 35842585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A single-step genomic model with direct estimation of marker effects.
    Liu Z; Goddard ME; Reinhardt F; Reents R
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Sep; 97(9):5833-50. PubMed ID: 25022678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genomic prediction of breeding values using previously estimated SNP variances.
    Calus MP; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Sep; 46(1):52. PubMed ID: 25928875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using markers with large effect in genetic and genomic predictions.
    Lopes MS; Bovenhuis H; van Son M; Nordbø Ø; Grindflek EH; Knol EF; Bastiaansen JW
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Jan; 95(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 28177367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using Monte Carlo method to include polygenic effects in calculation of SNP-BLUP model reliability.
    Ben Zaabza H; Mäntysaari EA; Strandén I
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jun; 103(6):5170-5182. PubMed ID: 32253036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracies of breeding values for dry matter intake using nongenotyped animals and predictor traits in different lactations.
    Manzanilla-Pech CIV; Veerkamp RF; de Haas Y; Calus MPL; Ten Napel J
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Nov; 100(11):9103-9114. PubMed ID: 28865857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Alternative SNP weighting for single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor evaluation of stature in US Holsteins in the presence of selected sequence variants.
    Fragomeni BO; Lourenco DAL; Legarra A; VanRaden PM; Misztal I
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Nov; 102(11):10012-10019. PubMed ID: 31495612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Indirect predictions with a large number of genotyped animals using the algorithm for proven and young.
    Garcia ALS; Masuda Y; Tsuruta S; Miller S; Misztal I; Lourenco D
    J Anim Sci; 2020 Jun; 98(6):. PubMed ID: 32374831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison on genomic predictions using three GBLUP methods and two single-step blending methods in the Nordic Holstein population.
    Gao H; Christensen OF; Madsen P; Nielsen US; Zhang Y; Lund MS; Su G
    Genet Sel Evol; 2012 Jul; 44(1):8. PubMed ID: 22455934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impacts of both reference population size and inclusion of a residual polygenic effect on the accuracy of genomic prediction.
    Liu Z; Seefried FR; Reinhardt F; Rensing S; Thaller G; Reents R
    Genet Sel Evol; 2011 May; 43(1):19. PubMed ID: 21586131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performances of Adaptive MultiBLUP, Bayesian regressions, and weighted-GBLUP approaches for genomic predictions in Belgian Blue beef cattle.
    Gualdrón Duarte JL; Gori AS; Hubin X; Lourenco D; Charlier C; Misztal I; Druet T
    BMC Genomics; 2020 Aug; 21(1):545. PubMed ID: 32762654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. International bull evaluations by genomic BLUP with a prediction population.
    Fragomeni B; Masuda Y; Bradford HL; Lourenco DAL; Misztal I
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Mar; 102(3):2330-2335. PubMed ID: 30639016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Alternative methods improve the accuracy of genomic prediction using information from a causal point mutation in a dairy sheep model.
    Oget C; Teissier M; Astruc JM; Tosser-Klopp G; Rupp R
    BMC Genomics; 2019 Sep; 20(1):719. PubMed ID: 31533617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimation of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in a multibreed cattle population.
    Khansefid M; Pryce JE; Bolormaa S; Miller SP; Wang Z; Li C; Goddard ME
    J Anim Sci; 2014 Aug; 92(8):3270-83. PubMed ID: 25074450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracies of genomic prediction of feed efficiency traits using different prediction and validation methods in an experimental Nelore cattle population.
    Silva RM; Fragomeni BO; Lourenco DA; Magalhães AF; Irano N; Carvalheiro R; Canesin RC; Mercadante ME; Boligon AA; Baldi FS; Misztal I; Albuquerque LG
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Sep; 94(9):3613-3623. PubMed ID: 27898889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.